S&P 500 vs China Large-Cap
SPY closed near $708 in mid-April 2026; FXI closed at $35.56 on April 5, 2026, with 52-week range $29.21 to $42.00. FXI tracks 50 large-cap Chinese equities listed in Hong Kong (H-shares, P-chips, Red Chips).
Also known as: S&P 500 ETF (SPY) (ETF_SPY, S&P 500, SPX, SP500) · China Large-Cap (FXI) (ETF_FXI, China ETF)
Why This Comparison Matters
SPY closed near $708 in mid-April 2026; FXI closed at $35.56 on April 5, 2026, with 52-week range $29.21 to $42.00. FXI tracks 50 large-cap Chinese equities listed in Hong Kong (H-shares, P-chips, Red Chips). The fund has heavy financials and energy exposure with light tech and consumer weighting compared to MSCI China indices. Top holdings include Tencent, Alibaba, Meituan, Ping An Insurance, JD.com, ICBC, China Construction Bank, and Bank of China. FXI has rallied substantially in 2025-2026 from the 2024 lows on Chinese policy stimulus including PBoC rate cuts, fiscal expansion, property sector intervention, and regulatory clarity for major tech platforms. The pair captures the most fundamental geopolitical-economic rivalry trade in equity markets.
FXI Composition
FXI is a concentrated portfolio of 50 large-cap Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong. The fund holds H-shares (Hong Kong-listed shares of Chinese mainland companies), P-chips (Hong Kong-incorporated Chinese companies), and Red Chips (Hong Kong-listed Chinese state-owned enterprises). The Hong Kong listing matters: it provides USD-denominated access to Chinese equities for international investors who cannot directly access Shanghai or Shenzhen markets.
Top holdings (April 2026): Tencent ~10 percent, Alibaba ~8 percent, Meituan ~5 percent, JD.com ~3 percent, Ping An Insurance ~3 percent, ICBC ~3 percent, China Construction Bank ~3 percent, Bank of China ~2 percent, China Mobile ~2 percent, BYD ~2 percent. Top 10 represent approximately 41 percent of FXI assets.
Sector composition: Communications (Tencent, etc) ~25 percent, Financials (banks, insurers) ~22 percent, Consumer Discretionary (Alibaba, Meituan, JD, BYD) ~22 percent, Energy ~10 percent, Industrials ~6 percent, Tech ~5 percent. The financials and energy concentration is structurally heavier than broader MSCI China indices, while tech weight is lighter (FXI excludes US-listed Chinese ADRs that dominate other China ETFs like KWEB).
The 2024-2026 China Stimulus Cycle
FXI has rallied from the 2024 lows around $24-25 to current $35.56, approximately 40-45 percent gain. Three drivers compounded.
First, PBoC monetary stimulus: 2024-2026 saw multiple rate cuts, reserve requirement ratio reductions, and targeted liquidity facilities. The PBoC took policy rate from 2.50 percent to 2.00 percent through cycle. RRR reductions added approximately 2 trillion yuan in lending capacity.
Second, fiscal stimulus: 2024-2026 fiscal package totaling approximately 10 trillion yuan ($1.4 trillion) including infrastructure spending, local government debt restructuring, property sector intervention. Fiscal deficit increased to approximately 4 percent of GDP from 3 percent.
Third, regulatory clarity: 2024-2026 marked the end of the 2021-2023 China tech regulatory campaign. Tencent, Alibaba, JD all received clearer regulatory frameworks. New game licenses resumed, anti-monopoly fines settled, education sector restructuring finalized. Tech equity multiples re-rated as overhang lifted.
The Property Sector Story
China property sector remains the dominant FXI risk factor. The 2021-2024 property crisis produced Evergrande default, Country Garden distress, and broader developer collapse. FXI has limited direct property exposure (largest property developer in FXI is China Vanke at <1 percent), but indirect exposure through banks (lending to developers and homeowners) is substantial.
Major Chinese banks (ICBC, China Construction Bank, Bank of China combined ~8 percent of FXI) have approximately 25-30 percent of their loan books in property-related lending. Property NPL recognition has been gradual through 2024-2026. The 2024-2026 stimulus has stabilized but not fully resolved property sector stress.
Key 2026 indicators: new home prices, property developer financing access, household property purchase intentions. Stabilization extends FXI rally; renewed deterioration reverses gains. The 2026 setup is one of cautious stabilization with significant tail risk.
