Commodities Outlook 2026
Oil, gold, copper, agricultural commodities, and the broader commodity complex.
Data as of · Outlook refreshed
Current State
Commodities split into three buckets: energy (oil, gas), precious metals (gold, silver), and industrial metals/agriculture. Each responds to different macro drivers.
Macro Regime Context
Our July regime call kept a stagflation label with the trajectory pointed at reflation, and the commodity complex was the evidence for it: crude was the forward inflation impulse that the cooling realized data had not yet met. The complex is therefore where this regime gets decided rather than where it gets reflected. August splits that evidence. Brent's Aug 25 print is down 12.03% over 30 days, gold is up 9.8% over 30 days, and the food series that were running hottest have not printed since July 1. The leg the reflation case was built on is the leg that stopped confirming it.
Full regime analysis →Key Metrics
Brent's last print is down 12.03% on the month and the seaborne premium went with it
Brent printed $88.24 on Aug 25, down 7.4% in a week and down 12.03% over 30 days. Of everything that could have gone wrong for the oil view this desk carried out of July, that was the leg it could least afford to lose. The bullish call rested on a Brent-led move, a waterborne risk premium that built after the Hormuz tanker strike our July book scored as a major oil-shock signal, and the tell for it was the gap between Brent and WTI holding above the trigger the desk set. Set Brent's $88.24 against WTI at $86.39 on Aug 31 and the gap is a fraction of what that trigger required, on prints six days apart at that. The premium has not disappeared. It has stopped widening, and a premium that stops widening stops paying anyone to hold the waterborne grade.
The direction of travel reversed with it. July's move was Brent leading and WTI lagging behind; August ran the other way. WTI is $86.39 on Aug 31, up 1.18% on the week and up 2.03% over 30 days, while Brent fell 7.4% and 12.03% over the same lookbacks measured to Aug 25. Those windows end six days apart, so it is not a clean side-by-side. It is still the wrong shape for a thesis whose whole content was that the seaborne barrel carries a risk premium the domestic one does not.
Over 90 days both grades are lower, WTI down 4.99% to Aug 31 and Brent down 9.13% to Aug 25, and both sit far below the 52-week highs on their own series, $117.28 for WTI and $138.21 for Brent. That is a complex giving premium back rather than adding it. The level held; the mechanism went.
Gold's 9.8% month sits inside a 90-day round trip
Gold is $4,509.3 as of Aug 31, up 9.8% over 30 days and down 1.12% over 90. Both figures belong to the same metal, and holding them together is the read: a wide range, not a trend.
Our July book upgraded gold on a specific claim, that the real rate had stopped setting the price and that the haven and inflation-hedge bids had taken over as the marginal buyers. That call paid. Gold sits well clear of the marker the desk named as its invalidation and well above where it was priced when the upgrade was written, and it got there in a month when the energy leg of the same book went the other way.
Last week complicates it: down 4.12%. That is a real give-back, and it landed with gold still short of its 52-week high, which is the part that matters more than the weekly print. A metal that runs 9.8% in a month and remains below a level it traded at some point in the past year has not broken out of anything, and the 90-day figure says so from the other side.
The view I would defend is narrower than July's. Gold has shown it can rise into a rising real yield, which is the claim that earned the upgrade. It has not shown it can hold a level. The strongest case against me is the 30-day number: 9.8% is not noise, and it was made across a window ending Aug 31 while Brent's own 30-day window, ending Aug 25, ran 12.03% the other way. If precious metals are separating from energy rather than tracking it, that is the bid our July work identified, still working, and one 4.12% week is thin evidence for calling it finished.
Why is copper near its 52-week high while iron ore sits on its floor?
Both of those prints carry the same date, July 1, so read them as a picture of early summer and not of this week's market. On that date copper came in a shade under its own 52-week high, having gone nowhere over the previous 30 days at -0.07% while adding 5.06% over 90. Iron ore, observed the same day, sat a fraction above its 52-week low, down 2.12% over 30 days and 7.12% over 90.
