CONVEX

WTI Oil vs US Dollar

WTI crude closed at $95.85 on April 23, 2026; the broad trade-weighted dollar index has weakened approximately 6-8 percent year-to-date 2026 from peak levels in late 2024. The 30-day rolling correlation between WTI and DXY is approximately negative 0.50 to negative 0.65, in the historical range of -0.40 to -0.70 inverse.

ByConvex Research Desk·Edited byBen Bleier·

Also known as: WTI Crude Oil (WTI_AV, crude oil, OIL, WTI live) · Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad) (DXY, dollar index, USD index, trade-weighted dollar)

Commoditiesreal-time
WTI Crude Oil
$100.21
7D -1.79%30D +21.33%
Updated
FX & Dollardaily
Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad)
118.04
7D +0.00%30D -0.17%
Updated

Why This Comparison Matters

WTI crude closed at $95.85 on April 23, 2026; the broad trade-weighted dollar index has weakened approximately 6-8 percent year-to-date 2026 from peak levels in late 2024. The 30-day rolling correlation between WTI and DXY is approximately negative 0.50 to negative 0.65, in the historical range of -0.40 to -0.70 inverse. Oil is priced globally in dollars, so dollar strength makes oil more expensive to non-US buyers, compressing demand. Dollar weakness typically supports oil prices through three channels: foreign demand sustainment, capital flow rotation toward commodity-producing emerging markets, and inflation-hedge demand for oil. The April 2026 setup combines dollar weakness (Fed cuts) with Iran war supply shock - both factors supporting WTI elevated.

The April 2026 Configuration

WTI $95.85 (April 23, 2026); DXY at approximately 100-102 (down 6-8 percent year-to-date 2026 from peak levels in late 2024). The 30-day rolling correlation between WTI and DXY is approximately negative 0.50 to negative 0.65 (inverse).

The relationship has been reliable through Q1-Q2 2026. Dollar weakened on Fed cut delivery (consensus 2-3 cuts in 2026) and Iran ceasefire optimism reducing safe-haven dollar bid. WTI rallied on Iran war supply concerns plus dollar weakness supporting demand.

Forward-looking through 2026: continued Fed cuts maintain dollar weakness pressure, supporting WTI. Iran ceasefire confirmation reduces safe-haven dollar bid further. Both factors support WTI elevated. Reversal scenarios: inflation re-acceleration forces Fed pause/hike, dollar strengthens, WTI compresses on demand concerns plus dollar effect.

The Three Channels of Inverse Correlation

WTI-DXY inverse correlation flows through three structural channels. First, foreign demand: 60+ percent of global oil consumption is non-US. Dollar strength makes oil more expensive in foreign currencies (EUR, JPY, CNY, INR, BRL). Foreign demand compresses on currency-translation effects. Dollar weakness reverses, supporting demand.

Second, capital flows to commodity producers: dollar weakness supports emerging market currencies and capital flows. EM oil-producing nations (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria, Russia historically) benefit from dollar weakness through currency effects and capital inflows. Dollar strength compresses these flows.

Third, inflation-hedge demand: dollar weakness typically reflects fiscal/monetary debasement concerns. Oil benefits as inflation hedge through real-asset characteristics. Dollar strength compresses this hedge demand.

The combined effect produces approximately -0.50 to -0.70 long-run correlation between WTI and DXY (1995-2024).

Historical WTI-DXY Correlation

The WTI-DXY inverse correlation has been one of the most durable macro relationships across multiple decades. Long-run 60-day rolling correlation averages approximately -0.55. Three regime patterns.

Normal markets (most periods): correlation -0.40 to -0.70. Both move on macro factors with dollar dominating. Supply-shock periods (1973-1974, 1990, 2022 Russia-Ukraine, 2026 Iran war): correlation breaks down to 0 to +0.20. Oil moves on supply factors independent of dollar. Dollar bull markets (1980-1985, 2014-2016, 2022): correlation deepens to -0.60 to -0.80. Dollar drives commodity compression dominantly.

The 2025-2026 setup has correlation at -0.50 to -0.65, in the normal range. Iran war initially weakened the correlation (supply shock) but Fed cut dynamics restored the dollar channel. Dollar dynamics dominate WTI direction in mid-2026 absent further Iran war escalation.

