Amazon (AMZN) vs Microsoft (MSFT)
Amazon traded at $250.56 in mid-April 2026 with market capitalization $2.84 trillion. Microsoft traded near $415 with market capitalization $3.14 trillion.
Also known as: Amazon (AMZN) (STK_AMZN, Amazon) · Microsoft (MSFT) (STK_MSFT, Microsoft)
Why This Comparison Matters
Amazon traded at $250.56 in mid-April 2026 with market capitalization $2.84 trillion. Microsoft traded near $415 with market capitalization $3.14 trillion. The MSFT/AMZN market cap ratio of 1.11x has narrowed from 1.40x in early 2024 as AMZN regained ground through AWS acceleration. The pair captures the cloud market leadership war: AWS at $142 billion annualized (32 percent market share) vs Azure at $90 billion (25 percent). Both compete head-to-head for hyperscale cloud and AI workloads, with the customer-supplier relationship absent (each builds infrastructure separately). Combined 2026 capex commitments of $310 to $320 billion ($200 billion AMZN + $110 to $120 billion MSFT) represent the largest two-company capital deployment in tech history.
AMZN and MSFT: The Cloud Duopoly Plus
Amazon and Microsoft are the two largest cloud infrastructure providers globally. Q4 2025 / Q2 fiscal 2026: AWS revenue $35.6 billion (annualized $142 billion, 32 percent market share); Azure revenue approximately $22 billion (annualized $90 billion, 25 percent market share). Combined the two represent 57 percent of cloud infrastructure spending, with Google Cloud (11 percent), Alibaba Cloud (5 percent), Oracle Cloud (3 percent), and others making up the remainder.
The pair captures the cloud leadership war. AWS holds first position by share but Azure has been growing faster (39 percent constant currency in Q2 fiscal 2026 vs AWS 24 percent). The 14 percentage point growth differential has narrowed AWS's share lead from 8 percentage points in 2022 to 7 points in 2026. Markets reward MSFT for the share gain trajectory; AMZN gets credit for absolute revenue scale and AI-specific revenue acceleration.
AWS vs Azure Growth Rates
AWS Q4 2025 growth was 24 percent year-on-year, the highest in 6 quarters. Azure Q2 fiscal 2026 growth was 39 percent in constant currency. The 15 percentage point growth gap has been the central pair driver: when Azure pulls further ahead in growth, MSFT outperforms AMZN; when AWS narrows the gap, AMZN outperforms MSFT.
The growth rate convergence has been driven by AI-specific revenue. AWS AI-specific revenue (Bedrock, SageMaker, Trainium, Inferentia) crossed $10 billion annualized in Q4 2025, growing triple-digit percentages. Azure AI revenue is approximately 15 to 20 percent of Azure (estimated $13 to $18 billion annualized), also growing rapidly. Both companies are competing for the same AI workload share, with MSFT-OpenAI partnership giving Azure first-mover advantage and AMZN-Anthropic partnership providing alternative AI model exposure. The competition is intense and will define the pair through 2026 to 2028.
Capex Race: $200 Billion vs $110 Billion
Amazon's 2026 capex commitment of approximately $200 billion is the largest single-year capex in US corporate history. Microsoft's $110 to $120 billion fiscal 2026 capex is the third-largest (after AMZN and ahead of GOOGL's $175 to $185 billion calendar 2026). Combined AMZN + MSFT capex approaches $320 billion in 2026 across overlapping AI infrastructure investments.
The capex differential favors AMZN scale-up. AMZN has historically run lower capex than MSFT despite being larger by revenue; the 2026 reversal reflects AMZN's aggressive AI infrastructure investment thesis. Both companies are buying NVIDIA accelerators at scale, building data centers, and developing custom AI silicon (AMZN Trainium and Inferentia, MSFT Maia and Cobalt). The combined $320 billion capex flowing largely to NVIDIA produces an estimated $80 to $120 billion of NVDA revenue in 2026 to 2027.
