CONVEX

JPMorgan vs 10Y-2Y Yield Curve

JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and the 10Y-2Y Treasury spread (FRED series T10Y2Y) sit in a textbook bank-NIM relationship that broke down during the 2022-2024 inversion and has reasserted dramatically through the 'Great Un-Inversion' of 2025-2026. The 2s10s spread reached roughly +54 basis points by mid-April 2026 with the 2-year near 3.75 percent and the 10-year near 4.31 percent, the widest steepening since 2022.

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·

Also known as: JPMorgan (JPM) (STK_JPM, JPMorgan) · 10Y-2Y Yield Spread (yield curve, yield spread, 10-2 spread, 2s10s)

Equity Stockdaily
JPMorgan (JPM)
$300.76
7D -1.35%30D -3.07%
Updated
Yield Curve & Ratesdaily
10Y-2Y Yield Spread
50 bps
7D +8.70%30D -7.41%
Updated

Why This Comparison Matters

JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and the 10Y-2Y Treasury spread (FRED series T10Y2Y) sit in a textbook bank-NIM relationship that broke down during the 2022-2024 inversion and has reasserted dramatically through the 'Great Un-Inversion' of 2025-2026. The 2s10s spread reached roughly +54 basis points by mid-April 2026 with the 2-year near 3.75 percent and the 10-year near 4.31 percent, the widest steepening since 2022. JPM's Q1 2026 print on April 14 delivered EPS of $5.94 against an estimate near $5.45, revenue up 10 percent year-over-year to $50.5 billion, net income of $16.5 billion, and 23 percent ROTCE. The bank guided full-year 2026 net interest income to a record $104.5 billion, anchoring the curve-leads-NIM template that the pair was built to capture.

What JPM and the 2s10s spread actually measure

JPMorgan Chase is the largest US bank by assets at roughly $4.0 trillion as of Q1 2026 and the most diversified major bank, with Consumer & Community Banking, Corporate & Investment Bank, Commercial Banking, and Asset & Wealth Management all sized at meaningful contribution. The 2s10s spread is the difference between the 10-year and 2-year constant-maturity Treasury yields, available daily on FRED as T10Y2Y, and is the canonical signal both for recession probability (when inverted) and for bank net-interest-margin tailwinds (when steeply positive).

The textbook relationship runs through the deposit-and-loan repricing channel: banks fund roughly two-thirds of their book through deposits with effective duration under one year, while the loan and securities book has duration concentrated in the 5 to 10-year segment. A positively sloped curve therefore translates mechanically into a positive net interest margin spread, while an inverted curve compresses margins. JPM has historically been the cleanest single-name proxy for this dynamic among the major US banks because of its scale and its diversified deposit base.

The Great Un-Inversion and how the pair reasserted

From July 2022 through August 2024, the 2s10s curve was inverted continuously, hitting a deepest point of -110 basis points in March 2023 (the deepest inversion since 1981). JPM rallied roughly 60 percent over that window despite the textbook NIM headwind, driven by trading revenue strength, the May 2023 First Republic acquisition for $10.6 billion that added roughly $173 billion in assets, and an outsized investment-banking share of capital markets activity that overrode the NIM compression in the deposit-and-loan book.

The pair reasserted from August 2024 onward as the curve disinverted and then steepened. By March 2026 the 2-year had fallen to roughly 3.75 percent on Fed cuts while the 10-year held near 4.30 percent on persistent term-premium widening, opening the +54 basis point spread that prevailed through April 2026 reporting. JPM's April 14 Q1 2026 print captured the steepening directly: net interest income guidance of $104.5 billion for FY2026 is the highest in the bank's history and roughly $7 billion above the Q4 2025 trailing run-rate. The financial-sector outperformance documented in the FinancialContent April 14 bond-market review is the cross-asset confirmation of the pair signal.

Q1 2026 earnings and what the print revealed

JPMorgan's Q1 2026 results (reported April 14, 2026) printed EPS of $5.94 against the consensus near $5.45, a beat of roughly 9 percent. Revenue rose 10 percent year-over-year to $50.5 billion. Net income of $16.5 billion produced 23 percent return on tangible common equity, which is at the high end of the bank's mid-cycle range of 17 to 22 percent that management has historically guided. CET1 ratio finished the quarter at 15.2 percent, well above the regulatory minimum and providing capacity for both buybacks and balance-sheet growth.

