Russell 2000 (IWM) vs 10Y Treasury Yield
IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) tracks 2000 small-cap US stocks. April 2026 IWM approximately $245.
Also known as: Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) (ETF_IWM, Russell 2000, RUT) · 10Y Treasury Yield (10Y yield, 10 year treasury, TNX)
Why This Comparison Matters
IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) tracks 2000 small-cap US stocks. April 2026 IWM approximately $245. 10Y yield 4.31 percent. Small-caps are highly sensitive to credit conditions because they typically have higher proportion of variable-rate debt and bank-loan financing vs investment-grade bonds for large-caps. Approximately 40 percent of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable. Rising 10Y yields pressure IWM through tighter credit conditions and higher refinancing costs. The 2022-2023 period showed IWM severely underperforming SPY as rates rose, reflecting small-cap financial fragility. IWM/SPY ratio has compressed substantially in 2024-2026 reflecting AI capex narrative favoring large-caps.
The April 2026 Configuration
IWM approximately $245 (April 2026). 10Y yield 4.31 percent. IWM AUM approximately $60 billion. Russell 2000 includes 2000 smallest stocks ranked 1001-3000 by market cap.
IWM/SPY ratio approximately 0.346 ($245/$708). 12-month range 0.32-0.40. 5-year range 0.28-0.45. Historical norm 0.40-0.55 (Russell 2000 typically half SPY price). Compressed ratio reflects 2024-2026 AI capex narrative favoring large-caps.
Forty percent of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable. Median profit margins much lower than SPY (~5% Russell 2000 vs ~12% S&P 500).
The combined April 2026 reading: small-caps underperforming despite Fed pause + AI capex narrative absent. Catalyst for IWM outperformance would require either: (1) Fed cut cycle resumption (small-cap credit benefit); (2) economic acceleration favoring cyclicals; (3) value rotation as AI capex narrative exhausts.
Why Small-Caps Are Most Credit-Sensitive
Russell 2000 companies have distinct rate sensitivity profile.
Financing structure: small-caps rely more on bank loans + variable-rate debt vs IG bonds. Approximately 40-50% of Russell 2000 debt is floating-rate vs ~10-15% S&P 500. Higher proportion of bank loans reset to SOFR/Fed funds quickly.
Profitability: 40% of Russell 2000 unprofitable. Cannot offset rising interest expense. Net debt service dominates earnings.
Refinancing risk: small-caps face more refinancing concentration. Maturity walls in 2024-2027 require rolling debt at higher rates. Interest expense rising sharply for small-caps as 2-3% pre-pandemic loans roll to 7-9% current rates.
Liquidity: smaller market caps mean less analyst coverage, lower trading volumes. Risk-off regimes hit small-caps disproportionately due to liquidity premium.
Empirical: 100bp 10Y rise typically associated with 5-10% IWM decline (60-90 day windows). Compare to SPY 5-8%. Small-cap rate sensitivity higher than SPY but offset by cyclical earnings sensitivity.
April 2026 setup: 10Y elevated at 4.31% pressuring small-cap interest expense. Refinancing concentrated in 2024-2027. Profitability concerns persist.
The IWM Underperformance Narrative
2024-2026 era saw IWM underperform SPY substantially. Drivers.
AI capex narrative dominance: Big Tech captured most equity gains. Russell 2000 has limited AI exposure (no NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL). Software/SaaS small-caps had limited AI revenue traction.
Profitability concerns: 40% of Russell 2000 unprofitable. Rising interest expense compressing earnings. Big Tech mega-cap profitability dominant.
Fed pause: Fed paused at 3.50-3.75% (December 2024). Small-caps need Fed cut cycle for credit relief. Pause prolongs interest expense pressure.
CRE concerns: regional banking + commercial real estate concerns affecting small-cap REITs and lenders.
AI-related concentration risk: large-caps have AI capex tailwind. Small-caps face traditional cycle.
Fiscal trajectory: federal spending cuts/tariffs hit small-cap export-oriented and consumer-facing names.
The practical implication: April 2026 IWM/SPY ratio at multi-year lows reflects multi-year underperformance. Mean reversion would require either AI exhaustion or Fed cuts.
How the Pair Performs Through Rate Cycles
2008-09 GFC: IWM -52% peak-to-trough. 10Y 4.5% to 2.0%. Severe stress.
2018-2019: 10Y 2.4% to 3.2% (Q4 2018) then 1.5% (mid-2019). IWM -27% Q4 2018 then +35% through 2019.
2020 COVID: 10Y to 0.5%. IWM -41% peak-to-trough then +90% through 2021 (small-cap rebound rally).
2022 hiking: 10Y 1.5% to 5.0%. IWM -33% peak-to-trough October 2022. Multi-channel hit.
2023 SVB: IWM -10%. Banking + small-cap stress.
2024-2026 AI era: IWM lagged SPY substantially. Modest gains absolute.