The 2010-2024 China Lost Decade
From 2010 through 2024, FXI gained approximately 5 percent total return (essentially flat) while SPY gained 350 percent (345 percentage point cumulative SPY outperformance). The China underperformance was unprecedented: at no other 14-year window since FXI inception had Chinese equities lagged so dramatically.
Drivers: First, structural growth deceleration: China GDP growth slowed from 10 percent annual (2000s) to 5-6 percent (2015-2024). Second, regulatory campaigns: 2018-2019 deleveraging, 2021-2023 tech crackdown produced sustained equity multiple compression. Third, US-China trade tensions: 2018 onwards tariffs, semiconductor restrictions, investment ban produced material Chinese equity headwinds. Fourth, property crisis: 2021-2024 property sector collapse weighed broadly on Chinese economy and equities.
The Chinese equity allocation in global portfolios dropped from peak ~5 percent in 2010 to ~2 percent in 2024 as foreign capital withdrew and domestic investors increasingly preferred A-shares (Shanghai/Shenzhen-listed) over H-shares.
The Geopolitical Risk Layer
FXI has unique geopolitical risk that no other equity ETF has. Three scenarios materially affect FXI but not SPY.
First, Taiwan Strait conflict: any military escalation between China and Taiwan would devastate FXI (likely 30-50 percent decline in days). The Iran war 2026 has not directly affected China-Taiwan dynamics, but ongoing tension produces persistent risk premium in FXI.
Second, US trade restrictions: tariffs on Chinese goods, semiconductor export restrictions, investment bans. The 2024-2026 US administration has continued and expanded restrictions. Each new restriction produces 3-8 percent FXI immediate decline.
Third, Hong Kong status: Hong Kong's ongoing political integration with mainland China has not yet affected its capital markets infrastructure but represents tail risk. If Hong Kong loses its special status (USD peg, separate legal system, capital flow openness), FXI structure would be materially affected.
The geopolitical premium produces persistent FXI multiple discount versus US equities. FXI forward P/E ~10x vs SPY ~22x reflects this geopolitical tail risk plus the structural growth concerns.
Volatility and Correlation
FXI realized volatility is approximately 28 percent annualized vs SPY 16-17 percent. The 1.7x volatility ratio reflects China-specific risks plus currency risk. FXI is unhedged: USD investors bear full exposure to USDCNY moves (but stabilized somewhat by Hong Kong dollar peg to USD for the Hong Kong-listed shares; underlying mainland exposure produces CNY currency risk).
60-day rolling correlation between SPY and FXI averages approximately 0.55. During risk-off periods correlation rises to 0.75-0.85; during China-specific episodes drops to 0.30-0.45. Current April 2026 correlation approximately 0.50, reflecting the China-specific stimulus rally regime.
For pair-trade sizing, the 1.7x volatility plus 0.55 correlation produces a hedge ratio of approximately 0.55 SPY per 1 FXI (dollar-weighted) for beta-neutral positioning. The pair has higher tracking error than SPY-vs-EFA or SPY-vs-EEM because China-specific risks are larger.
How the Pair Performs in Crises
China-specific crises have produced extreme SPY-vs-FXI divergence. The 2008-2009 GFC: FXI fell 65 percent peak-to-trough vs SPY 56 percent. The 2014-2015 China crisis: FXI fell 35 percent peak-to-trough vs SPY +5 percent (40 percentage point divergence in 6 months from Shanghai composite collapse). The 2021-2024 China tech regulatory + property crisis: FXI fell 50 percent peak-to-trough vs SPY +60 percent (110 percentage point divergence).
US-specific crises have produced opposite divergence. The 2020 COVID: FXI fell 18 percent peak-to-trough vs SPY 34 percent (China handled COVID earlier and better in 2020). The 2022 hiking cycle: FXI fell 40 percent vs SPY 25 percent (initial divergence) but recovered faster as China policy responded.
Pattern: FXI is highly sensitive to China-specific factors. China policy reversals, regulatory campaigns, property crises produce extreme FXI moves independent of broader equity markets. SPY is much more resilient to China-specific stress but vulnerable to global crises that affect China equally.
How Fed Policy Affects FXI
Fed policy affects FXI primarily through dollar exchange rate and global risk appetite. Restrictive Fed (2022-2024 hiking) drove dollar strength that hurt FXI through CNY currency translation and global risk-off rotation. Accommodative Fed (2024-2026 cutting) reverses these dynamics.