Two industrial inputs, one observation date, opposite ends of their own ranges. The standard story runs both off the same demand, and on July 1 they were not saying the same thing. I cannot settle why from what is here: this pull carries no China PMI, no inventory series, and I am not going to invent a mine or a smelter to close the gap. What I will say is that anyone using copper as the clean read on industrial demand should look at iron ore first and then decide whether they still believe it.
Which brings up the watch signal this page has carried for months. The copper/gold ratio cannot be read at all at the moment, and pretending otherwise is worse than leaving it out. Copper's most recent print is 61 days old. Gold is priced to Aug 31 and has moved 9.8% over its own trailing 30 days. Divide a July 1 numerator by a live denominator and the result moves on the gold leg alone, which makes the cycle signal people think they are reading a gold signal wearing a copper label. It comes back when copper does.
Two gas benchmarks pointed opposite ways, and a pump that followed WTI, not Brent
Henry Hub printed $2.7 on Aug 25, down 5.92% over 30 days and 13.74% over 90, which leaves it close to the $2.54 floor of its 52-week range. European gas, on a July 1 print, was $17.93, up 18.8% over 30 days and 16.48% over 90, and that print was itself the top of its own 52-week range. Two observations two months apart are not a spread and I will not treat them as one. Even so, a US benchmark scraping the bottom of its year while the European benchmark set the top of its own is the kind of split that decides where energy-hungry production gets done, and it is invisible to anyone watching crude alone. The domestic monthly series makes the same point about the US side from another angle: $2.89 on July 1, down 8.25% over 30 days.
Then the pump, which is the commodity price most people actually meet. US retail gasoline was $4.085 a gallon on Aug 24, up 0.89% on the week and up 2.1% over 30 days. Set that against WTI, up 2.03% over its own 30 days to Aug 31, and the pump is not refusing to follow the domestic barrel: the two ran within a rounding error of each other, on windows ending a week apart. The grade that fell is the seaborne one, with Brent down 12.03% over 30 days to Aug 25. Stretch to 90 days and gasoline is down 8.72%, close to Brent at 9.13% and well past WTI at 4.99%. There is no refinery or inventory data in front of me and I am not going to guess at the cause. The table supports something narrower than the complaint people usually make with it: over the last month the pump tracked WTI, and Brent is what moved away from both.
Cocoa is up 65.65% over 90 days, and that print is two months old
The food side of the complex was running hotter than energy or metals the last time it was observed, and the last time it was observed was July 1. Cocoa was up 27.84% over 30 days and 65.65% over 90, though even that left it under its 52-week high, so call it a recovery rather than a record. Coffee added 16.68% over 30 days. Wheat added 14.57% and its print was the top of its own 52-week range; the two soybean series did the same, beans up 6.73% and meal up 11.24%; sugar added 6.5%.
Three linked crop series topping their year on one day is not a weather story about one crop. Beef argues the other way, down 2.87% over 30 days and 5.59% over 90, and it belongs in the paragraph rather than out of it, because it is the largest exception in the table and the only food line falling.
That is what makes the regime question awkward. The reflation case built at the end of July needs the commodity complex to pass inflation through. The part of the complex passing the most through is the one with no fresh observation behind it. Energy is fresh and has cooled. Food was hot and has gone dark. Anyone reading the August tape and concluding that commodity inflation has rolled over is reading energy and calling it the complex.
Active Scenarios Affecting Commodities
What happens to stocks, bonds, gold, and Bitcoin when the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates? Historical patterns and market playbooks for Fed easing cycles.
What happens when oil prices spike? Inflation fears, consumer squeeze, recession risk, and the complex impact on stocks, bonds, and the dollar.
What happens when gold prices surge? The risk-off signal, inflation hedge demand, central bank buying, and portfolio implications explained.
What happens when copper prices surge? Why "Dr. Copper" is the economy's best diagnostician, and what it means for equities, inflation, and global growth.
