CONVEX
Glossary/Crypto & Digital Assets/CBDC
Crypto & Digital Assets
9 min readUpdated Apr 12, 2026

CBDC

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·
central bank digital currencydigital dollardigital yuane-CNYFedNowdigital eurodigital currency

A Central Bank Digital Currency, a digital form of a country's sovereign currency issued and controlled directly by the central bank. Unlike cryptocurrency, CBDCs are centralised, programmable money that could give governments unprecedented visibility and control over financial flows.

Current Macro RegimeSTAGFLATIONDEEPENING

The macro regime is unambiguously STAGFLATION DEEPENING. The hot CPI print (pending event, 24h ago) is not a surprise — it is a CONFIRMATION of the pipeline signals that have been building for weeks: PPI accelerating faster than CPI, Cleveland nowcast at 5.28%, breakevens rising +10bp 1M across the …

Analysis from May 14, 2026

What Is a CBDC?

A Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) is a digital form of a nation's sovereign currency, issued and controlled directly by the central bank. Unlike a bank deposit (which is a claim on a commercial bank) or a stablecoin (issued by a private company), a CBDC is a direct liability of the central bank, the digital equivalent of physical cash, but with programmable capabilities that could fundamentally alter how money works.

Over 130 countries representing 98% of global GDP are exploring or piloting CBDCs as of 2024. China's e-CNY is the most advanced major deployment, having processed over $950 billion in transactions during its pilot phase. The European Central Bank is developing a digital euro. India launched a digital rupee pilot. Meanwhile, the United States has become one of the most politically resistant to retail CBDCs, with bipartisan legislation introduced to block their issuance.

The CBDC debate sits at the intersection of monetary policy innovation, financial surveillance, geopolitical competition, and civil liberties, making it one of the most consequential financial topics of the decade.

CBDC Design Models

Retail CBDC (Direct-to-Public)

In a retail CBDC model, individuals and businesses hold digital currency accounts directly with (or through intermediaries connected to) the central bank. This is the most radical model, it would allow citizens to "bank" with the Fed, bypassing commercial banks entirely.

Feature Retail CBDC Current System
Issuer Central bank Commercial banks (deposits)
Risk Zero default risk (central bank liability) Bank default risk (FDIC insured up to $250K)
Settlement Instant, 24/7 1-3 business days (ACH); instant only via FedNow
Privacy Government-visible (potentially) Bank-visible; some government access
Programmability Yes (expiration, restrictions possible) No (money is fungible)
Interest Can be set by central bank (including negative) Set by commercial banks
Access Anyone with digital wallet (no bank required) Bank account required

Wholesale CBDC (Institutional Only)

Wholesale CBDCs are restricted to financial institutions for interbank settlement. This is less controversial because it resembles the existing central bank reserve system, just on modern digital infrastructure.

Project mBridge (BIS, PBOC, HKMA, Bank of Thailand, Central Bank of UAE): A multi-CBDC platform for instant cross-border payments between participating central banks. It has processed over $22 million in real transactions and demonstrated settlement times of seconds rather than the current 2-5 days for cross-border wire transfers.

Singapore's Project Ubin / Orchid: Developed technology for both wholesale and retail CBDC, with a focus on programmable payments for trade finance.

Hybrid/Two-Tier Model

Most planned CBDCs use a hybrid approach: the central bank issues the CBDC, but distribution and wallet services are handled by commercial banks and licensed payment providers. This preserves the banking system's role while adding central bank digital money as a new option.

China's e-CNY uses this model: the PBOC issues e-CNY to state banks (ICBC, Bank of China, etc.), which then offer e-CNY wallets to the public through their apps.

