CONVEX

Regional Banks (KRE) vs 10Y Treasury Yield

KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) tracks 100+ regional banks (mid-cap and smaller). April 2026: KRE $66.66 (up 13.33 percent YTD); AUM $3.45 billion; PE ratio 13.45; beta 1.42 (5-year monthly); expense ratio 0.35 percent.

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·

Also known as: Regional Banks (KRE) (ETF_KRE, regional banks) · 10Y Treasury Yield (10Y yield, 10 year treasury, TNX)

Equity Sectordaily
Regional Banks (KRE)
$66.97
7D -1.85%30D -4.83%
Updated
Yield Curve & Ratesdaily
10Y Treasury Yield
4.47%
7D +0.22%30D +4.93%
Updated

Why This Comparison Matters

KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) tracks 100+ regional banks (mid-cap and smaller). April 2026: KRE $66.66 (up 13.33 percent YTD); AUM $3.45 billion; PE ratio 13.45; beta 1.42 (5-year monthly); expense ratio 0.35 percent. The 10-year Treasury yield (FRED DGS10) sits at 4.31 percent. Regional banks have complex rate sensitivity: rising short rates expand NIM through deposit-loan spread; falling long yields destroy bond portfolio value (held-to-maturity unrealized losses); rising long yields can also pressure CRE loan quality. KRE sold off sharply in 2023 March SVB crisis (-40 percent) as duration losses + deposit flight dominated. April 2026 KRE recovered substantially with deposits stable + NIM expansion + Fed pause supportive.

The April 2026 Configuration

KRE traded $66.66-$68.86 range mid-to-late April 2026. YTD +13.33 percent (April 24 2026 data). AUM $3.45 billion. NAV $67.08. PE ratio 13.45. Beta 1.42 (5-year monthly, 1.4x SPY volatility). Dividend yield 2.51 percent. Expense ratio 0.35 percent. 10Y Treasury yield 4.31 percent (April 2026).

KRE composition (~100+ holdings): top weights typically include US Bancorp (USB), PNC Financial (PNC), Truist Financial (TFC), M&T Bank (MTB), Citizens Financial (CFG), Regions Financial (RF), Western Alliance (WAL), Zions Bancorporation (ZION), Comerica (CMA), Huntington Bancshares (HBAN), Fifth Third (FITB), KeyCorp (KEY), New York Community Bancorp (NYCB).

The combined April 2026 reading: KRE rallying +13.33 percent YTD reflects: (1) recovery from 2023 SVB crisis lows; (2) NIM expansion from elevated 10Y; (3) Fed pause stable deposit costs; (4) CRE concerns moderating; (5) regional bank earnings recovering Q1 2026. The configuration is bank-friendly with KRE +13 percent YTD vs SPY -2.5 percent YTD (KRE substantially outperforming SPY in 2026).

KRE's Complex Rate Sensitivity

KRE has more complex rate sensitivity than XLF (which is large-cap dominated). Three competing channels.

NIM channel: rising short rates expand deposit-loan spread for regional banks. Regional banks have higher proportion of deposits (vs wholesale funding) than money centers. Rising rates expand NIM more directly. KRE positive sensitivity through this channel.

Duration channel: regional banks have larger held-to-maturity (HTM) Treasury and MBS portfolios as percentage of assets. Falling long yields raise HTM market value (bond portfolio gain). Rising long yields create unrealized losses (HTM mark-to-market negative). KRE negative sensitivity through this channel.

CRE channel: regional banks have outsized exposure to commercial real estate (~$1.4 trillion CRE loans across regional banking system). Rising long yields hurt CRE values (cap rates expand). Falling yields support CRE values. KRE negative sensitivity through CRE channel.

April 2026 setup: 10Y stable at 4.31 percent. NIM expansion ongoing (NIM channel positive). HTM losses partially absorbing (duration channel modestly positive as 10Y stable). CRE concerns moderating (CRE channel positive). Net: bank-friendly configuration.

The practical implication: KRE response to 10Y depends on direction + macro context. Rising rates with stable economy: KRE positive (NIM expansion). Rising rates with banking stress (2023 SVB): KRE negative (HTM losses + deposit flight). Falling rates with recession: KRE negative (CRE losses + deposit flight). Falling rates with Fed pre-emptive cuts: KRE positive (HTM gains + economic support).