2026 Iran war: IWM moderate stress. Defensive rotation away from cyclicals.
Pattern: small-caps highly cyclical. Outperform during recovery (2020-2021); underperform during stress + AI capex era (2022-2026).
How the Pair Performs in Stress
2008-09 GFC: IWM -52% peak-to-trough. 10Y 4.5% to 2.0%.
2011 European debt: IWM -28%.
2018 Q4 Fed pivot: IWM -27%.
2020 COVID: IWM -41% peak-to-trough then +90% through 2021.
2022 hiking: IWM -33%.
2023 SVB: IWM -10%.
2024-2026 AI era: IWM lagged SPY by ~30+ percentage points.
2026 Iran war: IWM moderate weakness.
Pattern: small-caps significant beta to recessions and credit stress. Lagging during AI capex era (large-cap dominant).
Volatility and Trading
IWM realized volatility approximately 22-30% annualized. Higher than SPY. Beta to SPY ~1.20-1.35.
60-day correlation IWM-10Y: -0.30 to -0.50 (negative, weakened in 2024-2026 vs pre-2024 due to AI dominance affecting both).
IWM exposure: IWM ETF (AUM ~$60B), TZA (3x bear), TNA (3x bull). 10Y exposure: TLT or futures.
2022 long TLT / short IWM gained substantially. 2020 COVID rebound long IWM gained 90%. 2024-2026 long SPY / short IWM gained ~30+ percentage points.
Most actionable: Fed policy direction; credit conditions (HY OAS, regional banking); ISM PMI.
Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool
10Y rising + IWM falling: small-cap credit stress. Defensive positioning.
10Y falling + IWM rallying: Fed-cut cycle benefits small-caps most.
10Y rising + IWM rallying: rare. Healthy growth + small-cap recovery.
10Y falling + IWM falling: confirmed recession.
April 2026: 10Y 4.31% + IWM lagging. Configuration suggests IWM underperformance until Fed cuts catalyze.
How IWM-vs-10Y Compares to Other Pairs
IWM/10Y captures small-cap credit cycle. Compared.
Vs SPY/10Y: SPY broader market. Less rate-sensitive than IWM.
Vs QQQ/10Y: QQQ tech-heavy growth. AI capex override.
Vs KRE/10Y: KRE regional banks. Similar credit cycle exposure.
April 2026 reading: 10Y 4.31% + IWM lagging. Configuration suggests Fed cut cycle catalyzes IWM mean reversion.
Forward View: Watch Fed Cuts
IWM ~$245 (April 2026). 10Y 4.31%. IWM/SPY 0.346 (multi-year lows). 40% Russell 2000 unprofitable.
Forward: Fed cut cycle resumption catalyzes IWM. Credit spread compression. AI capex exhaustion would catalyze rotation.
Key watches: Fed FOMC; HY OAS; ISM PMI; Russell 2000 earnings.
Risks: continued Fed pause; AI dominance continues; recession trigger.
Russell 2000 Composition Mechanics
Russell 2000 includes 2000 smallest stocks ranked 1001-3000 by market cap. Reconstitution annual (June). Median market cap approximately $1.5B. Sectors: financials ~17%, healthcare ~16%, industrials ~15%, technology ~14%, consumer discretionary ~10%, energy ~6%, materials ~4%, real estate ~7%, utilities ~3%, communication services ~3%, consumer staples ~3%.
Financials concentration includes regional banks (KRE overlap), small lenders, insurance. Rate-sensitive subsector. Healthcare includes biotech (volatile). Industrials cyclical. Technology smaller than QQQ tech weight.
The practical implication: IWM has higher financials + healthcare biotech exposure + lower mega-cap tech than QQQ/SPY. Different drivers.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How 10Y Treasury Yield has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Computed from 1,242 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, 10Y Treasury Yield rises 0.77% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.50%. 125 qualifying events; 10Y Treasury Yield closed positive in 58% of them.
Following these triggers, 10Y Treasury Yield rises 0.72% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.50%. 125 qualifying events; 10Y Treasury Yield closed positive in 54% of them.
Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are IWM and the 10Y Treasury yield?+
IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) tracks 2000 small-cap US stocks. April 2026 IWM ~$245; AUM ~$60B. Russell 2000 includes 2000 smallest stocks ranked 1001-3000 by market cap. Reconstitution annual (June). Median market cap ~$1.5B. 10Y Treasury yield 4.31% April 2026. IWM/SPY ratio ~0.346 ($245/$708; 12-mo range 0.32-0.40; 5-yr 0.28-0.45; historical norm 0.40-0.55). Compressed reflects 2024-2026 AI capex narrative favoring large-caps. ~40% of Russell 2000 companies unprofitable. Median profit margins much lower than SPY (~5% Russell 2000 vs ~12% S&P 500). Sectors: financials ~17%, healthcare ~16%, industrials ~15%, technology ~14%.
