Developed ex-US (EFA) vs Nasdaq 100 (QQQ): The Global Equity Rotation Hub
EFA closed at approximately $103 on April 29, 2026 against QQQ at $657.55, with EFA outperforming QQQ year-to-date 2026 by approximately 18 percentage points (EFA +12 percent vs QQQ -6 percent). DIA traded at $488.67 with broad sector strength.
Also known as: EAFE Developed (EFA) (ETF_EFA, EAFE, developed markets) · Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) (ETF_QQQ, Nasdaq, NDX)
Why This Comparison Matters
EFA closed at approximately $103 on April 29, 2026 against QQQ at $657.55, with EFA outperforming QQQ year-to-date 2026 by approximately 18 percentage points (EFA +12 percent vs QQQ -6 percent). DIA traded at $488.67 with broad sector strength. IWM traded at $270.95 leading SPY. EEM traded at $62.67 with steady gains. The cross-section of these five non-mega-cap-tech equity exposures captures the cleanest evidence in 14 years that the US-exceptionalism cycle (2010 to 2024) is breaking. This hub page covers EFA, DIA, IWM, EEM, and QQQ in dedicated sections that each capture a specific rotation question: developed-international vs US tech, large-cap blue-chip vs small-cap, EM vs US small-cap, and the broader global rotation regime.
The April 2026 Snapshot: Five-Way Rotation Map
April 29, 2026 prices: QQQ $657.55 (up 16.85 percent over the past month after the post-Iran-shock rally), SPY approximately $712, DIA $488.67, IWM $270.95, EFA approximately $103, EEM $62.67. Year-to-date 2026 returns: EFA +12 percent (driven by European industrials and Japanese exporters benefiting from yen weakness), DIA +5 percent, IWM +6 percent, EEM +5 percent, SPY -2 percent, QQQ -6 percent.
The rotation pattern is unusual: every major non-tech equity exposure is outperforming SPY and QQQ year-to-date. The combination signals broad market rotation away from mega-cap-tech concentration, with developed international leading. Over 24 months: EFA +20 percent, EEM +18 percent, IWM +25 percent, DIA +18 percent (similar to broader market), SPY +28 percent (still leads), QQQ +35 percent (mega-cap tech outperformance). The 2026 reversal of these multi-year trends is the central rotation question.
EFA vs QQQ: US Tech vs Developed International
EFA tracks the MSCI EAFE index (Europe, Australasia, Far East developed markets) using cap-weighting. QQQ tracks the Nasdaq 100 (tech-heavy US large-cap). The pair captures the fundamental US-exceptionalism question: should investors prioritize US tech earnings power or international diversification?
From 2010 through 2024, QQQ beat EFA by approximately 350 percentage points cumulative (QQQ +650 percent versus EFA approximately +110 percent over 14 years). The 14-year US-exceptionalism cycle was driven by mega-cap tech earnings dominance plus US dollar strength plus European banking-system fragility plus Japanese demographic deflation. All four factors are now reversing in 2025 to 2026.
April 2026 reading: EFA outperformed QQQ by approximately 18 percentage points year-to-date (EFA +12 percent vs QQQ -6 percent). This is the cleanest reversal of the 14-year trend on record. Drivers: (1) Mag-7 earnings deceleration from 50+ percent year-over-year (peak 2023) to 15-20 percent year-over-year; (2) AI capex margin compression on Mag-7 free cash flow; (3) European recovery on lower energy costs and ECB easing; (4) Japanese export strength on persistent yen weakness; (5) DXY weakness providing tailwind for unhedged USD investors in international exposure. Whether the reversal is sustained or temporary is the central question for 2026 to 2027 allocation.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in EAFE Developed (EFA). Computed from 1,289 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) falls 0.07% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.30%. 129 qualifying events; Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) closed positive in 53% of them.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the April 30, 2026 levels for the major global equity ETFs?+
QQQ $657.55, SPY approximately $712, DIA $488.67, IWM $270.95, EFA approximately $103, EEM $62.67. Year-to-date 2026 returns: EFA +12 percent (leading), DIA +5 percent, IWM +6 percent, EEM +5 percent, SPY -2 percent, QQQ -6 percent. Every major non-tech equity exposure is outperforming both SPY and QQQ year-to-date, signaling broad market rotation away from mega-cap-tech concentration.
Has the 14-year US exceptionalism cycle ended?+
It is in early stages of reversal. From 2010 through 2024, QQQ beat EFA by approximately 590 percentage points cumulative (QQQ +650 percent vs EFA +60 percent). Year-to-date 2026, EFA has outperformed QQQ by 18 percentage points (EFA +12 percent vs QQQ -6 percent), the cleanest reversal in 14 years. Drivers: Mag-7 earnings deceleration (50+ percent YoY peak 2023 to 15-20 percent currently), dollar weakness (DXY -10 percent from October 2022 peak), European/Japanese recovery, AI capex margin compression on Mag-7 free cash flow.
Why does EFA outperform when the dollar weakens?+
EFA returns for unhedged USD investors are roughly 50 percent currency-driven and 50 percent local-equity-driven. When the dollar weakens against EFA constituent currencies (EUR, JPY, GBP, CHF, AUD, etc.), the USD-translated value of EFA holdings rises mechanically. The 2010-2022 dollar appreciation diluted EFA returns by approximately 35 percent over the period; the 2022-2026 dollar weakness is now adding tailwind. Hedged EFA variants (DBEF, HEFA) substantially outperformed unhedged EFA over 2014-2022; current dynamics favor unhedged.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.