CONVEX

Unemployment Rate vs S&P 500

The U.S. Unemployment Rate (UNRATE on FRED, U-3 from BLS Current Population Survey) rose from a cycle low of 3.4% in January and April 2023 to 4.3% in July 2024, a 90bp increase that triggered the Sahm Rule.

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·

Also known as: Unemployment Rate (U3) (unemployment, U3, jobless rate) · S&P 500 ETF (SPY) (ETF_SPY, S&P 500, SPX, SP500)

Labor Marketmonthly
Unemployment Rate (U3)
4.30%
7D +0.00%30D +0.00%
Updated
Equity Indexdaily
S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
$738.99
7D +0.11%30D +4.06%
Updated

Why This Comparison Matters

The U.S. Unemployment Rate (UNRATE on FRED, U-3 from BLS Current Population Survey) rose from a cycle low of 3.4% in January and April 2023 to 4.3% in July 2024, a 90bp increase that triggered the Sahm Rule. SPY returned +24.0% in calendar 2024 against that backdrop, the cleanest historical example of equities ignoring a labor-market warning. The Sahm Rule, named after economist Claudia Sahm, fires when the 3-month moving average of U-3 rises 0.50 percentage points or more above its trailing 12-month minimum. It triggered every U.S. recession since 1950, with the 2024 trigger being the open exception that has not yet produced a recession.

What UNRATE actually measures and how SPY relates

UNRATE is the seasonally adjusted U-3 unemployment rate from the BLS Current Population Survey, published the first Friday of each month at 8:30am ET as part of the Employment Situation report. The household survey samples roughly 60,000 households, classifying each working-age adult as employed, unemployed, or not in the labor force. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) tracks the cap-weighted S&P 500, the benchmark for U.S. large-cap equity claims on the underlying economy.

The two are connected through the corporate-profits-share-of-GDP channel and through Fed policy reaction. Rising unemployment historically signals slower wage growth, which compresses input costs and can preserve margins; it also signals slower aggregate demand, which compresses revenue. The net effect on S&P 500 earnings depends on which channel dominates. Federal Reserve research (Gertler and Karadi 2015, working paper series) documents that the Fed's response function shifts when U-3 rises through the natural rate, and rate cuts then become a tailwind for SPY multiples. The Sahm Rule is the formal trigger that captures this transition.

The 2024 Sahm Rule trigger and the equity decoupling

U-3 rose from 3.4% in January 2023 to 4.3% in July 2024. The Sahm Rule three-month-moving-average minus trailing-12-month-minimum measure crossed +0.53 percentage points in July 2024, triggering the recession indicator. In all 11 recessions since 1950, the Sahm Rule fired during the recession with a median lead of three months before NBER's official declaration. The 2024 trigger has now been outstanding for over 21 months without a recession declaration, the longest open trigger in the rule's history.

SPY ignored the trigger entirely. SPY closed July 31, 2024 at 549.84 and ended 2024 at 588.22 for a +24.0% calendar-year total return. The decoupling reflects three structural factors. First, the AI capex cycle drove S&P 500 earnings upward independent of broad labor-market conditions: Magnificent 7 companies represented roughly 32% of SPY weight in 2024 and contributed disproportionately to earnings growth. Second, Fed easing began September 2024 (50bp cut at the September 18 FOMC, two additional cuts to year-end totaling 100bp from the 5.25 to 5.50% peak), which supported multiple expansion. Third, U-3 remained low in absolute terms (4.3% versus the post-2009 trough of 3.4% but well below the historical natural-rate estimate of 5.0 to 5.5%).

Historical relationship across recessions

The 2008 to 2009 episode is the clearest. U-3 rose from 5.0% in December 2007 to 10.0% in October 2009, a 500bp climb. SPY fell from a peak of 156.93 on October 9, 2007 to a trough of 67.10 on March 9, 2009, a -57.3% drawdown. SPY bottomed roughly seven months before U-3 peaked, the standard relationship in which equity markets price the recovery before the labor-market damage fully materializes.