Why are small-caps most credit-sensitive?+
Russell 2000 companies have distinct rate sensitivity profile. Financing structure: small-caps rely more on bank loans + variable-rate debt vs IG bonds. ~40-50% of Russell 2000 debt floating-rate vs ~10-15% S&P 500. Higher proportion bank loans reset to SOFR/Fed funds quickly. Profitability: 40% Russell 2000 unprofitable. Cannot offset rising interest expense. Refinancing risk: maturity walls 2024-2027 require rolling debt at higher rates. Interest expense rising sharply as 2-3% pre-pandemic loans roll to 7-9% current rates. Liquidity: smaller caps less analyst coverage, lower volumes. Risk-off hits disproportionately. Empirical: 100bp 10Y rise = 5-10% IWM decline (vs SPY 5-8%).
Why has IWM underperformed in 2024-2026?+
Multiple drivers. AI capex narrative dominance: Big Tech captured most equity gains. Russell 2000 limited AI exposure (no NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL). Profitability concerns: 40% Russell 2000 unprofitable. Rising interest expense compressing earnings. Fed pause: Fed paused at 3.50-3.75% (December 2024). Small-caps need Fed cut cycle for credit relief. Pause prolongs interest expense pressure. CRE concerns: regional banking + commercial real estate concerns affecting small-cap REITs and lenders. AI-related concentration risk: large-caps have AI capex tailwind. Fiscal trajectory: federal spending cuts/tariffs hit small-cap export-oriented and consumer-facing names. April 2026 IWM/SPY ratio at multi-year lows reflects multi-year underperformance.
How does the pair perform through rate cycles?+
2008-09 GFC: IWM -52% peak-to-trough. 10Y 4.5% to 2.0%. Severe stress. 2018-2019: 10Y 2.4% to 3.2% (Q4 2018) then 1.5% (mid-2019). IWM -27% Q4 2018 then +35% through 2019. 2020 COVID: 10Y to 0.5%. IWM -41% peak-to-trough then +90% through 2021 (small-cap rebound rally). 2022 hiking: 10Y 1.5% to 5.0%. IWM -33% peak-to-trough October 2022. Multi-channel hit. 2023 SVB: IWM -10%. Banking + small-cap stress. 2024-2026 AI era: IWM lagged SPY substantially. Modest gains absolute. 2026 Iran war: IWM moderate stress. Pattern: small-caps highly cyclical. Outperform during recovery; underperform during stress + AI capex era.
How does the pair perform in stress?+
2008-09 GFC: IWM -52% peak-to-trough. 10Y 4.5% to 2.0%. 2011 European debt: IWM -28%. 2018 Q4 Fed pivot: IWM -27%. 2020 COVID: IWM -41% peak-to-trough then +90% through 2021. 2022 hiking: IWM -33%. 2023 SVB: IWM -10%. 2024-2026 AI era: IWM lagged SPY by ~30+ percentage points. 2026 Iran war: IWM moderate weakness. Pattern: small-caps significant beta to recessions and credit stress. Lagging during AI capex era (large-cap dominant).
How is the pair traded?+
IWM realized volatility ~22-30% annualized. Higher than SPY. Beta to SPY ~1.20-1.35. 60-day correlation IWM-10Y -0.30 to -0.50 (negative, weakened in 2024-2026 vs pre-2024). IWM exposure: IWM ETF (AUM ~$60B), TZA (3x bear), TNA (3x bull). 10Y exposure: TLT or futures. 2022 long TLT / short IWM gained substantially. 2020 COVID rebound long IWM gained 90%. 2024-2026 long SPY / short IWM gained ~30+ percentage points. Most actionable: Fed policy direction; credit conditions (HY OAS, regional banking); ISM PMI.
How is the pair used for trading?+
10Y rising + IWM falling: small-cap credit stress. Defensive positioning. 10Y falling + IWM rallying: Fed-cut cycle benefits small-caps most. 10Y rising + IWM rallying: rare. Healthy growth + small-cap recovery. 10Y falling + IWM falling: confirmed recession. April 2026: 10Y 4.31% + IWM lagging. Configuration suggests IWM underperformance until Fed cuts catalyze. Watch Fed FOMC; HY OAS; ISM PMI; Russell 2000 earnings. Risks: continued Fed pause; AI dominance continues; recession trigger.
How does Russell 2000 composition matter?+
Russell 2000 sectors: financials ~17%, healthcare ~16%, industrials ~15%, technology ~14%, consumer discretionary ~10%, energy ~6%, materials ~4%, real estate ~7%, utilities ~3%, communication services ~3%, consumer staples ~3%. Financials concentration includes regional banks (KRE overlap), small lenders, insurance. Rate-sensitive subsector. Healthcare includes biotech (volatile). Industrials cyclical. Technology smaller than QQQ tech weight. IWM has higher financials + healthcare biotech exposure + lower mega-cap tech than QQQ/SPY. Different drivers. Russell 2000 reconstitution annual (June) - removes companies that grew large; adds new small-caps.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.