CONVEX

High Yield (HYG) vs Long Treasury (TLT)

HYG (iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) tracks below-investment-grade US corporate debt with current yield approximately 7.5 percent (composed of 4.31 percent 10Y Treasury yield plus 2.84 percent HY OAS plus modest issue-specific premium). TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks long-duration Treasuries with yield 4.49 percent.

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·

Also known as: High Yield Credit (HYG) (ETF_HYG, junk bond ETF) · 20Y+ Treasury ETF (long bonds, treasury ETF)

Credit & Financial Stressdaily
High Yield Credit (HYG)
$79.46
7D -0.51%30D -1.48%
Updated
Bonds & Durationdaily
20Y+ Treasury ETF
$83.66
7D -1.56%30D -3.92%
Updated

Why This Comparison Matters

HYG (iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) tracks below-investment-grade US corporate debt with current yield approximately 7.5 percent (composed of 4.31 percent 10Y Treasury yield plus 2.84 percent HY OAS plus modest issue-specific premium). TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks long-duration Treasuries with yield 4.49 percent. The pair captures credit-cycle versus duration-cycle dynamics. HYG outperformance signals credit-cycle health, tightening spreads, and risk appetite. TLT outperformance signals recession fears, safe-haven demand, or aggressive Fed cuts compressing long yields. Turns in HYG/TLT ratio often precede similar turns in equity markets by 1-3 months, making the pair a leading indicator of broader risk regime changes.

The April 2026 Configuration

HYG yield ~7.5 percent (10Y 4.31% + HY OAS 2.84% + issue premium); TLT yield 4.49 percent. HY OAS 2.84 percent is tight, near long-run lower-quartile of 2.5-3.5 percent. Long-run HY OAS average is approximately 5.5 percent.

HYG/TLT ratio approximately 0.92 (HYG ~$80 / TLT $87 estimate based on typical pricing). The 12-month range is 0.85-1.0. The 5-year range is 0.70-1.05 (TLT relative peak in 2020 zero-rate era).

The combined reading: tight HY spreads + elevated long-end yields. This is consistent with late-cycle expansion: credit conditions benign (low default expectations) but long-end Treasury market under term premium pressure. The configuration favors HYG modestly: high coupon income with limited spread widening risk; TLT compressed by term premium expansion.

How HYG and TLT Diverge

HYG and TLT have distinct drivers despite both being bond ETFs. HYG is dominated by credit risk (default expectations, recession risk) plus interest rate risk (modest given shorter HYG duration ~3.5 years). TLT is dominated by interest rate risk (Fed policy, term premium, fiscal trajectory) with no credit risk (Treasury default risk effectively zero).

The practical implication: HYG and TLT diverge during specific macro regimes. Risk-on/credit-tightening regimes: HYG outperforms TLT (spreads compress, supports HYG; long yields stable or rise on growth). Risk-off/recession-imminent regimes: TLT outperforms HYG (long yields compress on Fed cuts; HY spreads widen on default expectations).

Correlation between HYG and TLT averages 0.30-0.45 in normal conditions. During stress correlation can flip negative as HYG falls (spread widening) while TLT rallies (safe-haven flight). The 2022 anomaly: both fell together as rate rises hurt TLT and credit spreads still widened modestly.

HYG-vs-TLT as Recession Predictor

HYG/TLT ratio is one of the cleanest recession predictors available in cross-asset relationships. Three historical examples.

2007 pre-recession: HYG/TLT ratio fell from 1.05 (early 2007) to 0.65 (March 2009 bottom), 38 percent ratio compression. The compression preceded NBER-dated recession December 2007 by approximately 9 months. HYG fell from $107 to $58 (-46 percent peak-to-trough), while TLT rallied from $90 to $123 (+37 percent).

2020 COVID: HYG/TLT ratio fell from 0.90 to 0.55 (March 2020 bottom), 39 percent compression in 6 weeks. Coincided with COVID lockdown shock; recession officially started February 2020. The pair compressed before equity bottom.

2018-2019 pre-pandemic concerns: HYG/TLT ratio compressed modestly before the 2020 COVID shock. Less clean signal due to lack of recession follow-through.

Current April 2026 ratio at 0.92 is in normal range (no recession signal). Compression below 0.85 would warrant monitoring; below 0.70 historically signals recession-imminent.

The 2024-2026 Era

HYG/TLT has been remarkably stable in 0.88-0.95 range through 2024-2026. The stability reflects competing dynamics: tight HY OAS supports HYG (no spread widening); elevated long-end term premium hurts TLT relative performance (long yields elevated despite Fed cuts).