The interplay is not as direct as for EM broadly because China runs largely independent monetary policy. PBoC policy is set based on Chinese economic conditions, not Fed. However, capital flows respond to relative US-China yield differentials. When Fed cuts and PBoC eases simultaneously, both effects support FXI through liquidity expansion.
The current 2025-2026 setup with Fed cuts plus PBoC stimulus has been favorable for FXI. The dual easing produces compounding effects: dollar weakness boosts FXI USD returns; Chinese liquidity expansion supports underlying equity valuations. The 40-45 percent FXI rally from 2024 lows reflects both dynamics.
Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool
For pair traders, the SPY/FXI ratio currently trades at approximately 19.9 (SPY $708 / FXI $35.56). The 12-month range is approximately 17.5 to 25.0. The 5-year range is 17.5 to 30.0 (SPY peak in late 2024). Above 25.0 indicates SPY extreme outperformance; below 17.5 indicates broader FXI rally.
Long SPY / short FXI captures continued China stress: benefits from China property re-deterioration, regulatory campaign reactivation, US-China tension escalation, Taiwan Strait risk emergence. Long FXI / short SPY captures China stimulus + recovery: benefits from continued PBoC easing, fiscal stimulus expansion, property stabilization, US-China relationship improvement. Position sizing should account for FXI 28 percent annualized volatility versus SPY 16-17 percent.
The pair has produced highly variable returns. From 2010-2024 cumulative long SPY short FXI gained 345 percentage points. The 2024-2026 partial reversal has produced approximately 40 percentage points of FXI outperformance. Trend continuation requires China stimulus extending; reversal requires geopolitical stress reactivating.
The April 2026 Configuration
SPY ~$708, FXI $35.56 (April 5 2026), ratio 19.9. FXI 52-week range $29.21-$42.00. FXI rallied 40-45% from 2024 lows on China stimulus. Tencent and Alibaba +30-50% on regulatory clarity. Property sector cautiously stabilizing.
Forward-looking: Chinese policy stance remains supportive through 2026. National People's Congress in March 2026 reaffirmed stimulus path. Property sector policy continues favorable. Tech regulatory environment stable. Risks: US-China trade restrictions could escalate; Taiwan Strait tensions persist; property sector relapse possible.
Watch the SPY/FXI ratio for moves outside 17.5 to 25.0. Below 17.5 indicates structural China revival underway. Above 25.0 indicates China-specific stress reactivating. The pair offers leveraged exposure to China policy outcomes plus US-China geopolitical dynamics through one trade. Position carefully given FXI 28% annualized volatility.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How China Large-Cap (FXI) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Computed from 1,266 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, China Large-Cap (FXI) falls 0.37% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of -0.00%. 127 qualifying events; China Large-Cap (FXI) closed positive in 45% of them.
Following these triggers, China Large-Cap (FXI) rises 0.80% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of -0.00%. 126 qualifying events; China Large-Cap (FXI) closed positive in 60% of them.
Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What's in FXI?+
FXI is a concentrated portfolio of 50 large-cap Chinese stocks listed in Hong Kong (H-shares, P-chips, Red Chips). FXI was at $35.56 on April 5, 2026, with 52-week range $29.21-$42.00. Top holdings: Tencent ~10%, Alibaba ~8%, Meituan ~5%, JD.com ~3%, Ping An Insurance ~3%, ICBC ~3%, China Construction Bank ~3%, Bank of China ~2%, China Mobile ~2%, BYD ~2%. Top 10 = ~41% of FXI assets. Sector composition: Communications ~25%, Financials ~22%, Consumer Discretionary ~22%, Energy ~10%, Industrials ~6%, Tech ~5%. FXI excludes US-listed Chinese ADRs that dominate other China ETFs like KWEB.
What drove the 2024-2026 FXI rally?+
FXI rallied from 2024 lows ~$24-25 to current $35.56 (40-45% gain). Three drivers. First, PBoC monetary stimulus: 2024-2026 saw multiple rate cuts, RRR reductions adding ~2 trillion yuan lending capacity. Policy rate fell 2.50% to 2.00%. Second, fiscal stimulus: 2024-2026 fiscal package totaling ~10 trillion yuan ($1.4 trillion) including infrastructure, local government debt restructuring, property sector intervention. Fiscal deficit ~4% of GDP from 3%. Third, regulatory clarity: 2024-2026 marked the end of 2021-2023 China tech regulatory campaign. Tencent, Alibaba, JD received clearer frameworks. New game licenses resumed.