The Global CBDC Landscape

Country/Region CBDC Name Status (2024) Key Feature
China e-CNY (digital yuan) Advanced pilot (26 cities) 120M+ wallets; $950B+ in transactions
EU Digital Euro Development phase (ECB) Expected prototype by 2025-2026
UK Digital Pound ("Britcoin") Research/consultation Bank of England + HM Treasury design phase
India Digital Rupee (e₹) Wholesale + retail pilots Both wholesale (bond settlement) and retail
Brazil Drex Pilot phase Focused on tokenised asset settlement
Nigeria eNaira Launched Oct 2021 Struggled with adoption (<1% of population)
Bahamas Sand Dollar Launched Oct 2020 First national CBDC; small island economy
Jamaica JAM-DEX Launched June 2022 Limited adoption so far
US None planned Research only; political opposition FedNow instant payments launched July 2023

CBDCs and Monetary Policy: New Tools

The Programmable Money Toolkit

CBDCs could enable monetary policy tools that are currently impossible or impractical:

1. Direct Money Drops

During COVID-19, US stimulus checks took weeks to reach recipients, required IRS tax records, and excluded millions of unbanked citizens. With a CBDC, the Fed could deposit funds directly into every citizen's digital wallet within minutes, no banks, no IRS, no processing delays.

2. Negative Interest Rates (Beyond the Zero Bound)

The "zero lower bound" is one of the most constraining limits in monetary policy: central banks cannot push rates meaningfully below zero because depositors will withdraw cash. A CBDC (especially if combined with restrictions on physical cash) removes this constraint. If the ECB could impose -3% rates on digital euro balances, it would powerfully incentivize spending during deflationary episodes. This possibility is among the most controversial aspects of CBDCs.

3. Expiring or Restricted Money

China has experimented with expiring e-CNY coupons in pilot programs, digital currency that must be spent within a specified timeframe or its value declines. This is the monetary policy equivalent of "use it or lose it", designed to prevent hoarding and force spending during recessions.

CBDCs could also be restricted by spending category (only for food, only at small businesses, only for domestic transactions), a level of policy precision impossible with fungible cash.

4. Real-Time Economic Data

A fully adopted CBDC would give the central bank real-time, granular data on spending patterns, velocity of money, regional economic activity, and the transmission of monetary policy. Currently, central banks rely on lagging survey data (CPI is published monthly, GDP quarterly). CBDC data could enable near-real-time policy adjustments.

The Privacy and Civil Liberties Debate

The Surveillance Concern

A retail CBDC would potentially give the government complete visibility into every financial transaction, what you buy, when, from whom, and how much. This raises profound civil liberties concerns:

  • Could the government freeze the CBDC wallets of political dissidents, protesters, or disfavored organisations?
  • Could spending be restricted to government-approved categories?
  • Could financial behaviour be used for social credit scoring?

These are not hypothetical concerns. In February 2022, the Canadian government invoked emergency powers to freeze the bank accounts of truckers protesting COVID-19 mandates, without court orders. A CBDC would make such actions far easier, faster, and more granular.

The Counter-Argument

CBDC proponents argue that: (1) Cash is already declining, most transactions are already digital and visible to banks. (2) CBDCs can be designed with privacy protections, tiered anonymity where small transactions are private while large transactions require identification. (3) The alternative (unregulated crypto, stablecoins) may be worse for consumers (hacks, rug pulls, no recourse). (4) Financial inclusion benefits outweigh privacy costs, the 5.9 million unbanked US households could gain access to basic financial services.

Design Choices That Determine Privacy

Feature Privacy-Preserving Surveillance-Enabling
Transaction visibility Tiered anonymity (small = private) All transactions visible to central bank
Programmability None (money is fungible like cash) Spending restrictions, expiration, categories
Offline capability Yes (cash-like, no tracking) No (all transactions require network)
Account model Token-based (like cash, bearer instrument) Account-based (identity-linked)
Data retention Minimal; auto-deleted Comprehensive; permanent record

CBDCs and the Banking System

The Disintermediation Risk

If citizens can hold digital currency directly at the central bank (earning the central bank rate, with zero counterparty risk), why would they keep deposits at commercial banks? This threatens the fractional reserve banking model: banks use deposits to make loans, creating credit and earning the spread between deposit and lending rates. If deposits move to CBDC wallets, banks lose their cheapest funding source and their ability to create credit shrinks.

