Healthcare (XLV) vs Industrials (XLI)
XLV closed at $147.77 and XLI at $171.18 on April 15, 2026, putting the XLV/XLI ratio at approximately 0.863. Both ETFs charge a 0.09 percent expense ratio.
Also known as: Healthcare (XLV) (ETF_XLV, healthcare) · Industrials (XLI) (ETF_XLI, industrials)
Why This Comparison Matters
XLV closed at $147.77 and XLI at $171.18 on April 15, 2026, putting the XLV/XLI ratio at approximately 0.863. Both ETFs charge a 0.09 percent expense ratio. XLV holds 62 stocks led by Eli Lilly at 13.80 percent, Johnson and Johnson at 10.55 percent, AbbVie at 6.74 percent, UnitedHealth at 6.10 percent, and Merck at 5.40 percent. XLI holds 82 stocks led by Caterpillar at 7.06 percent, GE Vernova at 5.70 percent, GE Aerospace at 5.43 percent, RTX at 4.55 percent, and Boeing at 3.41 percent. XLI assets total approximately $30.5 billion. Healthcare is roughly 12 percent of the S&P 500; industrials roughly 8 percent. The pair is the single cleanest defensive-versus-cyclical sector ratio in US equities.
Why XLV/XLI Is the Late-Cycle Tell
Healthcare earnings come from drug volumes, hospital utilization, and managed-care premiums, which are largely inelastic to GDP. Industrial earnings come from aerospace orderbooks, freight volumes, mining and construction equipment cycles, and electrical infrastructure capex, all of which compress when growth slows. Historically the XLV/XLI ratio rises in the six to twelve months before US recessions and falls during the two-year recoveries that follow.
The April 2026 ratio of 0.863 sits inside its three-year range. The ratio bottomed near 0.79 in late 2024 (industrials leading on AI infrastructure capex) and peaked near 0.95 in mid-2022 during the recession scare. A move above 0.92 would indicate defensive rotation has arrived; a sustained move below 0.82 would indicate the cyclical phase is extending.
XLV Composition in 2026
The 62 holdings in XLV concentrate heavily at the top. Eli Lilly at 13.80 percent reflects the GLP-1 obesity-drug franchise (Mounjaro and Zepbound) generating $40-plus billion in revenue and growing 50 percent year over year. Johnson and Johnson at 10.55 percent provides the diversified pharma-plus-medtech anchor after the Kenvue consumer-health spinoff. AbbVie at 6.74 percent reflects the post-Humira portfolio with Skyrizi and Rinvoq carrying volume growth. UnitedHealth at 6.10 percent and Merck at 5.40 percent round out the top five.
The top five represent approximately 42 percent of XLV. That concentration matters because Lilly alone now drives more daily XLV variance than any other single name. When Lilly disappoints on quarterly script trends or pipeline data, XLV falls hard despite the broader sector being stable.
XLI Composition in 2026
XLI holds 82 stocks across aerospace and defense, machinery, transports, and electrical equipment. Caterpillar at 7.06 percent reflects mining and construction equipment exposure. The two GE successor companies combined sit at 11.13 percent (GE Vernova at 5.70 percent on grid and gas turbine demand, GE Aerospace at 5.43 percent on commercial-engine aftermarket). RTX at 4.55 percent and Boeing at 3.41 percent provide commercial-aerospace and defense leverage.
The top five represent approximately 26 percent of XLI, less concentrated than XLV. The breadth means XLI tracks underlying cyclical conditions more reliably than any single subsector. Aerospace orderbooks alone (Boeing plus Airbus combined backlog above 14,000 aircraft, eight to ten years at current build rates) provide multi-year visibility that smooths XLI earnings even during macro slowdowns.
The 2024-2026 Industrial Capex Cycle
XLI has benefited from a broad industrial capex cycle that began around 2023 and accelerated through 2025. Three drivers stand out. First, AI data center buildouts: hyperscaler capex from Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Amazon combined exceeded $400 billion in 2025, with grid equipment, cooling systems, and electrical infrastructure flowing to GE Vernova, Eaton, Quanta, and Trane. Second, defense spending: the Iran war that began February 2026 has accelerated US and allied defense procurement, lifting RTX, Lockheed, Northrop, and General Dynamics. Third, reshoring: CHIPS Act fab construction (TSMC Arizona, Intel Ohio, Samsung Texas) and IRA-driven manufacturing has supported industrial-equipment demand.
The combined effect: XLI gained approximately 22 percent in 2024 and another 15 percent in 2025, outpacing XLV by roughly 12 percentage points cumulatively. The late-2024 trough in XLV/XLI near 0.79 captured the peak relative cyclical strength.
Why XLV Has Lagged 2024-2025
Healthcare underperformance has specific structural causes. UnitedHealth lost roughly 30 percent peak-to-trough during 2024-2025 on Medicare Advantage margin compression, the Change Healthcare cyber incident, and DOJ antitrust investigation. The drag pulled XLV by roughly 2 percentage points given the 6 percent UNH weight. CVS, Humana, and Cigna in adjacent managed-care exposure added similar drag.