AMZN vs MSFT Through the AI Cycle
From November 2022 through April 2026, AMZN gained approximately 195 percent versus MSFT 75 percent. The 120 percentage point AMZN outperformance reflects two factors: AMZN's post-2022 recovery from a deeper drawdown (AMZN was at $85 in November 2022 versus MSFT at $235), and AWS's sustained growth supporting AMZN through cycles when MSFT faced capex-revenue concerns.
The AMZN/MSFT market cap ratio has held a 0.80 to 1.00x range through 2024 to 2026. April 2026 ratio is approximately 0.90x ($2.84T / $3.14T). The ratio peaked at 1.05x in late 2024 (AMZN approaching MSFT in valuation), bottomed at 0.55x in mid-2024 (MSFT outperforming AMZN on Azure-OpenAI thesis). The mean-reversion in the pair has been substantial: 70 to 80 percent of large divergences resolve within 6 to 12 months, making the pair one of the more reliable mega-cap mean-reversion trades.
The Anthropic vs OpenAI Battle
Microsoft's relationship with OpenAI ($13 billion invested, 49 percent economic interest, exclusive Azure cloud through 2030) and Amazon's relationship with Anthropic ($8 billion invested, AWS as primary cloud) define the cloud-AI partnership landscape. The two relationships are structurally similar (cloud-exclusive partnerships with frontier AI labs) but differ in scale and exclusivity.
OpenAI has approximately 600 to 700 million ChatGPT MAU; Anthropic has smaller user base but stronger enterprise positioning. OpenAI's consumer-product dominance gives MSFT visibility into broader AI adoption trends. Anthropic's enterprise focus produces deeper Fortune 500 relationships, supporting AWS's enterprise AI workloads. Markets price MSFT-OpenAI at higher value than AMZN-Anthropic given OpenAI's scale, but the gap has narrowed in 2025 to 2026 as Anthropic enterprise adoption has accelerated.
The April 2026 Configuration
AMZN at $250 and MSFT at $415 reflects ratio of 0.60. The combined market caps of approximately $6 trillion represent approximately 15 percent of the S&P 500 weight. Both companies report fiscal Q1 2026 / Q3 fiscal 2026 on April 30, 2026 (same day), producing simultaneous comparison data.
Key items for AMZN Q1: revenue approximately $151 billion (consensus +12 percent YoY), AWS growth above 22 percent, capex update versus the $200 billion 2026 guidance. Key items for MSFT Q3: revenue approximately $74 to $76 billion, Azure growth between 35 and 40 percent (consensus 38 percent), commercial RPO update (current $625 billion). The dual earnings on April 30 will be the most consequential AMZN-vs-MSFT data point of 2026, revealing whether AMZN maintains its 2025 acceleration trajectory or whether MSFT regains relative outperformance.
Revenue Composition Differences
AMZN revenue is more diversified than MSFT despite both being mega-cap tech. AMZN Q4 2025 revenue $213.4 billion broken down: North America retail $115.6 billion (54 percent), International retail $43.4 billion (20 percent), AWS $35.6 billion (17 percent), Advertising $21.3 billion (10 percent). The retail exposure (74 percent combined) creates consumer-cycle sensitivity that MSFT does not have.
MSFT Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue $81.3 billion: Microsoft Cloud $51.5 billion (63 percent), productivity software approximately $20 billion (25 percent), gaming approximately $5.5 billion (7 percent), other approximately $4.3 billion (5 percent). Cloud and software dominance produces more stable revenue trajectory and higher gross margins (70+ percent) compared to AMZN's blended 45 percent gross margin (retail margins much lower than cloud). The composition difference is structural.
Where the Pair Diverges
Three AMZN-specific factors produce moves disconnected from MSFT. First, retail dynamics: Prime Day events, holiday season retail performance, tariff-driven margin pressure. The Trump 2.0 tariff regime announced February 2026 included specific concerns for AMZN due to 30+ percent of marketplace GMV from Chinese sellers. Second, AWS quarterly results: each Q4 January release moves AMZN 5 to 12 percent. Third, capex commentary: the $200 billion 2026 capex announcement compressed AMZN by 8 percent.
