CONVEX

Fed Balance Sheet vs S&P 500

The Fed balance sheet (WALCL) has been the single most-cited liquidity input for US equities since 2008. WALCL peaked at $8.93 trillion in May 2022, ran off roughly $2.2 trillion through three years of quantitative tightening, and sat near $6.7 trillion in April 2026 after the FOMC announced the end of Treasury runoff effective December 1, 2025.

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·

Also known as: Fed Balance Sheet (Fed BS, balance sheet, QE, QT) · S&P 500 ETF (SPY) (ETF_SPY, S&P 500, SPX, SP500)

Liquidityweekly
Fed Balance Sheet
$6.73T
7D +0.00%30D +0.31%
Updated
Equity Indexdaily
S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
$738.99
7D +0.11%30D +4.06%
Updated

Why This Comparison Matters

The Fed balance sheet (WALCL) has been the single most-cited liquidity input for US equities since 2008. WALCL peaked at $8.93 trillion in May 2022, ran off roughly $2.2 trillion through three years of quantitative tightening, and sat near $6.7 trillion in April 2026 after the FOMC announced the end of Treasury runoff effective December 1, 2025. SPY closed at $708 on April 23, 2026, within 1 percent of its all-time high of $712. The headline correlation between WALCL and SPY is loose; net liquidity (WALCL minus TGA minus RRP) tracks SPY at roughly 0.85.

What WALCL Actually Measures

WALCL is the total assets line on the Federal Reserve's consolidated balance sheet, published every Thursday in the H.4.1 release as the prior Wednesday's level. The series aggregates Treasury holdings (about $4.2 trillion in April 2026), agency MBS (about $2.1 trillion), repurchase agreements, foreign currency swap lines, lending facilities including the Discount Window and the now-closed BTFP, and a smaller residual.

The series is mechanically simple to read but behaviorally complex. Treasury and MBS holdings change slowly through QE purchases or QT runoff. Repo, swap line, and lending facility balances can swing trillions in a single week during stress events. The week of March 19, 2023, the balance sheet expanded $297 billion as banks tapped the Discount Window and the freshly-launched BTFP after Silicon Valley Bank failed. None of that expansion was QE in the traditional sense, but it showed up in WALCL exactly the same way QE does.

From $0.9 Trillion to $8.9 Trillion: A Sixteen-Year Arc

Pre-Lehman, WALCL ran around $0.9 trillion, almost entirely Treasuries used for federal funds rate management. The sequence of expansions: QE1 (Nov 2008 to Mar 2010) lifted the balance sheet to $2.3 trillion. QE2 (Nov 2010 to Jun 2011) reached $2.9 trillion. QE3 (Sep 2012 to Oct 2014) reached $4.5 trillion, where it sat for three years.

QT1 (Oct 2017 to Aug 2019) trimmed the balance sheet from $4.5 trillion to about $3.7 trillion before the September 2019 repo crisis forced the Fed to resume Treasury bill purchases. By February 2020 WALCL was back near $4.2 trillion. The COVID QE that followed (March 2020 onward) doubled the balance sheet to its $8.93 trillion peak in May 2022. Each cycle is mechanically distinct, but the cumulative path is a sixteen-year ratchet upward.

The COVID QE Episode and the SPY Bottom

On March 15, 2020, the Fed cut the federal funds rate to zero and committed to buy at least $500 billion in Treasuries and $200 billion in agency MBS. On March 23 the FOMC removed the cap and announced unlimited purchases. SPY closed at $222.95 that day, having fallen 34 percent from its February 19 peak of $338.34 in 33 calendar days.

The Fed expanded its balance sheet by $1.6 trillion over the next three months, mostly Treasuries and MBS but including dollar swap line drawings that peaked near $450 billion. SPY rallied 50 percent from the March 23 close to the August 18, 2020 reclaim of pre-COVID highs. The episode is the cleanest single demonstration of liquidity-driven price recovery in modern US equity history. It also reinforced the assumption (which would be tested in 2022 to 2024) that the relationship runs in both directions.