The 2014-2016 Dollar Bull Market

The cleanest historical example of WTI-DXY dynamics: 2014-2016 dollar bull market plus oil bust. DXY rose from 80 (2014) to 100 (2016), 25 percent appreciation. WTI fell from $107 (2014) to $26 (2016), 76 percent collapse. Combined effect: dollar strength contributed approximately 25-30 percentage points of WTI decline; supply factors (US shale revolution producing additional 4 mbpd) contributed remaining 45-50 percentage points.

The 2014-2016 correlation peaked at -0.85 during the deepest dollar strength period. Each 1 percent DXY rally produced approximately 4-6 percent WTI decline. The combined dollar+supply collapse made 2014-2016 the largest oil bust since 2008-09 GFC.

The 2025-2026 setup is the inverse. DXY weakening combined with Iran war supply shock both support WTI. Dollar contribution to WTI rally has been approximately 15-20 percentage points; supply factors (Iran war + OPEC+ discipline) contributed approximately 15-20 percentage points additionally.

The Iran War 2026 Test

The February 2026 Iran war provided test of WTI-DXY relationship under supply-shock conditions. Initial Iran escalation produced both dollar strength (safe-haven bid) and oil rally (supply concerns). 30-day correlation went briefly to 0 (March 2026), reflecting both rising together rather than typical inverse.

As Iran ceasefire progressed through April, the relationship reverted. Dollar weakened on Fed cut expectations, oil moderated on ceasefire optimism. Correlation returned to approximately -0.55. The pattern: supply-shock episodes temporarily break correlation; macro factors restore it as the shock recedes.

For 2026 forecast: continued Iran ceasefire confirmation maintains normal -0.55 correlation. Iran escalation breaks correlation again temporarily. Either way, the long-run inverse relationship remains intact through structural channels.

Volatility and Trading

WTI realized volatility approximately 35-50 percent annualized vs DXY 7-9 percent. The 4-6x oil-to-dollar volatility ratio reflects WTI sensitivity to supply-demand shocks dominating the dollar effect.

60-day rolling correlation averages -0.55. During supply shocks correlation rises to 0 to -0.20 (oil moves on its own). During dollar-driven moves correlation deepens to -0.70 to -0.85.

For pair-trade implementation, direct WTI exposure through USO ETF, CL futures (most liquid), or UCO (2x leveraged). DXY exposure through UUP ETF, USDU (broad TWD ETF), or DX futures. The pair has produced consistent inverse correlation but pair-trade carry is modest because both legs are macro-driven similarly.

The trade is most useful as direction filter rather than pair trade. Watch DXY direction for WTI signal: dollar weakness supports WTI; dollar strength compresses WTI. Position oil based on dollar trajectory.

How the Pair Performs Through Cycles

Five regimes describe WTI-vs-DXY through cycles. Regime 1 (1980s strong dollar): DXY peaked at 165 in 1985 (Plaza Accord); WTI fell from $40 to $10 over similar period. Inverse correlation very strong (-0.80). Regime 2 (1990s stable dollar): WTI ranged $15-25 with limited dollar effect. Regime 3 (2003-2008 commodity supercycle): both moved on global growth; correlation weakened to -0.30. Regime 4 (2014-2016 dollar bull + oil bust): correlation peaked at -0.85. Regime 5 (current 2024-2026 dollar weakness + Iran war): correlation -0.50 to -0.65 in normal range.

The long-run pattern: inverse correlation reliable but with periodic breakdowns during supply shocks or commodity-specific cycles. The relationship has not weakened structurally over 50+ years - it remains one of the most durable cross-asset macro relationships.

For 2026-2027 outlook, continued Fed cuts plus oil supply factors should maintain WTI elevated through the dollar channel and supply discipline. Reversal would require Fed re-hiking on inflation surprise or Iran resolution combined with US shale production surge.

How the Pair Behaves in Recessions

Recession history shows mixed dynamics. 2008-09 GFC: DXY rallied initially on safe-haven (75 to 89, +18 percent) before falling in 2009 on Fed easing. WTI fell from $147 to $35 (-76 percent). Inverse correlation worked through Fed-easing channel as DXY weakened.

2020 COVID: DXY rallied from 96 to 103 in March 2020 (safe-haven) then fell to 89 by year-end (Fed easing). WTI fell to negative briefly then recovered to $50 by year-end. Mixed correlation during the episode.

2022 hiking cycle: DXY rallied to 114 (September 2022 peak) on Fed restrictive policy. WTI rallied to $124 (March 2022) on Russia-Ukraine then fell to $70 by year-end. Mixed dynamics with supply factors dominating WTI direction.