The NIM print was the cleanest evidence of the curve-leads-NIM template: NIM expanded to 2.74 percent from 2.66 percent in Q4 2025, the largest sequential expansion since 2022. CFO Jeremy Barnum framed the expansion as deposit beta normalization (rate paid to depositors falling faster than asset yields) combined with reinvestment of the securities book at the higher long end. The full-year 2026 NII guide of $104.5 billion is consistent with continued curve steepening, and the Q2-Q4 EPS guide range of $5.35 to $5.56 implies the FY2026 EPS run-rate of roughly $22 to $23, against current consensus near $21.50.

The historical NIM-to-curve transmission and 2023 break

Across the 2010-2019 cycle, JPM's quarterly NIM moved with a roughly 0.7 correlation to the trailing four-quarter average of the 2s10s spread, with a 2 to 3 quarter lag reflecting the time required for asset and liability books to reprice. The 2023 inversion broke the textbook because deposit-rate stickiness, especially at large banks with sticky transactional deposits, allowed JPM to maintain elevated NIM even as the curve inverted. The typical bank model assumes deposit beta of roughly 0.5 (deposits reprice at half the speed of asset yields) but JPM's 2022-2024 realized beta was closer to 0.3 because of the operating-account mix.

The break worked both ways. JPM did not get the full NIM hit during 2023 inversion, but it also did not get the full NIM tailwind during late 2024 disinversion because deposit costs were already running below the model. The cleanest read of the pair in the current regime is therefore at the directional rather than absolute level: the 2026 curve steepening confirms the directional NIM tailwind, and the $104.5 billion FY2026 NII guide is the institutional confirmation that the relationship is operating within historical bounds even if the levels are somewhat compressed.

What the pair tells you to do in April 2026

The current configuration favors JPM relative to the broader market on the simple template that bank NIM has not yet finished normalizing higher even as the curve has already steepened to +54 basis points. The April 14, 2026 print confirms the FY2026 NII guide and provides quarterly checkpoints through July (Q2), October (Q3) and January 2027 (Q4) for further steepening or NIM upside. Wall Street consensus at the time of the print remained Buy with 19 percent Strong Buy, 44 percent Buy, and 38 percent Hold, against a 12-month target near $329, roughly flat to the current level.

The risk to the long-JPM view is the recession leg of the 2s10s signal: persistent steepening that originates from bull-steepening (front end falling fast on growth deterioration rather than term-premium expansion at the back end) historically precedes credit-cost cycles that compress JPM's earnings beyond what NIM expansion can offset. The April 2026 steepening has been a mix of both, with the 2-year falling on Fed cuts and the 10-year holding on term premium, which is the relatively constructive configuration for the bank earnings template. The actionable read is to scale the JPM long against credit spreads (HY OAS near 280 basis points in April 2026 is tight) and to trim if HY OAS widens to 400-500 basis points.

How CRAI reads the JPM-curve setup

The Convex Risk Appetite Index pulls together credit spreads, equity volatility, and risk-currency moves into a single risk-on or risk-off composite. CRAI was reading risk-on through April 2026 with HY OAS at 280 basis points, IG spreads near 80 basis points (25-year tights), VIX in the high teens, and risk-currency basket performing. That CRAI configuration is the supportive backdrop for the JPM long versus the curve: bank earnings tend to compound in CRAI risk-on regimes when the curve is also positively sloped, the dual condition that prevailed for most of 2017-2018.

The CRAI confirmation matters because the same +54 basis points steepening in a CRAI risk-off regime, with HY OAS widening to 600 basis points and VIX above 30, would be the bull-steepening recession signal rather than the term-premium-expansion NIM tailwind. The pair-and-CRAI reading is therefore the disciplined way to distinguish the supportive 2026 setup from the historical recession analogues.

Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)

How 10Y-2Y Yield Spread has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in JPMorgan (JPM). Computed from 1,239 aligned daily observations ending .

Up-shock
JPMorgan (JPM) top-decile up-day (mean trigger +2.69%)
Mean 5D forward
+0.56%
Median 5D
-2.47%
Edge vs baseline
+4.54 pp
Hit rate (positive)
43%

Following these triggers, 10Y-2Y Yield Spread rises 0.56% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of -3.97%. 124 qualifying events; 10Y-2Y Yield Spread closed positive in 43% of them.

n = 124 trigger events
Down-shock
JPMorgan (JPM) bottom-decile down-day (mean trigger -2.81%)
Mean 5D forward
-52.52%
Median 5D
-4.65%
Edge vs baseline
-48.55 pp
Hit rate (positive)
36%

Following these triggers, 10Y-2Y Yield Spread falls 52.52% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of -3.97%. 124 qualifying events; 10Y-2Y Yield Spread closed positive in 36% of them.

n = 124 trigger events

Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.