The 2026 setup is unusual historically. Typically, late-cycle expansion produces HYG outperformance vs TLT. The 2024-2026 era has muted both legs through different mechanisms. Net result: range-bound HYG/TLT ratio.

Forward-looking through 2026: continued tight HY OAS supports HYG. Fed cuts compress long-end modestly but term premium expansion offsets. Expected: range-bound continuation absent recession trigger or fiscal credibility crisis.

How the Pair Performs in Stress

Stress history shows specific HYG-vs-TLT patterns. 2008-09 GFC: HYG fell 46 percent peak-to-trough; TLT rallied 37 percent peak-to-trough. Combined HYG/TLT ratio compression 60+ percent (ratio from 1.05 to 0.40 at extreme).

2020 COVID flash crash: HYG fell 22 percent in 3 weeks; TLT rallied 18 percent. Combined ratio compression 35 percent (ratio from 0.90 to 0.55).

2022 hiking cycle bear market: both fell together (anomalous). HYG fell 18 percent; TLT fell 50 percent peak-to-trough. Combined: HYG/TLT ratio actually expanded substantially as TLT fell more than HYG.

2023 banking crisis (March SVB): HYG fell 5 percent; TLT rallied 6 percent. Combined ratio compression 10 percent (typical mini-stress pattern).

2026 Iran war: HYG roughly flat; TLT modestly higher. Limited HYG/TLT response.

The pattern: HYG/TLT compresses during pure flight-to-safety + recession-anticipation episodes. The pair expands during inflation-driven stress (2022) where TLT falls more than HYG.

Volatility and Trading

HYG realized volatility approximately 8-12 percent annualized vs TLT 13-17 percent. The 0.6-0.8x ratio reflects HYG's lower duration (3.5 years vs TLT 17 years) plus credit-specific risks.

60-day rolling correlation between HYG and TLT averages 0.35-0.45 (modestly positive). During pure flight-to-safety correlation can flip negative (HYG falls, TLT rallies). During inflation-driven stress correlation rises to 0.60-0.70 (both fall on rate rises).

For pair-trade implementation, HYG exposure through HYG ETF (most liquid) or JNK (SPDR Bloomberg HY ETF). TLT exposure through TLT ETF or 30Y futures. Direct trading of HY credit through bank loans (BKLN ETF) or HY indexes (CDX HY) for derivatives expression.

The pair has produced cyclical returns. Long HYG / short TLT gained substantially during 2022 hiking (TLT compression). Long TLT / short HYG would have gained during 2008-09 GFC and 2020 COVID. 2024-2026 era: muted carry.

How HY Spreads and TLT Yields Move

Understanding the pair requires decomposing HYG and TLT yields. HYG yield = 10Y Treasury yield + HY OAS + issue-specific premium. TLT yield = long-end Treasury yield (10-30 year average duration weighted).

For HYG, two channels affect price: (1) 10Y Treasury yield direction; (2) HY OAS direction. 10Y yield down + OAS down = HYG strongly positive. 10Y yield up + OAS up = HYG strongly negative. The latter scenario is rare (recession with rates rising); the former is common during Fed cut + risk-on rotation.

For TLT, single channel: long-end yield direction. Long yields down = TLT positive. Long yields up = TLT negative. The relative simplicity makes TLT pure rate-direction expression.

The pair therefore captures credit cycle (HY OAS direction) plus relative duration positioning (HYG ~3.5y vs TLT 17y). Most actionable when HY OAS direction divergent from long-end yield direction.

Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool

For pair traders, HYG/TLT ratio currently ~0.92. The 12-month range is 0.85-1.00. The 5-year range is 0.55-1.05.

Long HYG / short TLT captures continued risk-on plus rate-rise scenarios: benefits from continued tight HY OAS, strong corporate earnings, Fed pause/hike (HYG less duration-sensitive than TLT), term premium expansion. Long TLT / short HYG captures recession + flight-to-safety: benefits from HY OAS widening, Fed aggressive cutting on recession trigger, term premium compression, credit stress emerging.

Position sizing: HYG 8-12 percent annualized vol vs TLT 13-17 percent (0.6-0.8x). Pair has produced cyclical returns: 2022 long HYG short TLT gained ~25 percentage points (TLT compression dominated); 2008-09 GFC long TLT short HYG gained 80+ percentage points.

Most actionable as recession indicator. HYG/TLT ratio compression below 0.85 warrants monitoring; below 0.70 historically signals recession-imminent.