The bank run amplifier: In a crisis, depositors currently face friction in moving money (FDIC insurance, transfer limits, branch hours). CBDCs could enable instant, unlimited transfers from bank deposits to central bank digital currency, potentially accelerating bank runs. The March 2023 SVB collapse demonstrated how quickly deposits can flee via digital banking; CBDCs would make this even faster.

Potential solutions: (1) Cap CBDC holdings (e.g., max $10,000 per individual) to preserve bank deposits. (2) Pay zero or negative interest on CBDC balances above a threshold. (3) Require CBDC to be distributed through banks, preserving their intermediary role.

The Geopolitical Dimension

Dollar Hegemony vs Digital Yuan

CBDCs are a key battleground in the US-China geopolitical rivalry:

Factor US Dollar System Chinese e-CNY
Cross-border payments SWIFT (3-5 days, high fees, US oversight) mBridge (seconds, low fees, no US oversight)
Sanctions enforcement SWIFT exclusion is devastating (Russia, Iran) e-CNY could bypass SWIFT entirely
Data access US can monitor dollar flows globally China gains visibility into e-CNY flows
Adoption Dollar is reserve currency; network effects e-CNY in pilot; small adoption so far

The strategic concern: if countries under US sanctions (Russia, Iran, North Korea) or those seeking to reduce dollar dependence (Saudi Arabia, Brazil, India) adopt digital yuan or yuan-denominated CBDCs for trade settlement, it erodes the dollar's dominance in international payments, weakening the US's ability to enforce economic sanctions.

Reality check: The dollar's reserve currency status is far deeper than payments infrastructure. It is rooted in the depth and liquidity of US capital markets, the rule of law, and the absence of capital controls. The e-CNY cannot replicate these advantages. But at the margin, CBDCs could accelerate a slow shift toward a multi-currency international system.

CBDCs, Bitcoin, and Gold: The Asset Class Implications

The Paradoxical Bullish Case for Hard Assets

CBDCs strengthen the investment thesis for assets that governments cannot control:

Bitcoin: The contrast between a programmable government currency (trackable, freezable, expirable) and Bitcoin (permissionless, censorship-resistant, fixed supply, globally transferable) has never been sharper. In countries where CBDC surveillance concerns are strongest, Bitcoin adoption has been highest, Nigeria banned CBDCs for crypto transactions; Nigerian Bitcoin adoption surged. Bitcoin becomes the "exit" from programmable government money.

Gold: Physical gold held outside the financial system has no digital footprint, no counterparty, and no programmability. As money becomes increasingly digital and trackable, the privacy properties of physical gold become more valuable. Central bank gold purchases have been at multi-decade highs (1,000+ tonnes/year in 2022-2023), partly reflecting this same logic at the sovereign level.

Stablecoins: Privately issued stablecoins (USDT, USDC) offer digital dollar convenience without direct government control, but regulated stablecoins would likely be subject to the same freeze/surveillance capabilities as CBDCs. Only Bitcoin remains truly censorship-resistant at the protocol level.

The FedNow Alternative

The US launched FedNow in July 2023, a real-time payments system that enables instant, 24/7 bank-to-bank transfers. FedNow achieves many of the payment efficiency goals of a CBDC (instant settlement, 24/7 availability, lower costs) without creating a new form of money or raising the surveillance and bank disintermediation concerns of a retail CBDC.

This may effectively be the US answer to CBDCs: modernize the payments infrastructure while preserving the existing bank-based monetary architecture. Rather than competing with private stablecoins and crypto through a government CBDC, the US may regulate stablecoins as a form of private-sector digital dollar, leveraging innovation without the political toxicity of a Fed-issued digital currency.