Drug-pricing politics added pressure. The IRA Medicare drug price negotiations published their second tranche of 15 negotiated drugs in February 2025, with prices effective January 2026. The list included blockbuster names representing roughly $50 billion in annual revenue. Pharma multiples compressed roughly 2 to 3 turns of forward earnings on the ongoing political risk. The Lilly-led GLP-1 strength has masked but not offset these headwinds at the index level.
How the Ratio Moves Across Macro Regimes
XLV/XLI tracks macro regime identifiably. In risk-on cyclical recoveries (2009-2010, 2016-2017, 2020-2021, 2023-2024), XLI leads and the ratio falls. In late-cycle and recession-anticipation phases (2007 H2, 2018 H2, 2022 H1), XLV leads and the ratio rises. In the recession itself, both fall but XLV typically falls less, so the ratio rises further. In the recovery phase, XLI snaps back faster.
The regime-diagnostic value comes from the ratio anticipating what survey data confirms later. ISM Manufacturing PMI, durable goods orders, and capex announcements typically follow the XLV/XLI ratio by two to four months. When the ratio breaks above its 200-day moving average from below, ISM PMI typically rolls over within one quarter.
Rate Sensitivity Comparison
Both sectors have rate exposure but through different channels. XLV is moderately rate-sensitive: pharma dividends compete with Treasury yields, and pharma R and D economics depend on cost of capital. The dividend-yield spread to the 10-year Treasury at 4.20 percent is modest in April 2026 because pharma yields run 1.5 to 3 percent. Healthcare PE multiples expanded modestly during the 2024 Fed easing cycle (100 basis points of cuts September through December 2024) but less than utilities or REITs.
XLI is more cyclically rate-sensitive: industrial capex buyers borrow heavily, and rate cuts directly stimulate equipment-financing demand. Construction equipment, trucking fleets, and aerospace financing all respond to rates within two to four quarters. The 2024 cuts contributed materially to the late-2024 XLI rally that pushed XLV/XLI to its 0.79 low.
The Iran War Impact on Both Sectors
The February 2026 Iran war has produced asymmetric effects on the pair. XLI has gained from defense procurement: RTX, Lockheed, Northrop combined are roughly 9 percent of XLI, and these names rose 15 to 25 percent year-to-date 2026 on accelerated US and allied munitions and missile-defense orders. XLV has been roughly flat: defensive sectors typically benefit during geopolitical risk, but the GLP-1 pricing pressure and drug-pricing political risk have offset the safety bid.
Net result: the XLV/XLI ratio has stayed in the 0.84 to 0.88 range through April 2026 rather than rising decisively to a defensive regime. The market is reading the Iran war as an industrial-demand event (defense capex up) rather than a recession-imminent event (defensives outperforming).
How to Read the Pair as a Trading Tool
Track three things. First, the 200-day moving average of the XLV/XLI ratio. Currently approximately 0.85. Cross above with rising slope is the late-cycle rotation signal. Second, ISM Manufacturing PMI direction. ISM rolling below 50 with XLV/XLI rising confirms the rotation. Third, Lilly individual performance. Because Lilly is 13.80 percent of XLV, idiosyncratic Lilly moves can drive the ratio without genuine sector rotation. Filter for ratio moves that hold even when ex-Lilly XLV moves are flat.
For pair traders, long XLV / short XLI captures defensive positioning with hedged broad market beta. The trade benefits from ISM rolling below 50, defense-spending peak, and AI capex deceleration. Short XLV / long XLI benefits from continued cyclical strength, ongoing AI capex, and drug-pricing political pressure. Position sizing should account for XLV approximately 16 percent annualized volatility versus XLI approximately 19 percent.
The April 2026 Configuration
XLV/XLI at 0.863 sits roughly in the middle of its three-year range. Healthcare faces the IRA drug-price negotiation deadlines (next 15 drugs effective January 2027), ongoing Lilly-driven concentration risk, and managed-care DOJ overhang. Industrials face the AI capex peak question (whether 2026-2027 sustains the pace), the Iran war duration, and the durable-goods order trajectory through Q2 and Q3 2026.
Forward-looking: if Iran resolves and AI capex sustains, expect ratio to drift toward 0.84-0.85 (cyclical extending). If recession concerns reignite (ISM rolling, layoffs accelerating), expect ratio to push toward 0.88-0.92 (defensive rotation). The Q1 2026 GDP print, April-May ISM trajectory, and Lilly Q1 earnings on April 30 are the immediate catalysts that will determine which regime dominates the next two quarters.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Industrials (XLI) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Healthcare (XLV). Computed from 1,266 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Industrials (XLI) rises 0.06% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.23%. 127 qualifying events; Industrials (XLI) closed positive in 51% of them.
Following these triggers, Industrials (XLI) rises 0.18% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.23%. 127 qualifying events; Industrials (XLI) closed positive in 55% of them.
Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are XLV and XLI prices in April 2026?+
XLV (Health Care Select Sector SPDR) closed at $147.77 on April 15, 2026, and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR) closed at $171.18, putting the XLV/XLI ratio at approximately 0.863. Both ETFs charge a 0.09 percent expense ratio, the lowest tier among sector ETFs. Healthcare represents approximately 12 percent of the S&P 500; industrials approximately 8 percent. The current ratio sits in the middle of its three-year range, with the late-2024 low near 0.79 (industrials leading on AI capex) and the mid-2022 high near 0.95 (recession scare driving defensive rotation).
What's in XLV?+
XLV holds 62 stocks. April 2026 top holdings: Eli Lilly 13.80 percent, Johnson and Johnson 10.55 percent, AbbVie 6.74 percent, UnitedHealth 6.10 percent, Merck 5.40 percent. The top 5 represent approximately 42 percent of assets. Lilly's weight reflects the GLP-1 obesity-drug franchise (Mounjaro and Zepbound generating $40-plus billion in revenue, growing 50 percent year-over-year). The high concentration means Lilly alone drives more daily XLV variance than any other name. AUM approximately $36 billion, expense ratio 0.09 percent.
What's in XLI?+
XLI holds 82 stocks across aerospace and defense, machinery, transports, and electrical equipment. April 2026 top holdings: Caterpillar 7.06 percent, GE Vernova 5.70 percent, GE Aerospace 5.43 percent, RTX 4.55 percent, Boeing 3.41 percent. Top 5 represent approximately 26 percent of assets, less concentrated than XLV. The two GE successor companies combined sit at 11.13 percent. AUM approximately $30.5 billion. Aerospace orderbooks (Boeing plus Airbus combined backlog above 14,000 aircraft, eight to ten years at current build rates) provide multi-year visibility.
Why has XLI outperformed XLV in 2024-2025?+
Three drivers. First, AI data center buildouts: hyperscaler capex combined exceeded $400 billion in 2025, flowing to GE Vernova, Eaton, Quanta for grid and electrical infrastructure. Second, defense spending acceleration following Russia-Ukraine and now the February 2026 Iran war, lifting RTX, Lockheed, Northrop. Third, reshoring driven by CHIPS Act and IRA. Combined: XLI gained approximately 22 percent in 2024 and 15 percent in 2025, outpacing XLV by roughly 12 percentage points. Healthcare lagged due to UnitedHealth-led managed care drag and IRA drug-price negotiation overhang.
What does an XLV/XLI ratio increase typically signal?+
A rising XLV/XLI ratio is one of the cleanest late-cycle signals in US equities. Historically the ratio rises in the six to twelve months before US recessions and falls during the two-year recoveries that follow. ISM Manufacturing PMI, durable goods orders, and capex announcements typically follow the XLV/XLI ratio by two to four months. When the ratio breaks above its 200-day moving average from below, ISM PMI typically rolls over within one quarter. The current ratio is at 0.863; a sustained move above 0.92 would indicate defensive rotation has arrived.
How does Fed policy affect the XLV/XLI relationship?+
Both sectors have rate exposure but through different channels. XLV is moderately rate-sensitive: pharma dividends compete with Treasury yields and pharma R and D depends on cost of capital. XLI is more cyclically rate-sensitive: industrial capex buyers borrow heavily, and rate cuts directly stimulate equipment-financing demand. The 2024 Fed easing cycle (100 basis points of cuts September through December 2024) contributed materially to the late-2024 XLI rally that pushed XLV/XLI to its 0.79 low. Restrictive policy typically favors XLV; accommodative policy favors XLI.
What is the Iran war's impact on the XLV/XLI ratio?+
Asymmetric effects. XLI has gained from defense procurement: RTX, Lockheed, Northrop combined are roughly 9 percent of XLI, and these names rose 15 to 25 percent year-to-date 2026 on accelerated US and allied munitions orders. XLV has been roughly flat: defensive sectors typically benefit during geopolitical risk, but ongoing GLP-1 pricing pressure and IRA drug-price political risk have offset the safety bid. The XLV/XLI ratio has stayed in the 0.84 to 0.88 range through April 2026 rather than rising decisively, indicating the market is pricing the Iran war as an industrial-demand event rather than recession-imminent.
How do I trade XLV vs XLI?+
Track three things. First, the 200-day moving average of the XLV/XLI ratio (currently approximately 0.85). Cross above with rising slope is the late-cycle rotation signal. Second, ISM Manufacturing PMI direction; rolling below 50 with XLV/XLI rising confirms rotation. Third, Lilly individual performance; because Lilly is 13.80 percent of XLV, idiosyncratic Lilly moves can drive the ratio without genuine sector rotation. Long XLV / short XLI captures defensive positioning with hedged market beta; benefits from ISM rolling, defense-spending peak, AI capex deceleration. Short XLV / long XLI benefits from continued cyclical strength and AI capex sustaining. Position sizing should account for XLV approximately 16 percent annualized volatility versus XLI approximately 19 percent.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.