How HYG-vs-TLT Compares to Equity Pairs

HYG/TLT serves similar function to gold/SPY or VIX-level as risk-regime indicator. Compared to other regime indicators.

Vs gold/SPY: gold-vs-SPY captures debasement narrative; HYG/TLT captures credit cycle. HYG/TLT is more recession-specific; gold-vs-SPY is more inflation/fiscal-specific.

Vs VIX: VIX captures equity volatility; HYG/TLT captures credit-vs-rate dynamics. VIX is shorter-horizon (30-day implied vol); HYG/TLT is longer-cycle (months to quarters).

Vs IWM/SPY: IWM/SPY captures small-cap-vs-mega-cap rotation; HYG/TLT captures credit-vs-rate rotation. Different regime tilts.

For comprehensive regime indicator dashboard, allocators watch all four (HYG/TLT, gold/SPY, VIX, IWM/SPY) plus T10Y3M and ISM PMI. The combination provides multi-dimensional regime read. April 2026 reading: HYG/TLT 0.92 (normal), gold/SPY 6.67 (debasement-tilt), VIX 18.76 (mid-stress), IWM/SPY 2.88 (small-cap-favoring), T10Y3M 63bps (no recession signal).

The April 2026 Configuration

HYG yield ~7.5% (10Y 4.31% + OAS 2.84% + premium); TLT yield 4.49%. HY OAS 2.84% (tight, near long-run lower-quartile 2.5-3.5%; long-run avg 5.5%). HYG/TLT ratio ~0.92 (12-month range 0.85-1.0; 5-year range 0.55-1.05). Range-bound through 2024-2026 reflecting tight HY OAS supporting HYG vs elevated term premium hurting TLT.

Forward-looking: continued tight HY OAS supports HYG. Fed cuts compress long-end modestly but term premium expansion offsets TLT benefit. Expected range-bound continuation 0.88-0.95 absent recession trigger.

Watch the ratio for moves outside 0.85-0.95 range. Below 0.85 indicates HYG underperformance emerging (typically recession-warning combined with credit stress). Above 0.95 indicates HYG extreme outperformance (typically tight credit + Fed cut + risk-on rally combination). The pair offers leading-indicator characteristics for broader risk regime changes.

Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)

How 20Y+ Treasury ETF has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in High Yield Credit (HYG). Computed from 1,266 aligned daily observations ending .

Up-shock
High Yield Credit (HYG) top-decile up-day (mean trigger +0.86%)
Mean 5D forward
-0.19%
Median 5D
-0.24%
Edge vs baseline
-0.01 pp
Hit rate (positive)
45%

Following these triggers, 20Y+ Treasury ETF falls 0.19% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of -0.18%. 127 qualifying events; 20Y+ Treasury ETF closed positive in 45% of them.

n = 127 trigger events
Down-shock
High Yield Credit (HYG) bottom-decile down-day (mean trigger -0.89%)
Mean 5D forward
-0.58%
Median 5D
-0.63%
Edge vs baseline
-0.40 pp
Hit rate (positive)
41%

Following these triggers, 20Y+ Treasury ETF falls 0.58% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of -0.18%. 127 qualifying events; 20Y+ Treasury ETF closed positive in 41% of them.

n = 127 trigger events

Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.

90-Day Statistics

High Yield Credit (HYG)
90D High
$81
90D Low
$78.72
90D Average
$80
90D Change
-1.67%
76 data points
20Y+ Treasury ETF
90D High
$90.82
90D Low
$83.66
90D Average
$86.89
90D Change
-6.91%
76 data points

Explore Each Metric

Related Scenarios & Forecasts

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are HYG and TLT?+

HYG (iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) tracks below-investment-grade US corporate debt with current yield ~7.5% (10Y 4.31% + HY OAS 2.84% + issue premium). TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks long-duration Treasuries with yield 4.49%. HYG/TLT ratio ~0.92 (12-month range 0.85-1.0; 5-year range 0.55-1.05). HYG dominated by credit risk + modest interest rate risk (duration ~3.5 years); TLT dominated by interest rate risk + zero credit risk. HY OAS 2.84% tight, near long-run lower-quartile 2.5-3.5%; long-run avg 5.5%.

