Ethereum vs Nasdaq 100
Ethereum closed at $2,353.84 on April 23, 2026; QQQ traded near $656. The ETH/QQQ ratio is approximately 3.59.
Also known as: Ethereum (ETHUSD, Ether) · Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) (ETF_QQQ, Nasdaq, NDX)
Why This Comparison Matters
Ethereum closed at $2,353.84 on April 23, 2026; QQQ traded near $656. The ETH/QQQ ratio is approximately 3.59. Ethereum often trades as leveraged tech beta with rallies and drawdowns magnifying QQQ moves: typically 2-3x QQQ in risk-on rallies, 2-3x QQQ in risk-off selloffs. The pair captures whether ETH is trading on macro tech-beta or crypto-specific drivers (network upgrades, DeFi growth, L2 scaling, ETF flows). ETH has lagged QQQ throughout 2024-2026, with cumulative QQQ outperformance of approximately 80 percentage points since 2022 lows. The 2025 ETH ATH of approximately $4,100 in late August coincided with QQQ rally; the subsequent ETH retracement to current $2,354 (-43 percent) has been more severe than QQQ retracement.
The April 2026 Configuration
Ethereum closed at $2,353.84 on April 23, 2026; QQQ traded near $656. ETH 200-day MA at $2,310 acts as support; monthly RSI 52 (neutral). QQQ has been in 2025-2026 range $620-$680 with AI capex translation questions weighing.
The ETH/QQQ ratio is approximately 3.59. The 12-month range is approximately 3.2 to 6.5. The 5-year range is 3.2 to 12.0+ (2021 ETH peak coincident with QQQ in $400 range). Above 6.5 indicates ETH outperformance regime; below 3.2 indicates extreme ETH underperformance (rare territory).
ETH year-to-date 2026 has been roughly flat to modestly negative; QQQ year-to-date approximately +1 percent. The pair has been close to balanced in 2026 versus large divergences in prior years. The 41 percent week-on-week ETH on-chain activity surge in April 2026 may catalyze ETH outperformance if sustained.
Why ETH and QQQ Are Connected
ETH and QQQ share fundamental drivers: Federal Reserve liquidity, growth-stock multiple sensitivity, and tech-narrative momentum. Both depend on long-duration cash-flow valuations sensitive to discount rates and risk appetite.
Three specific channels link them. First, capital allocation: institutional and retail investors with growth/tech-leaning portfolios often hold both QQQ and ETH. Marginal flows between asset classes flow primarily within this growth-tech basket. Second, narrative momentum: AI capex narrative supporting QQQ also supports ETH (Web3-AI integration narratives, AI-on-chain compute). Third, monetary policy: Fed cuts support both QQQ (mega-cap tech multiple expansion) and ETH (long-duration crypto valuation).
The ETH-vs-QQQ pair therefore captures growth-tech leadership rotation between the traditional and crypto sides. When ETH leads QQQ, crypto-specific catalysts dominate (DeFi growth, network upgrades, ETF flows). When QQQ leads ETH, traditional tech catalysts dominate (AI capex translation, mega-cap earnings, software platform growth).
The 2020-2021 ETH Outperformance
From January 2020 through November 2021 ETH peak: ETH gained 4,500 percent (from $130 to $4,800+) versus QQQ +90 percent. ETH/QQQ ratio expanded from 0.7 (early 2020) to 12.0 (November 2021). The 1700 percent ratio expansion was unprecedented.
Drivers: First, DeFi summer 2020: Ethereum hosted Compound, Aave, Uniswap, Curve growth from $1B TVL to $100B+ in 18 months. Second, NFT boom 2021: OpenSea volumes reached $3B+ monthly; Ethereum-based NFT activity drove fee revenues. Third, Layer 2 expansion: Arbitrum, Optimism scaled Ethereum throughput. Fourth, post-Merge transition: ETH transition to proof-of-stake completed September 2022, reducing inflation.
The 2020-2021 ETH outperformance was driven by genuine fundamental growth (network revenue, user growth, capital locked) plus speculative excess. Both contributed.