For 2026 recession scenarios, expect dollar to rally initially on safe-haven bid (compress WTI), then fall as Fed cuts deliver (support WTI recovery). The bidirectional dollar effect means WTI compresses during initial recession phase but recovers as Fed delivers easing.

Reading the Pair as a Trading Tool

For pair traders, the WTI-DXY relationship is best implemented as direction filter rather than pair trade due to the supply-shock breakdown risk.

Current April 2026 configuration: DXY weak, WTI elevated. The dollar weakness supports continued WTI elevation. Position long WTI based on continued Fed cut delivery and dollar weakness. Reverse if Fed pivots to hawkish.

Pair trade implementation: long WTI / short DXY captures continued dollar weakness benefiting commodities. Long DXY / short WTI captures dollar reversal scenarios that hurt commodities. Position sizing: WTI 35-50 percent annualized vol vs DXY 7-9 percent (4-6x ratio).

The pair has produced consistent positive carry over 2024-2026 (long WTI short DXY gained approximately 35-40 percent cumulative). The carry concentrated in dollar-weakness episodes (Q1 2024, Q2-Q3 2025, Q1 2026). Trend continuation requires Fed cut delivery extending dollar weakness.

The April 2026 Configuration

WTI $95.85 April 23 2026; DXY ~100-102 (down 6-8% YTD 2026 from late 2024 peak). 30-day correlation -0.50 to -0.65 (normal inverse range). WTI YTD 2026 +31% on Iran war supply shock; DXY -6-8% on Fed cut delivery.

Forward-looking: continued Fed cuts (2-3 cuts in 2026 base case) maintain dollar weakness, supporting WTI elevated. Iran ceasefire confirmation reduces safe-haven dollar bid further. Both factors support WTI through 2026 absent inflation re-acceleration forcing Fed pause. Recession scenarios complicated: initial dollar safe-haven rally compresses WTI, but Fed cut acceleration supports recovery.

Watch the 30-day correlation for moves outside -0.40 to -0.75. Above -0.40 indicates supply factors dominating (Iran war escalation territory). Below -0.75 indicates dollar dominance (typically dollar bull markets or extreme Fed-driven moves). The pair offers macro oil direction signal through dollar trajectory.

Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)

How Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in WTI Crude Oil. Computed from 1,237 aligned daily observations ending .

Up-shock
WTI Crude Oil top-decile up-day (mean trigger +4.27%)
Mean 5D forward
-0.02%
Median 5D
+0.05%
Edge vs baseline
-0.05 pp
Hit rate (positive)
51%

Following these triggers, Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad) falls 0.02% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.03%. 124 qualifying events; Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad) closed positive in 51% of them.

n = 124 trigger events
Down-shock
WTI Crude Oil bottom-decile down-day (mean trigger -4.57%)
Mean 5D forward
-0.10%
Median 5D
-0.17%
Edge vs baseline
-0.13 pp
Hit rate (positive)
43%

Following these triggers, Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad) falls 0.10% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.03%. 122 qualifying events; Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad) closed positive in 43% of them.

n = 122 trigger events

Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.

90-Day Statistics

WTI Crude Oil
90D High
$114.25
90D Low
$65.19
90D Average
$93.09
90D Change
+53.72%
76 data points
Trade-Weighted Dollar (Broad)
90D High
121.29
90D Low
117.74
90D Average
119.12
90D Change
+0.26%
59 data points

Explore Each Metric

Related Scenarios & Forecasts

ShareXRedditLinkedInHN

Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current WTI-DXY relationship?+

WTI $95.85 April 23 2026; DXY ~100-102 (down 6-8% YTD 2026 from peak levels late 2024). 30-day rolling correlation -0.50 to -0.65 (in historical range of -0.40 to -0.70 inverse). The relationship has been reliable through Q1-Q2 2026. Dollar weakened on Fed cut delivery (consensus 2-3 cuts 2026) and Iran ceasefire optimism reducing safe-haven dollar bid. WTI rallied on Iran war supply concerns plus dollar weakness supporting demand. WTI YTD 2026 +31%, DXY -6-8%.