The QT2 Cycle: 2022 to 2025

QT2 began June 2022 with caps of $30 billion Treasuries and $17.5 billion MBS per month, doubling to $60 billion and $35 billion in September 2022. The Fed lowered the Treasury cap to $25 billion in June 2024, then again to $5 billion in April 2025, while leaving the MBS cap at $35 billion. Cumulative runoff from May 2022 peak to April 2026 was approximately $2.2 trillion in WALCL terms.

The headline expectation that QT would crush SPY did not materialize. SPY fell 25 percent from January 2022 to October 2022, but most of that drawdown coincided with the policy rate path moving from zero to 4 percent rather than balance sheet runoff. From the October 2022 trough to April 2026, SPY roughly doubled while WALCL contracted by $1.7 trillion. The disconnect resolved through the parallel drain of the RRP facility, which offset most of QT2's mechanical drag.

Net Liquidity Versus Headline WALCL

Net liquidity, defined as WALCL minus the Treasury General Account minus the Overnight Reverse Repo facility balance, captures the share of central bank liquidity actually circulating in the banking system rather than parked at the Fed. The reverse repo facility peaked at $2.55 trillion in December 2022 and drained to roughly $200 billion by late 2025. That $2.35 trillion drain returned cash to money markets, Treasury bills, and ultimately bank reserves.

Net liquidity has held a rolling correlation with SPY of roughly 0.85 over post-2020 windows, well above the 0.4 to 0.6 range that headline WALCL produces against the same series. Money market funds parking cash in RRP versus deploying it into bills behaves differently from the Fed mechanically reducing reserves through runoff, and the spread captures the difference.

The 2018 Powell Autopilot Episode

On December 19, 2018, Chair Powell stated at the post-FOMC press conference that QT1 was running on "autopilot" and that the Fed had no plans to adjust the pace. SPY had already been weakening through Q4 2018 on China trade tensions, but the autopilot remark accelerated the selloff. From the September 20, 2018 peak of $293 to the December 24 trough of $234, SPY fell 19.8 percent in roughly three months.

Powell reversed the autopilot framing on January 4, 2019, signaling flexibility on both rates and the balance sheet. SPY rallied 13 percent in the next four weeks. QT1 ultimately ended in August 2019, ten months earlier than originally planned. The episode taught markets that balance sheet expectations, communicated through Fed forward guidance, often matter more for SPY than the spot level of WALCL itself.

The 2023 SVB Crisis and the BTFP

Silicon Valley Bank failed March 10, 2023; Signature Bank closed March 12; First Republic followed May 1. On March 12 the Fed launched the Bank Term Funding Program, lending against high-quality collateral at par regardless of market value. Banks tapped the BTFP for $300 billion in the first week and reached a peak balance of $168 billion outstanding in early 2024.

WALCL expanded from $8.39 trillion the week of March 8 to $8.73 trillion by March 22, a $339 billion increase in two weeks that reversed roughly six months of prior QT runoff. SPY troughed at $381 on March 13 and rallied 15 percent through May 1. The episode demonstrated that emergency liquidity facilities operate parallel to QT and can swamp it. The BTFP closed to new loans on March 11, 2024, and remaining loans rolled off through their one-year terms.

The End-of-QT Decision

Chair Powell signaled the QT endpoint in his October 14, 2025 NABE speech, noting that bank reserves were "somewhat above" the level the Fed considered consistent with ample reserve conditions. On October 29, 2025, the FOMC announced that Treasury runoff would cease effective December 1, 2025, while MBS runoff would continue at the $35 billion monthly cap with proceeds reinvested into Treasury bills.

Reserves stood at $2.89 trillion in November 2025 and were expected to drift toward $2.7 trillion as MBS runoff continues. The decision reflected lessons from September 2019, when reserves drained too far and short funding rates spiked above the IORB rate, forcing emergency repo intervention. By April 2026 WALCL had stabilized around $6.7 trillion, with the asset mix shifting slightly each month from MBS to Treasury bills rather than aggregate withdrawal.