What does gold at $3,000 mean for the global economy? Analysis of what drives gold to record highs and the implications for currencies, bonds, equities, and inflation.
What happens when crude oil crashes below $50? Deflationary signals, energy sector carnage, consumer benefits, and geopolitical implications.
What happens when China devalues its currency? Global deflation export, emerging market contagion, commodity impact, and US equity market reactions.
What happens when emerging market currencies collapse? Contagion risk, capital flight, commodity impact, and whether EM crises spill over to US markets.
Recent Analysis
The crude upgrade was sold as a waterborne supply-risk story. Crude is higher, and the barrel doing the work is the landlocked one.
The 28% reflation branch has oil bid and yields rising. It also has cyclicals recovering, and Wednesday delivered the opposite.
Brent shed the war premium as U.S.-Iran strikes paused, yet gold climbed and Convex's NVI held at 81.77. Markets removed one inflation tail without pricing a durable settlement.
Crude rose 3.9% in a session, clearing the $78-90 range the house view carried on Tuesday night. The inflation and credit readings it should be judged against have not been marked since.
WTI at $74.86 and Brent at $79.65 were up nearly 5% with the New York session still open, while high yield spreads sit at 2.70, the tightest reading in the feed. June CPI lands on Tuesday.
WTI at 74.05 sits 3.95 below the gate that flips the oil view bullish. The disinflationary impulse the bond market leans on is eroding whether or not that gate is ever reached.
The market's two long-duration trades are reading the same 10-basis-point rise in real yields and reaching opposite verdicts, four days before June CPI.
A drone strike on Russian energy infrastructure near St. Petersburg lands with no live market to absorb it, Monday reprices everything.
The VIX sits near 16 while Bitcoin’s Fear and Greed Index reads 15. That gap is June’s rates shock showing up in the one asset built to feel it first.
The cartel just approved a fourth straight production hike. With the Strait of Hormuz still closed and the UAE gone, the quota is a number on paper, not a barrel in a tanker.
What to Watch
- •OPEC+ production decisions
- •Copper/gold ratio for cycle signal
- •Dollar strength (DXY) as inverse headwind
- •China PMI for industrial metals demand
- •Real yields for gold positioning
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the commodities outlook for 2026?▾
Commodities split into three buckets: energy (oil, gas), precious metals (gold, silver), and industrial metals/agriculture. Each responds to different macro drivers. The live metrics on this page plus the active scenarios below show where the current environment sits on the distribution of possible paths. The outlook is continuously updated rather than locked in as a point forecast.
What should I watch to track commodities?▾
The core watch list for commodities includes: OPEC+ production decisions; Copper/gold ratio for cycle signal; Dollar strength (DXY) as inverse headwind. The full list is on this page under "What to Watch." These signals are chosen because they are leading rather than coincident, and because they have historically flagged regime transitions before consensus catches up.
How does commodities fit into the broader macro regime?▾
Every Outlook Hub is anchored to the current Convex regime classification (Goldilocks, Reflation, Stagflation, or Deflation). The Macro Regime Context section on this page shows how commodities typically behaves in the current regime and what a regime change would imply for these metrics.
Which scenarios could change the commodities outlook?▾
The "Active Scenarios" section lists scenarios that most directly affect commodities conditions. Each scenario page includes a probability-weighted asset response, historical precedents, and live trigger metrics. Multiple active scenarios at once are the strongest signal that the outlook is about to shift.
How often is the Commodities Outlook refreshed?▾
The key metrics on this page pull live data and refresh within minutes of each release. The regime context and scenario probabilities update daily. The narrative itself is rewritten against the live data on a weekly rotation, with the date of the current version shown at the top of the page, and it is rebuilt sooner when the structural read on commodities changes materially.
Other Outlook Hubs
Get updates on commodities and related analysis delivered to your inbox.
Outlook hubs aggregate live data, scenarios, and analysis from the Convex research desk. They are educational and for informational purposes only. They do not constitute financial advice.