Three MSFT-specific factors produce moves. First, Azure quarterly prints: each cloud growth report moves MSFT 3 to 6 percent. Second, capex announcements: late January 2026 5 percent decline. Third, OpenAI partnership news. The April 30, 2026 simultaneous fiscal Q1/Q3 release will be the dominant near-term comparison catalyst.
The Free Cash Flow Profiles
AMZN free cash flow has been volatile. 2024 FCF was approximately $50 billion; 2025 FCF approximately $70 billion despite massively higher capex. The volatility reflects AMZN's capital-intensive retail and cloud build-out cycles. MSFT FY2026 estimated FCF is approximately $70 to $80 billion, more stable than AMZN.
Over multi-year horizons, MSFT has produced more predictable FCF generation; AMZN has produced more growth-investment-driven FCF volatility. For investors prioritizing stable cash flow, MSFT is the more attractive position. For investors comfortable with capital intensity in exchange for AWS scale advantages, AMZN is the more attractive option. The pair captures the trade-off between predictable FCF (MSFT) and AWS scale (AMZN). The April 30 dual earnings will reveal Q1 FCF dynamics for both.
Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool
For practical use: track the AMZN/MSFT market cap ratio. April 2026 ratio is approximately 0.90x ($2.84T / $3.14T). The ratio has held a 0.80 to 1.00 range through 2024 to 2026, with peaks at 1.05x in late 2024 and trough at 0.55x in mid-2024.
For pair trading: long AMZN / short MSFT captures cloud market share recovery and retail-cycle exposure with hedged enterprise software risk. The trade benefits from AWS growth above 25 percent, retail growth above 10 percent, advertising acceleration, and Anthropic ecosystem expansion. Long MSFT / short AMZN captures Azure-OpenAI thesis with hedged retail risk; benefits from Azure growth above 40 percent, Copilot acceleration, RPO growth above 50 percent. Both stocks have similar realized volatility (AMZN 28 to 32 percent, MSFT 22 percent), with AMZN slightly higher reflecting retail cyclicality. The April 30, 2026 dual earnings releases are the dominant near-term catalyst. Mean reversion has been reliable: 70 to 80 percent of large divergences resolve within 6 to 12 months.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Microsoft (MSFT) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Amazon (AMZN). Computed from 1,266 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Microsoft (MSFT) rises 0.21% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.27%. 127 qualifying events; Microsoft (MSFT) closed positive in 57% of them.
Following these triggers, Microsoft (MSFT) rises 0.66% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.27%. 127 qualifying events; Microsoft (MSFT) closed positive in 57% of them.
Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AMZN bigger than MSFT?+
No, MSFT is slightly larger. Microsoft traded near $415 with market capitalization $3.14 trillion. Amazon traded at $250.56 in mid-April 2026 with market capitalization $2.84 trillion. The MSFT/AMZN market cap ratio is 1.11x. The gap has narrowed from 1.40x in early 2024 as AMZN regained ground through AWS acceleration. The two are typically the third and fourth largest US public companies (NVIDIA $5.06T first, Apple $4.04T second, Alphabet $4.1T third) with the AMZN-MSFT ranking depending on the specific date.
How big is AWS vs Azure?+
AWS Q4 2025 revenue was $35.6 billion (annualized $142 billion, 32 percent cloud market share). Azure Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue was approximately $22 billion (annualized $90 billion, 25 percent market share). Combined the two represent 57 percent of cloud infrastructure spending. AWS has the larger absolute scale; Azure has been growing faster (39 percent constant currency in Q2 fiscal 2026 vs AWS 24 percent). The 15 percentage point growth gap has narrowed AWS's share lead from 8 percentage points in 2022 to 7 points in 2026.