Why does oil inversely correlate with the dollar?+

Three structural channels. First, foreign demand: 60+% of global oil consumption is non-US. Dollar strength makes oil more expensive in foreign currencies (EUR, JPY, CNY, INR, BRL); foreign demand compresses on currency-translation effects. Second, capital flows to commodity producers: dollar weakness supports EM currencies and capital flows. EM oil producers (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria) benefit through currency and capital effects. Third, inflation-hedge demand: dollar weakness typically reflects fiscal/monetary debasement concerns. Oil benefits as inflation hedge. Long-run -0.50 to -0.70 correlation 1995-2024.

How has the relationship varied historically?+

Long-run 60-day rolling correlation averages ~-0.55. Three regime patterns. Normal markets: -0.40 to -0.70. Supply-shock periods (1973-74, 1990, 2022 Russia-Ukraine, 2026 Iran): correlation breaks to 0 to +0.20. Dollar bull markets (1980-1985, 2014-2016, 2022): correlation deepens -0.60 to -0.80. The 2025-2026 setup at -0.50 to -0.65 in normal range. Iran war initially weakened correlation (supply shock), Fed cut dynamics restored dollar channel. Dollar dynamics dominate WTI direction in mid-2026 absent further Iran escalation.

What was the 2014-2016 dollar bull market impact?+

Cleanest historical example. DXY rose from 80 (2014) to 100 (2016), 25% appreciation. WTI fell from $107 (2014) to $26 (2016), 76% collapse. Dollar contribution to WTI decline ~25-30pp; supply factors (US shale revolution adding 4 mbpd) contributed remaining 45-50pp. 2014-2016 correlation peaked -0.85 during deepest dollar strength period. Each 1% DXY rally produced ~4-6% WTI decline. 2025-2026 setup is the inverse: DXY weakening + Iran war supply shock both support WTI. Dollar contribution ~15-20pp of WTI rally; supply ~15-20pp.

How did Iran war affect WTI-DXY?+

February 2026 Iran war provided supply-shock test. Initial escalation produced both dollar strength (safe-haven) and oil rally (supply concerns). 30-day correlation briefly to 0 (March 2026), both rising together rather than typical inverse. As Iran ceasefire progressed through April, relationship reverted: dollar weakened on Fed cut expectations, oil moderated on ceasefire optimism. Correlation returned to ~-0.55. Pattern: supply-shock episodes temporarily break correlation; macro factors restore it as shock recedes. Long-run inverse relationship remains intact through structural channels.

How volatile is the pair?+

WTI realized volatility ~35-50% annualized vs DXY 7-9% (4-6x oil-to-dollar volatility ratio reflects WTI sensitivity to supply-demand shocks dominating dollar effect). 60-day rolling correlation averages -0.55. During supply shocks correlation rises 0 to -0.20 (oil moves on own). During dollar-driven moves correlation deepens -0.70 to -0.85. Direct WTI exposure: USO ETF, CL futures (most liquid), UCO (2x leveraged). DXY exposure: UUP ETF, USDU (broad TWD), DX futures. Pair has consistent inverse correlation but pair-trade carry modest (both legs macro-driven similarly). Most useful as direction filter rather than pair trade.

How does the pair perform in recessions?+

Recession history mixed. 2008-09 GFC: DXY initially +18% (safe-haven, 75 to 89), then fell in 2009 on Fed easing. WTI -76% ($147 to $35). Inverse correlation worked through Fed-easing channel as DXY weakened. 2020 COVID: DXY +7% (96 to 103) March 2020 then -14% to 89 year-end. WTI briefly negative, recovered to $50 year-end. 2022 hiking: DXY rallied to 114 (Sept 2022) peak; WTI rallied to $124 (March 2022) then fell to $70 (mixed with Russia-Ukraine supply factors). For 2026 recession: dollar initially rallies on safe-haven (compresses WTI), then falls as Fed cuts deliver (supports WTI recovery).

How do I trade WTI vs DXY?+

WTI-DXY relationship best implemented as direction filter rather than pair trade due to supply-shock breakdown risk. Current April 2026: DXY weak, WTI elevated. Dollar weakness supports continued WTI elevation. Position long WTI based on continued Fed cut delivery and dollar weakness. Reverse if Fed pivots hawkish. Pair implementation: long WTI / short DXY captures continued dollar weakness; long DXY / short WTI captures dollar reversal scenarios. Position sizing: WTI 35-50% annualized vol vs DXY 7-9% (4-6x). Pair has produced ~35-40% cumulative carry 2024-2026 long WTI short DXY. Watch correlation for moves outside -0.40 to -0.75.

Related Comparisons

Explore Across Convex

Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.