The 2022 Crypto Winter Drawdown
From November 2021 ATH ($4,800+) to November 2022 trough ($880): ETH fell 82 percent. QQQ fell 35 percent peak-to-trough over same period. ETH underperformed QQQ by 47 percentage points peak-to-trough.
Drivers: First, Fed hiking devastated long-duration assets, with ETH most vulnerable. Second, Luna/UST collapse May 2022 drained $40B from crypto sector. Three Arrows Capital, Voyager, Celsius bankruptcies followed. Third, FTX collapse November 2022 drained another $30B+ and damaged sector trust. Fourth, capital rotation from speculative crypto back to traditional tech (which still had earnings).
The 2022 episode reinforced ETH as 2-3x leveraged QQQ exposure with idiosyncratic crypto stress amplification. The crypto-specific stress (Luna, FTX) amplified the macro hiking-cycle decline.
The 2023-2025 Recovery and Underperformance
From November 2022 ETH low ($880) through August 2025 ETH peak ($4,100): ETH gained 366 percent. QQQ gained approximately 75 percent over similar window. ETH outperformed QQQ during the recovery but by less than the 2020-2021 period (4-to-1 ratio outperformance vs 5-to-1 ratio in prior cycle).
The August 2025 ETH peak of $4,100 was below the November 2021 ATH of $4,800. ETH has not yet exceeded prior cycle highs, while QQQ has substantially exceeded prior highs. This represents a fundamental shift: traditional tech (QQQ) has grown faster than crypto-tech (ETH) during 2022-2025.
The explanation: AI capex cycle benefited NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, META directly with measurable revenue impact. Ethereum benefited indirectly through narrative momentum but without material revenue growth. The fundamental gap has widened.
Volatility and Correlation
ETH realized volatility approximately 70-80 percent annualized vs QQQ 19 percent. The 4x volatility ratio reflects ETH's higher beta plus crypto-specific risks. Each 1 percent QQQ move produces 3-4 percent ETH move on average in correlated regimes.
60-day rolling correlation between ETH and QQQ averages approximately 0.65. During risk-off periods correlation rises to 0.80+; during ETH-specific events (network upgrades, ETF news) drops to 0.40-0.50. Current April 2026 correlation approximately 0.55, reflecting the modest ETH-specific outperformance regime emerging.
The correlation pattern matters for trading. During high-correlation periods (>0.75), the pair functions as a leveraged-QQQ trade. During low-correlation periods (<0.45), ETH-specific factors dominate and the pair tracks crypto-specific events. Current 0.55 is in the middle, with both macro and ETH-specific factors mattering.
The Network Activity Differentiator
Ethereum network activity provides fundamental valuation that QQQ tech stocks do not have at the index level. Each Ethereum transaction generates fees that partly burn (EIP-1559) reducing supply, and partly compensate validators. Aggregate network revenue approximates Ethereum's "earnings."
April 2026 saw 41 percent week-on-week activity surge driven by Layer 2 expansion. Network revenue approximately $30-40 million weekly during the surge. Compared to QQQ's mega-cap tech earnings of approximately $1.5-2 trillion annual run rate, Ethereum network revenue is small but provides direct fundamental signal.
For ETH-vs-QQQ trading, watch Ethereum network activity trends as ETH-specific signal. Strong activity with stable QQQ supports ETH outperformance. Weak activity with stable QQQ signals ETH underperformance. The April 2026 41 percent surge is bullish for ETH outperformance if sustained.
How the Pair Performs in Recessions
Recession history: ETH falls 2-3x QQQ in major risk-off episodes. The 2022 crypto winter: ETH -82 percent vs QQQ -35 percent (47pp ETH underperformance). The 2020 COVID flash crash: ETH -55 percent in 2 weeks vs QQQ -28 percent (27pp). The 2018 crypto winter: ETH -94 percent vs QQQ -10 percent (84pp).
The pattern: ETH amplifies QQQ risk-off moves through 2-3x beta plus crypto-specific stress. Recovery patterns also differ: ETH typically lags QQQ recovery by 6-12 months. 2018-2019 ETH bottomed December 2018 vs QQQ bottomed December 2018; ETH ranged sideways for 18 months while QQQ rallied. 2022-2023 ETH bottomed November 2022 vs QQQ bottomed October 2022; ETH ranged for 12+ months.