90-Day Statistics

JPMorgan (JPM)
90D High
$316.99
90D Low
$282.84
90D Average
$300.88
90D Change
-2.60%
75 data points
10Y-2Y Yield Spread
90D High
62 bps
90D Low
46 bps
90D Average
53 bps
90D Change
-19.35%
64 data points

Explore Each Metric

Related Scenarios & Forecasts

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 2s10s spread and where do I find current data?+

The 2s10s spread, also called T10Y2Y on FRED, is the difference between the 10-year constant-maturity Treasury yield and the 2-year constant-maturity Treasury yield. The Federal Reserve Board publishes both component series daily, and FRED computes T10Y2Y as a derived series back to 1976. As of mid-April 2026 the spread was approximately +54 basis points with the 2-year near 3.75 percent and the 10-year near 4.31 percent.

How does curve steepening help JPMorgan earnings?+

Banks fund roughly two-thirds of their book through deposits with effective duration under one year, while loans and securities sit at 5 to 10-year duration. A positively sloped curve therefore expands net interest margin mechanically as deposit costs reprice slower than asset yields. JPM's Q1 2026 NIM expanded to 2.74 percent from 2.66 percent in Q4 2025, the largest sequential expansion since 2022, and management guided FY2026 NII to a record $104.5 billion.

Why did JPM rally during the 2022-2024 curve inversion?+

Three drivers overrode the NIM headwind during the deepest inversion since 1981 (-110 basis points in March 2023). First, JPM's deposit beta ran near 0.3 versus the textbook assumption of 0.5, so deposit costs rose less than expected. Second, the May 2023 First Republic acquisition added roughly $173 billion in assets at favorable terms. Third, capital markets revenue benefited from the volatility cycle. The 60 percent JPM rally during a deep inversion is the historical reminder that the textbook bank-NIM template has multiple working channels.

What did the April 14 Q1 2026 JPMorgan earnings show?+

JPMorgan's Q1 2026 print delivered EPS of $5.94 against consensus near $5.45 (9 percent beat), revenue up 10 percent year-over-year to $50.5 billion, net income of $16.5 billion, and 23 percent ROTCE. NIM expanded to 2.74 percent from 2.66 percent. CET1 ratio at 15.2 percent. Management guided FY2026 NII to a record $104.5 billion and Q2-Q4 EPS in a $5.35 to $5.56 range. Consensus rating remained Buy with 12-month target near $329.

Is the 2026 curve steepening a recession signal or a NIM tailwind?+

It depends on the source. Bull-steepening (front end falling fast on growth deterioration) historically precedes credit-cost cycles that compress bank earnings. Bear-steepening or term-premium-driven steepening (back end rising on supply or inflation concerns) is the cleaner NIM tailwind. The April 2026 steepening is a mix of both, with the 2-year falling on Fed cuts and the 10-year holding on term-premium expansion. The cross-check against credit spreads is the discriminator: HY OAS at 280 basis points and IG at 80 basis points support the constructive read.

How do I read JPM versus the curve alongside CRAI?+

The Convex Risk Appetite Index combines credit spreads, equity volatility, and risk-currency moves into a single composite. A CRAI risk-on configuration with steepening curve historically supports JPM compounding (the dominant 2017-2018 setup). A CRAI risk-off configuration with steepening curve flags the bull-steepening recession case. April 2026 CRAI is risk-on, which is why the pair signal is currently reading as the constructive NIM tailwind rather than the recession warning.

What should I watch for a JPM-curve breakdown?+

Three triggers would break the constructive read. First, HY OAS widening from 280 to above 400 basis points would signal credit-cycle deterioration that compresses JPM provisions. Second, deposit-beta normalization above 0.5 would compress NIM faster than the curve steepens. Third, a flattening of the curve back toward inversion would remove the directional tailwind. Quarterly NII run-rates and provision-for-credit-losses prints in July, October, and January 2027 are the natural checkpoints.

Related Comparisons

Explore Across Convex

Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.