The 2020 COVID episode compressed the same dynamic into weeks. U-3 rose from 3.5% in February 2020 to 14.7% in April 2020, an 1,120bp surge as 22 million payroll jobs were lost. SPY fell from 339.08 on February 19, 2020 to 218.26 on March 23, 2020, a -34.1% drawdown over 33 days. Federal Reserve emergency action ($1.6 trillion of Treasury purchases over three weeks plus the CARES Act fiscal impulse of $2.2 trillion) drove SPY to recover its pre-crisis level by mid-August 2020 while U-3 was still at 8.4%. The 2001 dot-com episode is the longest historical decoupling: SPY peaked September 2000, U-3 troughed at 3.9% in December 2000 and rose to 6.3% by June 2003, with SPY drawdown peaking at -49% in October 2002.

How CRAI conditions the UNRATE-SPY divergence read

Convex Risk Appetite Index (CRAI), built from VIX, ICE BofA HY OAS, and equity put-call ratios, is the cleanest cross-check on whether SPY is correctly ignoring an UNRATE rise or whether the labor-market signal will eventually pull equities lower. In 2007, SPY peaked October 9 with CRAI in its top quartile, but CRAI began deteriorating in November 2007 well before SPY broke down in early 2008. The CRAI-conditioned read of the UNRATE-SPY pair would have flagged the 2008 setup three to four months earlier than the SPY price action alone.

The 2024 Sahm Rule trigger had a different CRAI signature. CRAI remained in its upper half throughout the July 2024 to year-end window, consistent with SPY's continued advance. There was no CRAI deterioration to confirm the labor-market signal. That joint reading (UNRATE rising, SPY rising, CRAI stable) is what made 2024 unprecedented in the post-1990 history. The April 2026 reading shows U-3 hovering in the mid-4% range, SPY near all-time highs, and CRAI in the upper-half. The pair continues to disagree, with CRAI siding with SPY rather than UNRATE.

What the Sahm Rule's creator says about the 2024 trigger

Claudia Sahm, the economist who created the rule while at the Federal Reserve Board (Sahm 2019, Brookings paper), publicly stated in August 2024 and again in 2025 that the 2024 trigger was likely a false positive. Her reasoning, summarized in Fortune and Bloomberg interviews and in her own Substack posts, focuses on three factors: labor force participation rose from 62.4% in early 2023 to 62.7% in mid-2024 as immigration and prime-age participation increased, which mechanically raises U-3 without requiring layoffs; payroll growth remained positive throughout the trigger window (averaging 144,000 per month over the trailing 12 months as of July 2024); and the rise in U-3 was driven more by labor supply expansion than by job destruction.

The Federal Reserve has implicitly endorsed Sahm's interpretation through its policy actions: the FOMC began cutting rates in September 2024 not because recession was imminent but because real rates were too restrictive given decelerating inflation. The 100bp of cuts through end-2024 and additional cuts through 2025 brought Fed Funds toward the 3.50 to 3.75% range by April 2026. SPY responded to the policy easing rather than to the Sahm trigger, which is consistent with the labor-supply-driven interpretation.

Practical takeaway and the April 2026 configuration

The pair currently sits in the most decoupled state in its post-1990 history. UNRATE around mid-4%, SPY near all-time highs, Sahm Rule trigger outstanding for 21 months. The two resolution paths historically have been: SPY drawdown that reconciles with the labor-market signal (1973, 1990, 2001, 2007), or UNRATE reversal that vindicates the equity market (1995 to 1996, 2003, possibly 2024 to 2026). The April 2026 configuration is closest to the 1995 to 1996 mid-cycle correction analog: Greenspan paused the 1994 hiking cycle, U-3 stabilized at 5.5%, SPY went on to triple over the following five years.

The trade structure for the divergence is asymmetric. SPY has limited upside from current valuations (Buffett Indicator at 226 to 230% of GDP per Wilshire data, the highest reading on record) and material downside if the Sahm trigger reasserts. The cleanest expression is to maintain core SPY exposure while adding tail hedges: SPY puts at 90% of spot strike, VIX call spreads, and gold (GLD) as a regime-change hedge. Position sizing should account for the unprecedented duration of the Sahm trigger; the longer it persists, the larger the eventual reconciliation if recession materializes.