For 2026 recession scenarios, expect ETH to underperform QQQ by 30-60 percentage points peak-to-trough. The current ETH price below 2021 ATH provides some valuation cushion, but high beta still applies.
Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool
For pair traders, the ETH/QQQ ratio currently trades at approximately 3.59. The 12-month range is approximately 3.2 to 6.5. The 5-year range is 3.2 to 12.0+ (2021 ETH ATH peak). Above 6.5 indicates ETH outperformance regime emerging; below 3.2 indicates extreme ETH underperformance (rare).
Long ETH / short QQQ captures crypto-specific bet: benefits from continued ETH ETF flows, network activity growth, staking yield improvement, ETH ATH reclaim. Long QQQ / short ETH captures traditional-tech bet: benefits from AI capex translation success, mega-cap earnings beats, ETH ETF outflows, network activity decline. Position sizing should account for ETH 70-80 percent annualized volatility versus QQQ 19 percent (4x).
The pair has produced cyclical returns: 2020-2021 long ETH gained massively (1700pp ratio expansion); 2022-2025 long QQQ gained substantially (~80pp ratio compression). 2026 setup is in transition with potential for either continuation or reversal.
The April 2026 Configuration
ETH $2,353.84 April 23 2026; QQQ $656; ETH/QQQ ratio 3.59. ETH 200-day MA $2,310 support. ETH market cap ~$290B. ETH ETF inflows $11.68B cumulative through April 10. April 41% week-on-week ETH on-chain activity surge.
Forward-looking: April 30 mega-cap tech earnings (Apple, Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon) determine QQQ direction. Strong AI translation evidence pushes QQQ higher and compresses ratio. Disappointment compresses QQQ and supports ETH relative. ETH ETF flow continuation supports ETH. Network activity sustainability is the key ETH-specific signal: continued surge supports ETH outperformance through 2026.
Watch the ETH/QQQ ratio for moves outside 3.2 to 4.5. Below 3.2 indicates extreme ETH underperformance (potential mean-reversion entry). Above 4.5 indicates ETH-specific outperformance regime emerging. The pair offers leveraged tech-beta with crypto-specific factor (network activity, ETF flows, staking yield) overlay.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Ethereum. Computed from 1,266 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) rises 0.46% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.35%. 127 qualifying events; Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) closed positive in 61% of them.
Following these triggers, Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) rises 0.55% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.35%. 127 qualifying events; Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) closed positive in 64% of them.
Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are current ETH and QQQ levels?+
Ethereum closed at $2,353.84 on April 23, 2026; QQQ traded near $656. ETH/QQQ ratio approximately 3.59 (12-month range 3.2-6.5, 5-year range 3.2-12.0+ with 2021 ETH ATH peak). ETH 200-day MA $2,310 acts as support; monthly RSI 52 (neutral). ETH market cap ~$290 billion. Cumulative ETH ETF inflows $11.68B through April 10, 2026. April 2026 saw 41% week-on-week ETH on-chain activity surge driven by Layer 2 expansion.
Why are ETH and QQQ connected?+
Both depend on long-duration cash-flow valuations sensitive to discount rates and risk appetite. Three specific channels: First, capital allocation: institutional and retail investors with growth/tech-leaning portfolios often hold both QQQ and ETH. Marginal flows flow within this growth-tech basket. Second, narrative momentum: AI capex narrative supporting QQQ also supports ETH (Web3-AI integration, AI-on-chain compute). Third, monetary policy: Fed cuts support both QQQ (mega-cap tech multiple expansion) and ETH (long-duration crypto valuation). When ETH leads QQQ, crypto-specific catalysts dominate. When QQQ leads ETH, traditional tech catalysts dominate.