The 2023 SVB Crisis Legacy

The March 2023 SVB collapse (March 10) catalyzed regional banking stress. KRE fell from $58 (early 2023) to $35 (May 2023 trough), -40 percent peak-to-trough. Multiple regional bank failures: SVB ($209 billion assets), Signature ($110 billion), First Republic ($229 billion). Total $548 billion regional banking failures.

Drivers of 2023 stress. Treasury duration losses: regional banks held substantial Treasury bonds in HTM portfolios. Rapid rate rise (10Y from 1.5 percent to 5 percent) created massive unrealized losses. Deposit flight: depositors moved deposits from regional banks to money centers (deemed safer) and money market funds (higher yield). Run dynamics: SVB-specific bank run accelerated industry-wide concerns.

BTFP (Bank Term Funding Program): Fed announced March 12, 2023 emergency facility allowing banks to borrow at par against Treasury collateral. Peaked at $170 billion. Provided liquidity backstop preventing broader contagion. Closed gradually through 2024.

KRE recovery 2024-2026: from $35 (May 2023 low) to $66.66 (April 2026), +90 percent peak-to-trough. Recovery drivers: (1) deposits stabilized as Fed pause confirmed; (2) NIM expansion provided earnings buffer; (3) BTFP backstop reassured market; (4) HTM losses partially recovered as 10Y stabilized; (5) M&A activity (NYCB acquisition, multiple deals).

The practical implication: KRE remains sensitive to banking stress signals. Watch deposit trends, HTM losses, CRE concerns. April 2026 KRE near 52-week highs reflects market belief stress contained.

How KRE and XLF Differ

KRE and XLF serve different banking exposures. XLF dominated by money centers (JPM 11%, BAC 5%, etc.) plus insurance, payment networks, capital markets. KRE pure-play regional banking (100+ regional banks).

Key differences. Concentration: XLF top 5 ~40% (Berkshire, JPM, Visa, Mastercard, BofA). KRE top 5 ~25% (more diversified across regionals). Beta: KRE 1.42 (more volatile); XLF approximately 1.10-1.15. Composition: XLF includes payment networks (Visa, Mastercard) buffering bank-specific risk. KRE pure regional bank exposure.

Rate sensitivity profile. XLF: pure NIM beneficiary from rising rates. Limited HTM exposure (money centers have wholesale funding dominant). KRE: complex profile (NIM positive + HTM negative + CRE negative). Higher beta to rate moves.

April 2026: KRE +13.33 percent YTD vs XLF +5-7 percent YTD. KRE outperforming XLF reflects: (1) regional bank crisis recovery story (KRE recovering from 2023 lows); (2) higher beta to rate stability; (3) CRE moderation theme; (4) M&A activity benefiting smaller banks.

The practical implication: KRE-vs-XLF spread reveals whether regional banks are recovering or stressing. April 2026 KRE outperformance signals recovery confirmed.

How the Pair Performs Through Rate Cycles

Three rate-cycle examples.

2018-2019: 10Y rose 2.4 percent to 3.2 percent (Q4 2018 peak), then fell to 1.5 percent (mid-2019). KRE fell 23 percent peak-to-trough Q4 2018, then rallied modestly through 2019. Both NIM compression (10Y fall) and HTM gains.

2020 COVID: 10Y fell 1.9 percent to 0.5 percent (March 2020). KRE fell 50 percent peak-to-trough COVID flash crash. Multiple negative channels: NIM compression, recession-related credit concerns, deposit flight.

2022 hiking: 10Y rose 1.5 percent to 5.0 percent peak. KRE fell 33 percent peak-to-trough October 2022. HTM losses dominated NIM benefits.

2023 March SVB crisis: KRE crashed to $35 (-40 percent). Banking stress dominant.

2024 stabilization: KRE recovered to $50-55. Deposits stabilized.

2025 continued recovery: KRE rallied to $60-65.

2026: KRE $66.66 (+13.33 percent YTD). 10Y stable at 4.31 percent. Bank-friendly configuration.

The pattern: KRE more volatile than XLF through rate cycles. 2022 hiking + 2023 SVB created banking stress. 2024-2026 recovery as Fed paused + deposits stabilized.

How the Pair Performs in Stress

Stress history.

2008-09 GFC: KRE -78 percent peak-to-trough (worst sub-sector). 10Y fell 4.5 percent to 2.0 percent. Regional banks epicenter (mortgage exposure). Recovery slow over 2009-2013.