What Drives the Spread Going Forward

With Treasury runoff paused and MBS runoff offset by Treasury bill reinvestment, WALCL is roughly flat to slowly declining through 2026. The mechanical liquidity tailwind that supported SPY from 2009 through 2021 is no longer operating in expansion mode. Forward expectations of the next QE cycle, rather than spot WALCL, drive the marginal SPY response to balance sheet news.

The RRP facility has limited room to drain further from $200 billion. The TGA, which the Treasury rebuilds after each debt ceiling resolution, is now the largest swing factor in net liquidity. Fed asset rotation between MBS and bills is a duration story rather than a liquidity story, but it modestly tightens spreads on agency MBS relative to Treasuries. SPY upside from this point depends on earnings rather than mechanical liquidity supply.

Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool

WALCL is released every Thursday at 4:30 p.m. ET as part of the H.4.1 statistical release, with data as of the prior Wednesday. SPY trades continuously. Practitioners overlay the weekly WALCL print with TGA balances (Treasury daily statement) and RRP balances (NY Fed daily release) to compute net liquidity as soon as the H.4.1 lands.

Practical failure modes of using raw WALCL versus SPY: the 2023 BTFP expansion looked like QE in WALCL terms but was emergency lending against existing collateral, not new money creation. The 2024 to 2025 RRP drain offset MBS runoff dollar-for-dollar without showing up in WALCL. The 2018 autopilot selloff and subsequent reversal happened with WALCL barely changing in either direction. The pair is a useful regime indicator on monthly horizons; on weekly horizons net liquidity is the cleaner read, and on intraday horizons the pair is mostly noise.

Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)

How S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Fed Balance Sheet. Computed from 257 aligned daily observations ending .

Up-shock
Fed Balance Sheet top-decile up-day (mean trigger +0.78%)
Mean 5D forward
+1.31%
Median 5D
+1.51%
Edge vs baseline
+0.14 pp
Hit rate (positive)
72%

Following these triggers, S&P 500 ETF (SPY) rises 1.31% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +1.17%. 25 qualifying events; S&P 500 ETF (SPY) closed positive in 72% of them.

n = 25 trigger events
Down-shock
Fed Balance Sheet bottom-decile down-day (mean trigger -0.63%)
Mean 5D forward
+2.71%
Median 5D
+3.26%
Edge vs baseline
+1.54 pp
Hit rate (positive)
77%

Following these triggers, S&P 500 ETF (SPY) rises 2.71% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +1.17%. 26 qualifying events; S&P 500 ETF (SPY) closed positive in 77% of them.

n = 26 trigger events

Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.

90-Day Statistics

Fed Balance Sheet
90D High
$6.73T
90D Low
$6.61T
90D Average
$6.67T
90D Change
+1.74%
13 data points
S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
90D High
$748.17
90D Low
$631.97
90D Average
$692.22
90D Change
+8.22%
76 data points

Explore Each Metric

Related Scenarios & Forecasts

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current Fed balance sheet size?+

WALCL stood at approximately $6.7 trillion in mid-April 2026, down from the May 2022 peak of $8.93 trillion. The balance sheet has been roughly stable since the FOMC announced on October 29, 2025 that Treasury runoff would end on December 1, 2025. MBS runoff continues at the $35 billion monthly cap, but maturing MBS proceeds are reinvested into Treasury bills, leaving total assets approximately flat. The series is published every Thursday at 4:30 p.m. ET in the Federal Reserve's H.4.1 release.

When did QT end and why?+

The FOMC ended Treasury runoff on December 1, 2025, after the October 29, 2025 meeting. Chair Powell signaled the decision on October 14, 2025, noting that bank reserves at $2.89 trillion were "somewhat above" the level the Fed considered consistent with ample reserve conditions. The Fed wanted to stop before reserves hit the same scarcity that triggered the September 2019 repo spike. MBS runoff continues at $35 billion per month, but proceeds are reinvested into Treasury bills, so the total balance sheet is roughly stable rather than shrinking.