How is FXI exposed to property sector?+
China property sector remains the dominant FXI risk factor. 2021-2024 property crisis produced Evergrande default, Country Garden distress, broader developer collapse. FXI has limited direct property exposure (largest property developer in FXI is China Vanke <1%), but indirect exposure through banks is substantial. Major Chinese banks (ICBC, CCB, BOC combined ~8% of FXI) have ~25-30% of loan books in property-related lending. Property NPL recognition has been gradual through 2024-2026. The 2024-2026 stimulus has stabilized but not fully resolved property sector stress. Key 2026 indicators: new home prices, developer financing, household purchase intentions.
What was the 2010-2024 China lost decade?+
From 2010 through 2024, FXI gained ~5% total return (essentially flat) while SPY gained 350% (345pp cumulative SPY outperformance). Unprecedented: at no other 14-year window since FXI inception had Chinese equities lagged so dramatically. Drivers: structural growth deceleration (China GDP growth from 10% annual 2000s to 5-6% 2015-2024); regulatory campaigns (2018-2019 deleveraging, 2021-2023 tech crackdown); US-China trade tensions (2018 onwards tariffs, semiconductor restrictions); property crisis (2021-2024 collapse). Chinese equity allocation in global portfolios dropped from peak ~5% in 2010 to ~2% in 2024.
What geopolitical risks does FXI face?+
Three scenarios materially affect FXI but not SPY. First, Taiwan Strait conflict: any military escalation would devastate FXI (likely 30-50% decline in days). Iran war 2026 has not directly affected China-Taiwan, but ongoing tension produces persistent risk premium. Second, US trade restrictions: tariffs, semiconductor export restrictions, investment bans. 2024-2026 US administration has continued and expanded restrictions. Each new restriction produces 3-8% FXI immediate decline. Third, Hong Kong status: ongoing political integration with mainland represents tail risk. If Hong Kong loses special status (USD peg, separate legal system), FXI structure would be materially affected. FXI forward P/E ~10x vs SPY ~22x reflects geopolitical tail risk premium.
How volatile is FXI vs SPY?+
FXI realized volatility ~28% annualized vs SPY 16-17% (1.7x ratio). Reflects China-specific risks plus currency risk. FXI is unhedged: USD investors bear exposure to USDCNY moves (Hong Kong dollar peg to USD stabilizes somewhat for HK-listed shares; underlying mainland exposure produces CNY risk). 60-day rolling correlation averages 0.55: rises to 0.75-0.85 during risk-off, drops to 0.30-0.45 during China-specific episodes. Current April 2026 correlation ~0.50 reflecting China-specific stimulus rally regime. For pair-trade sizing, hedge ratio ~0.55 SPY per 1 FXI (dollar-weighted) for beta-neutral.
How does the pair behave in crises?+
China-specific crises produce extreme SPY-vs-FXI divergence. 2008-09 GFC: FXI -65% vs SPY -56% (9pp underperformance). 2014-2015 China crisis: FXI -35% vs SPY +5% (40pp divergence in 6 months from Shanghai collapse). 2021-2024 tech regulatory + property: FXI -50% vs SPY +60% (110pp divergence). US-specific crises: opposite. 2020 COVID: FXI -18% vs SPY -34% (China handled COVID earlier 2020). 2022 hiking: FXI -40% vs SPY -25% (initial divergence) but FXI recovered faster as China policy responded. Pattern: FXI highly sensitive to China-specific factors; SPY resilient to China stress but vulnerable to global crises.
How do I trade SPY vs FXI?+
Track the SPY/FXI ratio (currently ~19.9, 12-month range 17.5-25.0, 5-year range 17.5-30.0). Above 25.0 indicates SPY extreme outperformance; below 17.5 indicates broader FXI rally. Long SPY / short FXI captures continued China stress: benefits from property re-deterioration, regulatory campaign reactivation, US-China tension escalation, Taiwan Strait risk. Long FXI / short SPY captures China stimulus + recovery: benefits from continued PBoC easing, fiscal stimulus, property stabilization, US-China relationship improvement. Position sizing: FXI 28% annualized vol vs SPY 16-17%. Pair has been highly variable: 345pp gain 2010-2024 long SPY short FXI, then ~40pp 2024-2026 reversal long FXI short SPY.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.