2011 European debt: KRE -25 percent. Modest stress.

2018 Q4 Fed pivot: KRE -23 percent Q4 2018.

2020 COVID: KRE -50 percent peak-to-trough. Multiple negative channels.

2022 hiking: KRE -33 percent peak-to-trough October 2022. HTM losses dominant.

2023 March SVB crisis: KRE -40 percent peak-to-trough. SVB, Signature, First Republic failures.

2024-2026 recovery: KRE +90 percent from May 2023 lows to April 2026 highs.

2026 Iran war: KRE held near highs. Iran shock not banking-specific.

The pattern: KRE most volatile bank measure. 2008 GFC was epicenter (mortgage exposure). 2023 SVB was second-most severe stress. 2024-2026 recovery substantial. Forward stress catalysts: CRE (commercial real estate) deterioration; deposit flight; HTM losses if 10Y rises sharply.

Volatility and Trading

KRE realized volatility approximately 22-30 percent annualized (vs XLF 16-22 percent, SPY 13-18 percent). Beta 1.42 to SPY (5-year monthly). Higher than XLF beta ~1.10-1.15.

60-day rolling correlation between KRE and 10Y: 0.40-0.65 (positive, strengthens during steepening regimes; weakens during banking stress when negative correlation can emerge).

For pair-trade implementation: KRE exposure through KRE ETF (most liquid regional bank ETF, AUM $3.45 billion) or IAT (iShares US Regional Banks). 10Y yield exposure through TLT or 10Y futures (TY).

The pair has produced cyclical returns. 2024-2026 long KRE / short TLT gained substantially (KRE +90% from May 2023 lows). 2008-09 GFC long TLT / short KRE gained dramatically (KRE -78%, TLT +37%). 2023 March SVB long TLT / short KRE gained (KRE -40%, TLT moderate gains).

Most actionable: monitor banking stress signals. Deposit trends (Fed H.8 weekly bank credit), HTM unrealized losses (FDIC quarterly), CRE delinquencies (FDIC), bank earnings (quarterly). April 2026 KRE near 52-week highs reflects bank-friendly configuration but watch for inflection signals.

Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool

For macro allocators, KRE-vs-10Y provides regional banking cycle classification.

10Y rising + KRE rallying: healthy bank cycle (current April 2026). NIM expansion + recovery story. Long KRE benefits.

10Y rising + KRE falling: banking stress (2023 SVB pattern). HTM losses dominant. Avoid KRE.

10Y falling + KRE rallying: Fed-cutting recovery. HTM gains + economic support. Long KRE.

10Y falling + KRE falling: confirmed banking stress + recession. 2008 GFC pattern. Long TLT short KRE.

April 2026 setup: 10Y at 4.31 percent + KRE at $66.66 (+13.33% YTD). Healthy bank cycle. Continued NIM strength + recovery momentum.

Key watches: Q2 2026 regional bank earnings (July 2026). Fed FOMC May 6-7 for policy implications. Deposit trends (weekly Fed H.8). FDIC quarterly bank earnings (Q1 2026 release May). HTM unrealized losses (any 10Y surge would re-create losses). CRE delinquency trends.

How KRE-vs-10Y Compares to Other Sector-vs-Rates Pairs

KRE/10Y captures regional bank cycle. Compared to other sector-vs-rates pairs.

Vs XLF/10Y: XLF dominated by money centers + insurance + payments. KRE pure regional bank (higher beta, more rate-sensitive HTM). KRE outperforms XLF in healthy bank cycle (higher beta); underperforms in stress (more vulnerable).

Vs XLU/10Y: XLU bond proxy + AI data center demand. Different sensitivity profile. April 2026 both at highs but for different reasons.

Vs XLRE/10Y: XLRE REITs duration-sensitive. KRE banking-cycle. Different drivers.

Vs XLK/10Y: XLK tech with AI capex narrative. Different from bank cycle.

For allocator monitoring, KRE/10Y is foundational regional banking cycle indicator. April 2026 reading: 10Y 4.31 percent + KRE $66.66 (+13.33% YTD healthy recovery). Pair complements XLF/10Y (broader financials), XLU/10Y (utility), XLRE/10Y (REITs), banking-specific signals (KRE/XLF spread, KBW vs SPY) for comprehensive bank cycle read.

Forward View: Watch CRE and Deposit Trends

KRE $66.66 (April 24 2026), 10Y yield 4.31 percent. KRE +13.33 percent YTD vs SPY -2.5 percent YTD. KRE recovered +90 percent from May 2023 SVB crisis lows. PE 13.45; beta 1.42.