How tight is the correlation between WALCL and SPY?+

The headline correlation between weekly WALCL and SPY runs at 0.4 to 0.6 over rolling three-year windows since 2010. Net liquidity, defined as WALCL minus the Treasury General Account minus the Overnight Reverse Repo facility, runs at approximately 0.85 against SPY. The headline series misses two big offsetting dynamics: TGA refills sterilize liquidity even when WALCL is flat, and RRP balances absorbed and then released roughly $2.4 trillion between 2022 and 2025. Most professional liquidity dashboards quote net liquidity rather than raw WALCL.

Did QT actually hurt the stock market?+

Not in the way many forecasters predicted. The QT2 cycle from June 2022 to December 2025 drained $2.2 trillion from WALCL. SPY fell 25 percent from January 2022 to October 2022, then doubled by April 2026. Most of the 2022 drawdown coincided with the federal funds rate moving from zero to 4 percent rather than runoff. The reverse repo facility drained $2.35 trillion over the same window, returning cash to money markets and bank reserves and offsetting most of QT2's mechanical drag. The episode showed that QT alone, in the presence of large RRP balances, is a much weaker SPY headwind than in 2018.

What is the difference between net liquidity and the Fed balance sheet?+

WALCL is total Fed assets. Net liquidity is WALCL minus the Treasury General Account (Treasury cash held at the Fed) minus the Overnight Reverse Repo balance (cash parked at the Fed by money market funds). Both subtractions remove cash that is not actively circulating in the banking system. Net liquidity rose dramatically through 2024 to 2025 as the RRP balance collapsed from $2.55 trillion at end of 2022 to roughly $200 billion by late 2025, even though WALCL itself was contracting. SPY tracked net liquidity, not WALCL, over that window.

Will the Fed start QE again in 2026?+

No QE is currently signaled. Chair Powell has been explicit that ending QT is a normalization step, not a pivot to expansion. The Fed could be forced into emergency liquidity (as in March 2023 with the BTFP) if a regional bank stress event recurs, or into Treasury bill purchases if reserve balances drop below the ample threshold (as in October 2019). Genuine QE, defined as outright purchases targeting longer-duration assets, would require a recession or a financial stability event. The April 2026 macro picture (positive GDP growth, 4.3 percent unemployment, inflation at 3 percent) does not support that scenario.

What did the 2023 banking crisis do to the balance sheet?+

WALCL expanded $339 billion in the two weeks after Silicon Valley Bank failed on March 10, 2023, as banks tapped the Discount Window and the newly-created Bank Term Funding Program. The BTFP peaked at $168 billion outstanding in early 2024. Most of the immediate March 2023 expansion reversed within weeks as Discount Window borrowing rolled off, but the BTFP balance persisted into 2024 since loans were one-year. The facility closed to new loans on March 11, 2024, and remaining BTFP loans rolled off by March 2025. SPY rallied 15 percent from the March 13, 2023 trough through May 1.

How does WALCL compare to the BoJ and ECB balance sheets?+

In April 2026 WALCL was approximately $6.7 trillion, the ECB Eurosystem balance sheet was approximately 6.0 trillion euros (roughly $6.6 trillion), and the Bank of Japan balance sheet was approximately 770 trillion yen (roughly $5.1 trillion). All three central banks have been in some form of unwind since 2022 to 2024. Global central bank liquidity, the sum of major DM balance sheets converted to USD, peaked at roughly $32 trillion in early 2022 and has contracted to roughly $26 trillion. SPY responds more to global liquidity than to US-specific liquidity over multi-year windows; the BoJ tightening cycle that began in 2024 is therefore part of the broader picture.

Related Comparisons

Explore Across Convex

Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.