What was the 2020-2021 ETH outperformance?+
From January 2020 through November 2021 ETH peak: ETH +4,500% (from $130 to $4,800+) vs QQQ +90%. ETH/QQQ ratio expanded from 0.7 (early 2020) to 12.0 (November 2021) - 1700% ratio expansion unprecedented. Drivers: DeFi summer 2020 (Compound, Aave, Uniswap, Curve growth from $1B TVL to $100B+ in 18 months); NFT boom 2021 (OpenSea volumes $3B+ monthly); Layer 2 expansion (Arbitrum, Optimism); post-Merge transition (ETH PoS September 2022 reduced inflation). Driven by genuine fundamental growth (network revenue, user growth, capital locked) plus speculative excess.
What was the 2022 crypto winter drawdown?+
From November 2021 ATH ($4,800+) to November 2022 trough ($880): ETH -82%. QQQ -35% peak-to-trough over same period. ETH underperformed QQQ by 47pp peak-to-trough. Drivers: Fed hiking devastated long-duration assets (ETH most vulnerable); Luna/UST collapse May 2022 ($40B drain from crypto sector); Three Arrows Capital, Voyager, Celsius bankruptcies; FTX collapse November 2022 ($30B+ drain, damaged sector trust); capital rotation from speculative crypto back to traditional tech. Reinforced ETH as 2-3x leveraged QQQ exposure with idiosyncratic crypto stress amplification.
How has ETH performed vs QQQ in 2023-2025?+
From November 2022 ETH low ($880) through August 2025 ETH peak ($4,100): ETH +366%. QQQ +~75% over similar window. ETH outperformed QQQ during recovery but less than 2020-2021 (4-to-1 ratio outperformance vs 5-to-1 in prior cycle). August 2025 ETH peak $4,100 below November 2021 ATH $4,800. ETH has NOT yet exceeded prior cycle highs while QQQ has substantially exceeded. Fundamental shift: traditional tech (QQQ) grew faster than crypto-tech (ETH) during 2022-2025. AI capex cycle benefited NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, META directly with measurable revenue impact; ETH benefited indirectly through narrative momentum but without material revenue growth.
How does Ethereum network activity matter?+
Network activity provides fundamental valuation that QQQ tech stocks do not have at index level. Each ETH transaction generates fees: partly burns (EIP-1559 reducing supply), partly compensates validators. Aggregate network revenue approximates Ethereum "earnings." April 2026 saw 41% week-on-week activity surge driven by Layer 2 expansion. Network revenue ~$30-40M weekly during surge. Compared to QQQ mega-cap tech earnings ~$1.5-2T annual run rate, ETH network revenue small but provides direct fundamental signal. Strong activity with stable QQQ supports ETH outperformance; weak activity with stable QQQ signals ETH underperformance.
How volatile is ETH vs QQQ?+
ETH realized volatility ~70-80% annualized vs QQQ 19% (4x ratio reflecting ETH higher beta plus crypto-specific risks). Each 1% QQQ move produces 3-4% ETH move on average. 60-day rolling correlation averages 0.65: rises to 0.80+ during risk-off, drops to 0.40-0.50 during ETH-specific events. Current April 2026 correlation ~0.55. Correlation pattern matters: high-correlation (>0.75) the pair functions as leveraged-QQQ trade; low-correlation (<0.45) ETH-specific factors dominate. Current 0.55 in middle, both macro and ETH-specific factors matter.
How do I trade ETH vs QQQ?+
Track the ETH/QQQ ratio (currently 3.59, 12-month range 3.2-6.5, 5-year range 3.2-12.0+). Above 6.5 indicates ETH outperformance regime; below 3.2 indicates extreme ETH underperformance (rare). Long ETH / short QQQ captures crypto-specific bet: benefits from continued ETH ETF flows, network activity growth, staking yield improvement, ETH ATH reclaim. Long QQQ / short ETH captures traditional-tech bet: benefits from AI capex translation success, mega-cap earnings beats, ETH ETF outflows, network activity decline. Position sizing: ETH 70-80% annualized vol vs QQQ 19% (4x). Recession history: ETH falls 2-3x QQQ in major risk-off episodes (2022 -82% vs -35%; 2020 -55% vs -28%; 2018 -94% vs -10%).
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.