90-Day Statistics

Unemployment Rate (U3)
90D High
4.30%
90D Low
4.30%
90D Average
4.30%
90D Change
+0.00%
2 data points
S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
90D High
$748.17
90D Low
$631.97
90D Average
$692.22
90D Change
+8.22%
76 data points

Explore Each Metric

Related Scenarios & Forecasts

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Sahm Rule and when did it trigger?+

The Sahm Rule fires when the 3-month moving average of the U-3 unemployment rate rises 0.50 percentage points or more above its trailing 12-month minimum. Created by economist Claudia Sahm during her tenure at the Federal Reserve Board (Sahm 2019, Brookings), the rule has triggered during every recession since 1950 with a median three-month lead before NBER's official declaration. The 2024 trigger fired in July 2024 when the measure crossed +0.53 percentage points, with U-3 having risen from 3.4% in early 2023 to 4.3% in July 2024. The trigger has now been outstanding for over 21 months without a recession, the longest open trigger in the rule's history.

Why didn't the 2024 Sahm trigger produce a recession?+

Three factors. First, the U-3 rise was driven more by labor supply expansion than by job destruction: labor force participation rose from 62.4% in early 2023 to 62.7% in mid-2024 as immigration and prime-age participation increased. Second, payroll growth remained positive throughout the trigger window, averaging 144,000 per month over the trailing 12 months as of July 2024. Third, the Fed began cutting in September 2024 (50bp cut at the September 18 FOMC, 100bp total through year-end), removing real-rate restriction before recession could materialize. Sahm herself publicly stated the 2024 trigger was likely a false positive driven by labor supply rather than labor demand.

How did SPY behave during the 2024 Sahm trigger window?+

SPY closed July 31, 2024 at 549.84 and ended calendar 2024 at 588.22 for a +24.0% calendar-year total return. SPY ignored the Sahm trigger entirely, driven by AI capex cycle earnings growth (Magnificent 7 represented roughly 32% of SPY weight and contributed disproportionately to earnings growth), Fed easing in the second half of 2024, and the absolute level of U-3 staying below the natural-rate estimate of 5.0 to 5.5%.

What did SPY do during the 2008 unemployment surge?+

U-3 rose from 5.0% in December 2007 to 10.0% in October 2009, a 500bp climb. SPY fell from a peak of 156.93 on October 9, 2007 to a trough of 67.10 on March 9, 2009, a -57.3% drawdown. SPY bottomed roughly seven months before U-3 peaked, the standard relationship in which equity markets price the recovery before the labor-market damage fully materializes. The 2008 to 2009 episode is the clearest historical example of UNRATE and SPY moving in their textbook directions, reconciling around the recession trough.

Which Convex composite is most relevant for UNRATE versus SPY?+

Convex Risk Appetite Index (CRAI), built from VIX, ICE BofA HY OAS, and equity put-call ratios, is the cleanest cross-check on whether SPY is correctly ignoring an UNRATE rise. In 2007, CRAI began deteriorating in November well before SPY broke down in early 2008, providing a three-to-four-month lead. The 2024 trigger had no analogous CRAI deterioration: CRAI stayed in its upper half through year-end 2024 and into 2025, consistent with SPY's continued advance. The current April 2026 reading shows CRAI siding with SPY rather than UNRATE.

How long can the Sahm trigger stay open before recession?+

Historically, the rule fires during the recession itself with a median three-month lead before NBER declares the recession. The maximum lag in the post-1950 record before 2024 was nine months. The 2024 trigger has now been open for over 21 months without recession, the longest open trigger in the rule's history. The 1966 episode is the only other historical instance where U-3 rose 50bp from cycle low without a recession following inside 12 months, and that episode was followed by a 1969 to 1970 recession with a 36-month lag.

What is the trade structure for the UNRATE-SPY divergence?+

The April 2026 configuration is closest to the 1995 to 1996 mid-cycle correction analog: Fed paused tightening, U-3 stabilized, SPY went on to triple over the following five years. The bearish analog is 2007: SPY peaked while U-3 was beginning its rise, and the eventual reconciliation came through SPY drawdown of 57%. The asymmetric trade is to maintain core SPY exposure while adding tail hedges: SPY puts at 90% of spot, VIX call spreads, and gold (GLD) as a regime-change hedge. Position sizing accounts for the unprecedented duration of the open Sahm trigger.

Related Comparisons

Explore Across Convex

Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.