Forward-looking through 2026: continued 10Y stability at 4-4.5 percent supports NIM expansion. Deposit base stabilized after 2023 stress. CRE concerns moderating but remain key risk. Regional bank Q1 2026 earnings strong (NIM expansion + provisions stable + fee income recovering).

Key watches. Q2 2026 regional bank earnings (July 2026). Fed FOMC meetings (May 6-7, June 17-18) for policy direction. Weekly Fed H.8 (deposit trends, lending). FDIC quarterly bank earnings + HTM losses (Q1 2026 release May). CRE delinquencies (any sharp rise would catalyze KRE selloff). Office sector vacancy trends.

Risk factors: 10Y surge above 5 percent would re-create HTM losses; CRE deterioration accelerating; deposit flight resumption; M&A activity slowdown; Fed cut acceleration compressing NIMs.

Expected KRE range $63-$70 absent major catalyst. 10Y range 4.0-4.5 percent. Configuration suggests continued regional bank cycle recovery absent banking stress reversal.

Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)

How 10Y Treasury Yield has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Regional Banks (KRE). Computed from 1,242 aligned daily observations ending .

Up-shock
Regional Banks (KRE) top-decile up-day (mean trigger +3.44%)
Mean 5D forward
+0.28%
Median 5D
+0.24%
Edge vs baseline
-0.23 pp
Hit rate (positive)
54%

Following these triggers, 10Y Treasury Yield rises 0.28% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.50%. 125 qualifying events; 10Y Treasury Yield closed positive in 54% of them.

n = 125 trigger events
Down-shock
Regional Banks (KRE) bottom-decile down-day (mean trigger -3.33%)
Mean 5D forward
+0.85%
Median 5D
+0.70%
Edge vs baseline
+0.35 pp
Hit rate (positive)
58%

Following these triggers, 10Y Treasury Yield rises 0.85% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.50%. 125 qualifying events; 10Y Treasury Yield closed positive in 58% of them.

n = 125 trigger events

Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.

90-Day Statistics

Regional Banks (KRE)
90D High
$71.9
90D Low
$62.62
90D Average
$67.62
90D Change
-6.37%
76 data points
10Y Treasury Yield
90D High
4.47%
90D Low
3.97%
90D Average
4.27%
90D Change
+10.37%
63 data points

Explore Each Metric

Related Scenarios & Forecasts

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are KRE and the 10Y Treasury yield?+

KRE (SPDR S&P Regional Banking ETF) tracks 100+ regional banks (mid-cap and smaller). April 2026: KRE $66.66 (up 13.33% YTD); AUM $3.45 billion; PE ratio 13.45; beta 1.42 (5-year monthly, 1.4x SPY volatility); expense ratio 0.35%; dividend yield 2.51%. Top holdings: US Bancorp, PNC, Truist, M&T Bank, Citizens Financial, Regions Financial, Western Alliance, Zions, Comerica, Huntington, Fifth Third, KeyCorp, NYCB. 10Y Treasury yield 4.31% April 2026. KRE substantially outperforming SPY in 2026 (+13.33% vs -2.5%). Recovered +90% from May 2023 SVB crisis lows ($35 trough to $66.66).

Why is KRE rate sensitivity complex?+

Three competing channels. NIM channel: rising short rates expand deposit-loan spread. Regional banks have higher proportion of deposits (vs wholesale funding) than money centers. Rising rates expand NIM more directly. KRE positive sensitivity. Duration channel: regional banks have larger HTM Treasury/MBS portfolios as % of assets. Falling long yields raise HTM market value (gain). Rising long yields create unrealized losses (negative). KRE negative sensitivity. CRE channel: regional banks have outsized exposure to commercial real estate (~$1.4T CRE loans across regional system). Rising yields hurt CRE values; falling yields support. April 2026 setup: 10Y stable at 4.31% (NIM positive, HTM stable, CRE moderating). Net bank-friendly.

What is the 2023 SVB crisis legacy?+

March 2023 SVB collapse (March 10) catalyzed regional banking stress. KRE fell $58 (early 2023) to $35 (May 2023 trough), -40% peak-to-trough. Multiple failures: SVB ($209B assets), Signature ($110B), First Republic ($229B). Total $548B failures. Drivers: Treasury duration losses (10Y 1.5% to 5% created HTM losses); deposit flight to money centers + MMFs; SVB-specific bank run accelerated industry concerns. BTFP March 12 2023: Fed emergency facility allowing banks to borrow at par against Treasury collateral. Peaked $170B. Closed gradually through 2024. Recovery 2024-2026: KRE +90% from May 2023 low to April 2026 high. Drivers: deposits stabilized as Fed paused, NIM expansion, BTFP backstop, HTM partial recovery, M&A activity.