What to Watch

  1. China's e-CNY adoption metrics, if e-CNY transactions grow from <0.2% to 5%+ of Chinese digital payments, it signals real adoption and geopolitical implications for the dollar.
  2. European digital euro timeline, ECB target of prototype by 2025-2026; any acceleration or delay signals broader CBDC momentum.
  3. US stablecoin legislation, if Congress passes stablecoin regulation (requiring full T-bill backing and audits), it effectively creates "private CBDCs" and reduces pressure for a Fed-issued version.
  4. Central bank gold purchases, sustained 1,000+ tonne/year purchases suggest central banks themselves are hedging against digital currency risks.
  5. Bitcoin adoption in CBDC-active countries, rising Bitcoin usage in China, Nigeria, and India as CBDCs roll out would confirm the "freedom hedge" thesis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a CBDC and existing digital money?
Most people already use "digital money" — bank deposits accessed via apps, credit cards, and payment platforms like Venmo or PayPal. A CBDC is fundamentally different in one critical respect: it is a direct liability of the central bank, not a commercial bank. When you have $1,000 in your Chase account, you hold a claim on Chase — if Chase fails, you need FDIC insurance to recover your funds. When you hold $1,000 in a retail CBDC, you hold a claim directly on the Federal Reserve (or equivalent central bank), which cannot fail because it can create the currency it owes you. This mirrors the relationship you have with physical cash: a $100 bill is a Federal Reserve note — a direct central bank liability. A CBDC extends this relationship into the digital realm. The second key difference is programmability: existing digital money (bank deposits) can be frozen by courts or banks, but it cannot be programmed to expire, restrict spending categories, or automatically apply negative interest rates. CBDCs potentially can — and this is what makes them both powerful (for monetary policy) and concerning (for civil liberties). A third difference: CBDCs could eliminate the need for intermediaries in payments. Today, a payment from your account to a merchant traverses multiple banks, card networks, and clearing houses over 1-3 days. A CBDC payment could be instant, peer-to-peer, and free — disintermediting the entire $100B+ global payments industry.
How advanced is China's digital yuan (e-CNY)?
China's e-CNY is the most advanced major-economy CBDC, having been in pilot since April 2020. By late 2023, the e-CNY had processed over 7 trillion yuan (~$950 billion) in cumulative transactions across 26 pilot cities and regions. Over 120 million individual wallets and 9.5 million merchant wallets had been opened. However, adoption remains modest relative to China's $40+ trillion annual digital payment market: e-CNY represents less than 0.2% of China's total digital payments (which are dominated by Alipay and WeChat Pay). The Chinese government has integrated e-CNY into government salary payments, tax refunds, subway fare payments, and cross-border settlement pilots with Hong Kong, Thailand, and the UAE (Project mBridge). Key design features: the e-CNY uses a two-tier system — the PBOC issues e-CNY to commercial banks, which distribute it to the public (preserving the banking system's role). It supports "controlled anonymity" — small transactions can be anonymous, but larger ones require identification. Offline payments are supported via NFC technology. The geopolitical dimension: the e-CNY is widely viewed as China's attempt to reduce dependence on the US dollar for international trade settlement and to establish a technical standard for digital currencies that could compete with the dollar's global payments infrastructure.
Will the United States launch a digital dollar?
As of 2024-2025, the US is among the least likely major economies to launch a retail CBDC in the near term, due to political opposition from both sides. Republican opposition centers on financial privacy and government surveillance concerns — multiple bills have been introduced to prohibit the Fed from issuing a retail CBDC (including the "CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act"). The argument: a Fed-issued digital dollar could give the government real-time visibility into every transaction and the ability to freeze or restrict spending. Democratic opposition is softer but includes concerns about bank disintermediation — if citizens can hold digital dollars at the Fed, why would they maintain bank deposits? This could destabilize the banking system. The Fed itself has been cautious. The Fed's January 2022 discussion paper stated it "does not intend to proceed with issuance of a CBDC without clear support