How do HYG and TLT diverge?+

Distinct drivers despite both being bond ETFs. Risk-on/credit-tightening regimes: HYG outperforms (spreads compress; long yields stable/rise on growth). Risk-off/recession-imminent regimes: TLT outperforms (long yields compress on Fed cuts; HY spreads widen on default expectations). Correlation 0.30-0.45 normal conditions. During stress correlation can flip negative as HYG falls (spread widening) while TLT rallies (safe-haven). 2022 anomaly: both fell together as rate rises hurt TLT and credit spreads still widened modestly. HYG duration ~3.5 years vs TLT 17 years explains relative duration sensitivity.

How is HYG-vs-TLT a recession predictor?+

Three historical examples. 2007 pre-recession: HYG/TLT ratio fell from 1.05 (early 2007) to 0.65 (March 2009), 38% compression. Compression preceded NBER recession December 2007 by ~9 months. HYG -46% peak-to-trough; TLT +37%. 2020 COVID: ratio fell from 0.90 to 0.55, 39% compression in 6 weeks. Coincided with COVID lockdown shock. 2018-2019 pre-pandemic: ratio compressed modestly before COVID shock. Current April 2026 ratio 0.92 in normal range. Compression below 0.85 warrants monitoring; below 0.70 historically signals recession-imminent.

How does the pair perform in stress?+

2008-09 GFC: HYG -46% peak-to-trough; TLT +37%. Combined ratio compression 60+%. 2020 COVID flash crash: HYG -22% in 3 weeks; TLT +18%. Combined ratio compression 35%. 2022 hiking cycle: both fell together (anomalous) - HYG -18%, TLT -50%. Combined ratio actually expanded as TLT fell more. 2023 banking crisis (March SVB): HYG -5%; TLT +6%. Combined ratio compression 10%. 2026 Iran war: HYG flat; TLT modestly higher; limited response. Pattern: HYG/TLT compresses during pure flight-to-safety + recession-anticipation. Expands during inflation-driven stress (2022) where TLT falls more.

How volatile is the pair?+

HYG realized volatility ~8-12% annualized vs TLT 13-17% (0.6-0.8x ratio reflects HYG lower duration plus credit-specific risks). 60-day rolling correlation 0.35-0.45 modestly positive. During pure flight-to-safety can flip negative (HYG falls, TLT rallies). During inflation-driven stress rises to 0.60-0.70 (both fall on rate rises). HYG exposure: HYG ETF (most liquid) or JNK (SPDR Bloomberg HY). TLT exposure: TLT ETF or 30Y futures. Pair has produced cyclical returns: 2022 long HYG short TLT +25pp; 2008-09 long TLT short HYG +80pp.

How do HY spreads and TLT yields move?+

HYG yield = 10Y Treasury yield + HY OAS + issue-specific premium. TLT yield = long-end Treasury yield. HYG affected by two channels: 10Y direction + HY OAS direction. 10Y down + OAS down = HYG strongly positive. 10Y up + OAS up = HYG strongly negative. TLT single channel: long-end yield direction. Long yields down = TLT positive. The pair captures credit cycle (HY OAS direction) plus relative duration positioning. Most actionable when HY OAS direction divergent from long-end yield direction.

How does the pair compare to other regime indicators?+

Vs gold/SPY: gold-vs-SPY captures debasement narrative; HYG/TLT captures credit cycle. HYG/TLT is more recession-specific; gold-vs-SPY is more inflation/fiscal-specific. Vs VIX: VIX captures equity volatility; HYG/TLT captures credit-vs-rate dynamics. VIX shorter-horizon (30-day implied vol); HYG/TLT longer-cycle (months to quarters). Vs IWM/SPY: small-cap-vs-mega-cap vs credit-vs-rate. April 2026 reading combination: HYG/TLT 0.92 (normal), gold/SPY 6.67 (debasement-tilt), VIX 18.76 (mid-stress), IWM/SPY 2.88 (small-cap-favoring), T10Y3M 63bps (no recession signal).

How do I trade HYG vs TLT?+

HYG/TLT ratio currently ~0.92 (12-month range 0.85-1.0; 5-year range 0.55-1.05). Long HYG / short TLT captures risk-on plus rate-rise: benefits from continued tight HY OAS, strong earnings, Fed pause/hike, term premium expansion. Long TLT / short HYG captures recession + flight-to-safety: benefits from HY OAS widening, Fed aggressive cutting, term premium compression, credit stress. Position sizing: HYG 8-12% annualized vol vs TLT 13-17% (0.6-0.8x). Most actionable as recession indicator. HYG/TLT ratio compression below 0.85 warrants monitoring; below 0.70 historically signals recession-imminent.

Related Comparisons

Explore Across Convex

Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.