How do KRE and XLF differ?+

XLF dominated by money centers (JPM 11%, BAC 5%) plus insurance, payment networks, capital markets. KRE pure-play regional banking (100+ regional banks). Concentration: XLF top 5 ~40%; KRE top 5 ~25%. Beta: KRE 1.42 (more volatile); XLF ~1.10-1.15. Rate sensitivity: XLF pure NIM beneficiary (limited HTM exposure - money centers have wholesale funding); KRE complex profile (NIM positive + HTM negative + CRE negative). April 2026: KRE +13.33% YTD vs XLF +5-7% YTD. KRE outperforming XLF reflects: regional bank crisis recovery story; higher beta to rate stability; CRE moderation theme; M&A activity benefiting smaller banks.

How does the pair perform through rate cycles?+

2018-2019: 10Y 2.4% to 3.2% (Q4 2018) then 1.5% (mid-2019). KRE -23% Q4 2018 then rallied modestly through 2019. 2020 COVID: 10Y 1.9% to 0.5%. KRE -50% peak-to-trough COVID flash crash. Multiple negative channels: NIM compression, recession credit concerns, deposit flight. 2022 hiking: 10Y 1.5% to 5.0% peak. KRE -33% peak-to-trough October 2022. HTM losses dominated NIM benefits. 2023 March SVB: KRE crashed to $35 (-40%). Banking stress dominant. 2024 stabilization: KRE recovered $50-55. 2025 recovery: $60-65. 2026: $66.66 (+13.33% YTD). 10Y stable 4.31%. Bank-friendly. Pattern: KRE more volatile than XLF.

How does the pair perform in stress?+

2008-09 GFC: KRE -78% peak-to-trough (worst sub-sector). 10Y 4.5% to 2.0%. Regional banks epicenter (mortgage exposure). 2011 European debt: KRE -25%. 2018 Q4 Fed pivot: KRE -23%. 2020 COVID: KRE -50%. 2022 hiking: KRE -33%. HTM losses dominant. 2023 March SVB: KRE -40%. Banking failures (SVB, Signature, First Republic $548B total). 2024-2026 recovery: KRE +90% from May 2023 lows to April 2026 highs. 2026 Iran war: KRE held near highs (not banking-specific). Pattern: KRE most volatile bank measure. 2008 GFC was epicenter (mortgage). 2023 SVB second-most severe. Forward catalysts: CRE deterioration; deposit flight; HTM losses if 10Y rises sharply.

How is the pair traded?+

KRE realized volatility ~22-30% annualized (vs XLF 16-22%, SPY 13-18%). Beta 1.42 to SPY. 60-day correlation KRE-10Y 0.40-0.65 (positive, strengthens during steepening; weakens during banking stress when negative emerges). KRE exposure: KRE ETF (AUM $3.45B) or IAT (iShares US Regional Banks). 10Y exposure: TLT or 10Y futures. 2024-2026 long KRE / short TLT gained substantially (KRE +90% from May 2023 lows). 2008-09 GFC long TLT / short KRE gained dramatically (KRE -78%, TLT +37%). Most actionable: monitor banking stress signals. Deposit trends (Fed H.8 weekly), HTM unrealized losses (FDIC quarterly), CRE delinquencies, bank earnings.

How is the pair used for trading?+

10Y rising + KRE rallying: healthy bank cycle (current April 2026). NIM expansion + recovery story. Long KRE benefits. 10Y rising + KRE falling: banking stress (2023 SVB pattern). HTM losses dominant. Avoid KRE. 10Y falling + KRE rallying: Fed-cutting recovery. HTM gains + economic support. Long KRE. 10Y falling + KRE falling: confirmed banking stress + recession (2008 GFC). Long TLT short KRE. April 2026: 10Y 4.31% + KRE $66.66 (+13.33% YTD). Healthy bank cycle. Watch Q2 2026 regional bank earnings, Fed FOMC May 6-7, deposit trends Fed H.8, FDIC quarterly HTM losses, CRE delinquency trends.

Related Comparisons

Explore Across Convex

Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.