from the executive branch and from Congress." The Boston Fed's Project Hamilton (technical research with MIT) published findings but no launch timeline. What IS happening: the US launched FedNow in July 2023 — an instant payment system that allows 24/7 real-time payments between banks. This achieves many of the payment efficiency goals of a CBDC without the political controversy of a central bank digital currency. FedNow may effectively be the US answer to CBDCs — improving payments infrastructure without creating a new form of money. The most likely scenario: the US focuses on regulating stablecoins (privately issued digital dollars backed by Treasuries) rather than issuing its own CBDC. This achieves the dollar-primacy goal without the political toxicity.
How could CBDCs change monetary policy?
CBDCs would give central banks unprecedented monetary policy tools that are currently impossible or impractical: (1) Direct monetary transfers ("helicopter money") — during COVID, the US government sent stimulus checks through a complex process involving the IRS, Treasury, banks, and the postal service. With a CBDC, the Fed could deposit money directly into every citizen's digital wallet instantly. No banks, no processing delays, no unbanked exclusions. A future pandemic response could send $1,000 to 330 million Americans within minutes. (2) Negative interest rates — currently, the zero lower bound constrains central banks because people can withdraw cash to avoid negative rates. With a CBDC (and if physical cash is eliminated or restricted), the central bank could impose -2% or -3% rates directly on holdings, effectively taxing savings to encourage spending during recessions. This is the most radical and controversial possibility. (3) Programmable stimulus — CBDCs could be issued with expiration dates (spend within 90 days or the value declines) or spending restrictions (usable only at small businesses, or only for food and housing). China has experimented with expiring e-CNY coupons in pilot programs. (4) Automatic stabilizers — CBDC systems could automatically adjust tax rates or transfer payments based on real-time economic data, reducing the lag between economic conditions and policy response. (5) Financial inclusion — approximately 4.5% of US households (5.9 million) are "unbanked." A Fed-issued CBDC wallet would provide basic financial services to everyone without requiring a bank relationship.
How do CBDCs affect the investment case for Bitcoin and gold?
The CBDC trend has paradoxically strengthened the investment thesis for both Bitcoin and gold — the very assets CBDCs might be seen as competing with. The argument: as governments develop tools for financial surveillance, programmable spending restrictions, and potential negative interest rates, demand increases for assets that governments cannot control, monitor, or debase. Bitcoin: the CBDC debate has crystallized Bitcoin's value proposition as "freedom money" — permissionless, censorship-resistant, with a fixed supply of 21 million coins that no government can alter. The contrast between a programmable government digital currency (that can be frozen, expired, or restricted) and Bitcoin (which can be sent to anyone, anywhere, at any time without permission) is the sharpest it has ever been. In countries where CBDC surveillance concerns are strongest (China, Nigeria), Bitcoin adoption has been highest. Gold: physical gold — held outside the banking system — cannot be tracked, frozen, or programmed. CBDCs may be digital, but a gold coin in a safe has no counterparty risk and no digital footprint. This strengthens gold's role as the ultimate "no counterparty" store of value. Stablecoins: privately issued stablecoins (USDT, USDC) represent a middle ground — digital dollar convenience without direct government control. However, regulated stablecoins would likely be subject to the same surveillance and freeze capabilities as CBDCs, potentially leaving Bitcoin as the only truly censorship-resistant digital monetary asset. For portfolio implications: the CBDC trend is a long-term structural tailwind for hard assets. The stronger the government's push toward programmable money, the stronger the demand for assets that preserve financial autonomy.

CBDC is one of the signals monitored daily in the AI-driven macro analysis on Convex Trading. The platform synthesises data across monetary policy, credit, sentiment, and on-chain metrics to generate actionable trade recommendations. Create a free account to build your own signal layer and see how CBDC is influencing current positions.

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Macro briefings in your inbox

Daily analysis that explains which glossary signals are firing and why.