Whose 2026 capex is bigger?+
Amazon by a substantial margin. AMZN committed approximately $200 billion in 2026 capex (largest single-year capex in US corporate history). MSFT committed $110 to $120 billion in fiscal 2026 (third-largest after AMZN and GOOGL's $175 to $185 billion). Combined AMZN + MSFT capex approaches $320 billion in 2026. The capex differential favors AMZN scale-up. Both companies are buying NVIDIA accelerators at scale and developing custom AI silicon (AMZN Trainium and Inferentia, MSFT Maia and Cobalt). The combined capex flowing largely to NVIDIA produces an estimated $80 to $120 billion of NVDA revenue in 2026 to 2027.
How are their AI partnerships different?+
Microsoft has $13 billion invested in OpenAI with 49 percent economic interest and exclusive Azure cloud rights through 2030. Amazon has $8 billion invested in Anthropic with AWS as primary cloud (less exclusive). OpenAI has approximately 600 to 700 million ChatGPT MAU; Anthropic has smaller user base but stronger enterprise positioning. OpenAI's consumer-product dominance gives MSFT visibility into broader AI adoption trends. Anthropic's enterprise focus produces deeper Fortune 500 relationships supporting AWS's enterprise AI workloads. Markets price MSFT-OpenAI at higher value but the gap has narrowed in 2025 to 2026.
How has AMZN outperformed MSFT?+
Significantly. From November 2022 through April 2026, AMZN gained approximately 195 percent versus MSFT 75 percent. The 120 percentage point AMZN outperformance reflects two factors: AMZN's post-2022 recovery from a deeper drawdown (AMZN was at $85 in November 2022 versus MSFT at $235), and AWS sustained growth supporting AMZN through cycles when MSFT faced capex-revenue concerns. The AMZN/MSFT market cap ratio expanded from 0.40 in November 2022 to 0.90 in April 2026, a 2.25x relative move. The peak was 1.05x in late 2024, trough 0.55x in mid-2024.
How is AMZN revenue composed differently?+
AMZN revenue is more diversified than MSFT despite both being mega-cap tech. AMZN Q4 2025: North America retail $115.6 billion (54 percent), International retail $43.4 billion (20 percent), AWS $35.6 billion (17 percent), Advertising $21.3 billion (10 percent). Retail exposure totals 74 percent. MSFT Q2 fiscal 2026: Microsoft Cloud $51.5 billion (63 percent), productivity software approximately $20 billion (25 percent), gaming approximately $5.5 billion (7 percent), other 5 percent. Cloud and software dominance produces more stable revenue trajectory and higher gross margins (70+ percent) compared to AMZN's blended 45 percent.
When do AMZN and MSFT report earnings?+
Both report on April 30, 2026 (same day). AMZN reports fiscal Q1 2026; MSFT reports Q3 fiscal 2026 (calendar Q1 2026 results). The simultaneous earnings will produce immediate cross-comparison points. Key items for AMZN Q1: revenue approximately $151 billion, AWS growth above 22 percent, capex update versus $200 billion 2026 guidance. Key items for MSFT Q3: revenue approximately $74 to $76 billion, Azure growth between 35 and 40 percent (consensus 38 percent), commercial RPO update (current $625 billion). The dual earnings will be the most consequential AMZN-vs-MSFT data point of 2026.
How do I trade AMZN vs MSFT?+
Track the AMZN/MSFT market cap ratio. April 2026 ratio is approximately 0.90x (range 0.80 to 1.00 through 2024 to 2026, peak 1.05x late 2024, trough 0.55x mid-2024). Long AMZN / short MSFT captures cloud market share recovery and retail-cycle exposure with hedged enterprise software risk; benefits from AWS growth above 25 percent, retail growth above 10 percent. Long MSFT / short AMZN captures Azure-OpenAI thesis with hedged retail risk; benefits from Azure growth above 40 percent, Copilot acceleration. AMZN volatility 28 to 32 percent (vs MSFT 22 percent). The April 30, 2026 dual earnings releases are the dominant catalyst. Mean reversion has been reliable: 70 to 80 percent of large divergences resolve within 6 to 12 months.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.