Alphabet (GOOGL) vs Meta (META)
Alphabet traded at $338.89 on April 23, 2026, with market capitalization $4.1 trillion. Meta traded at $675.18 on April 25, with market capitalization $1.71 trillion.
Also known as: Alphabet (GOOGL) (STK_GOOGL, Google, Alphabet) · Meta (META) (STK_META, Facebook)
Why This Comparison Matters
Alphabet traded at $338.89 on April 23, 2026, with market capitalization $4.1 trillion. Meta traded at $675.18 on April 25, with market capitalization $1.71 trillion. GOOGL's 2.4x market cap premium over META reflects Alphabet's broader business mix (Search, YouTube, Cloud, Hardware) versus Meta's social-media-and-VR focus. The two companies dominate US digital advertising: Google annualized $200 billion search ads + $40 billion YouTube ads versus Meta $200 billion ads. Combined, the duopoly captures approximately 50 percent of global digital advertising spend. The pair captures the digital ad allocation rotation plus AI strategy divergence (GOOGL Cloud + Gemini in-house vs META open-source Llama + Reality Labs).
GOOGL vs META: The Digital Ad Duopoly
Alphabet and Meta together capture approximately 50 percent of global digital advertising spending in 2026. Google's ad revenue (Search $200 billion annualized, YouTube $40 billion, Network $30 billion) totals approximately $270 billion. Meta's ad revenue (Facebook, Instagram, Reels) totals approximately $200 billion annualized. The duopoly represents one of the most concentrated commercial categories globally.
The two companies have very different platform structures. Google's ads are dominated by Search (intent-driven, high commercial value) and YouTube (video, brand-focused). Meta's ads are dominated by Facebook, Instagram, and Reels (social, demographic-targeted, increasingly performance-focused). Markets generally view Google ads as higher-quality (higher conversion rates, lower volatility) but slower-growing, while Meta ads are higher-growth but higher-volatility. The pair's relative performance reflects which ad model is winning marketplace share at any given time.
GOOGL's Diversification Premium
GOOGL trades at $4.1 trillion despite only 1.35x META's annualized revenue ($350 billion vs $200 billion). The premium reflects the diversification: Google Cloud (third-largest cloud provider at $71 billion annualized, growing 48 percent), Hardware (Pixel, Nest), Other Bets (Waymo, Verily, GV), and the AI infrastructure (TPUs, Gemini). META's simpler structure (advertising plus Reality Labs) commands less of a multiple premium.
The diversification matters because of risk concentration. GOOGL has approximately 80 percent ad revenue and 20 percent other; META has approximately 97 percent ad revenue. A digital ad market downturn would hit META more directly than GOOGL. This is why GOOGL has traditionally been valued at a premium (forward P/E 25x vs META 25x in April 2026, with GOOGL's premium narrower in the AI cycle as META's ad growth has accelerated).
AI Strategy Divergence
GOOGL and META have pursued radically different AI strategies. Google built proprietary AI in-house: Gemini (750 million MAU, generation 3.0 launched August 2025) on TPU silicon. The strategy plays to Google's research depth (DeepMind) and infrastructure scale (TPU custom chips reduce NVIDIA dependence).
Meta released Llama as open-source (1 billion+ cumulative downloads) on NVIDIA-and-Meta-MTIA hybrid infrastructure. The strategy plays to Meta's ecosystem leverage (every Llama developer becomes a potential Meta customer) and regulatory positioning (open-source is harder to regulate than closed APIs). The "Avocado" LLM expected in early 2026 is rumored to be proprietary, suggesting Meta may shift toward dual strategy.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Meta (META) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Alphabet (GOOGL). Computed from 1,289 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Meta (META) falls 0.71% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.43%. 128 qualifying events; Meta (META) closed positive in 46% of them.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GOOGL bigger than META?+
Yes, by a substantial margin. Alphabet traded at $338.89 on April 23, 2026, with market capitalization $4.1 trillion. Meta traded at $675.18 on April 25, with market capitalization $1.71 trillion. GOOGL's 2.4x market cap premium over META reflects Alphabet's broader business mix (Search, YouTube, Cloud, Hardware, Other Bets) versus Meta's social-media-and-VR focus. Despite GOOGL's 1.35x revenue advantage ($350 billion vs $200 billion annualized), markets pay a substantial valuation premium for GOOGL's diversification and reduced ad-revenue concentration.
How big is the digital ad duopoly?+
Google ($270 billion annualized: Search $200B, YouTube $40B, Network $30B) and Meta ($200 billion annualized) capture approximately 50 percent of global digital advertising spending in 2026. The duopoly represents one of the most concentrated commercial categories globally. The two companies have different platform structures: Google ads are dominated by Search (intent-driven, high commercial value) and YouTube (video, brand-focused); Meta ads are dominated by Facebook, Instagram, and Reels (social, demographic-targeted, performance-focused).
How do their AI strategies differ?+
GOOGL built proprietary AI in-house (Gemini 750M MAU, generation 3.0 August 2025) on TPU custom silicon, reducing NVIDIA dependence. META released Llama as open-source (1B+ cumulative downloads) on hybrid NVIDIA-and-Meta-MTIA infrastructure. GOOGL's strategy plays to research depth (DeepMind) and infrastructure scale; META's strategy plays to ecosystem leverage and regulatory positioning. The "Avocado" LLM expected early 2026 may be META's proprietary alternative, suggesting dual strategy. Markets favored GOOGL's direct-revenue strategy in 2024 to 2025; META has caught up in 2025 to 2026.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.