Walmart (WMT) vs Consumer Discretionary (XLY)
Walmart closed at $131.94 in April 2026 with a $1.036 trillion market cap. XLY top holdings are Amazon at 22.31 percent, Tesla at 19.19 percent, Home Depot at 6.06 percent, McDonald's at approximately 4 percent, Booking Holdings at approximately 3.5 percent, Lowe's at approximately 3 percent.
Also known as: Walmart (WMT) (STK_WMT, Walmart) · Consumer Discretionary (XLY) (ETF_XLY, consumer discretionary)
Why This Comparison Matters
Walmart closed at $131.94 in April 2026 with a $1.036 trillion market cap. XLY top holdings are Amazon at 22.31 percent, Tesla at 19.19 percent, Home Depot at 6.06 percent, McDonald's at approximately 4 percent, Booking Holdings at approximately 3.5 percent, Lowe's at approximately 3 percent. The top 10 holdings represent 70.47 percent of XLY assets across 51 total holdings. The pair captures the rotation between defensive consumer-staples retail (Walmart in XLP) and cyclical consumer-discretionary spending (Amazon e-commerce, Tesla autos, home improvement, dining, travel). Year-to-date 2026, Walmart has gained approximately 6 percent versus XLY approximately negative 2 percent, an 8 percentage point divergence reflecting consumer caution and the Tesla-Amazon-driven XLY weakness.
XLY Composition and Concentration
XLY is one of the most concentrated sector ETFs after XLC. Top three holdings: Amazon 22.31 percent, Tesla 19.19 percent, Home Depot 6.06 percent. Combined Amazon plus Tesla is approximately 41.5 percent of XLY. The next tier: McDonald's ~4 percent, Booking Holdings ~3.5 percent, Lowe's ~3 percent, NIKE ~2.5 percent, TJX ~2.5 percent, Starbucks ~2 percent.
XLY composition reflects the GICS classification of consumer discretionary: e-commerce (Amazon), autos (Tesla, Ford, GM), home improvement (Home Depot, Lowe's), restaurants (McDonald's, Starbucks, Chipotle), travel (Booking, Marriott, Carnival), apparel (NIKE, Lululemon, Tapestry), and discount retail discretionary (TJX). The Amazon-Tesla concentration means XLY moves more on those two names than on the underlying consumer-discretionary fundamentals.
The Staples vs Discretionary Divide
Walmart-vs-XLY captures the most fundamental consumer-economy divide: essential spending (food, household items, clothing basics) versus discretionary spending (dining out, travel, autos, e-commerce general goods, home improvement). The divide tracks consumer income growth, real wage trajectory, and labor market tightness.
In strong consumer environments (2010-2019 expansion, 2021 stimulus), discretionary spending grows faster than staples, lifting XLY relative to Walmart. In weak consumer environments (2008-2009 recession, 2022-2023 inflation, 2026 partial), staples spending holds up better than discretionary, with consumers cutting restaurants, travel, and autos before cutting groceries. The pair amplifies this signal: WMT outperformance is the consumer-defensive trade.
The April 2026 setup has WMT outperforming XLY YTD by 8 percentage points, indicating consumer caution. This is consistent with sticky inflation (CPI 3.3 percent), weak real wage growth, and Iran war-related consumer-confidence drag.
Why WMT Has Outperformed XLY 2024-2026
Walmart has outperformed XLY consistently over 2024-2026 by approximately 35 percentage points cumulatively. Three drivers.
First, Walmart's structural transformation: e-commerce profitability convergence with stores, Walmart Connect ad business reaching $4 billion in 2025 (50 percent annual growth), supply chain investment driving margin expansion. The fundamentals genuinely justify the outperformance.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Consumer Discretionary (XLY) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Walmart (WMT). Computed from 1,283 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Consumer Discretionary (XLY) falls 0.01% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.09%. 127 qualifying events; Consumer Discretionary (XLY) closed positive in 51% of them.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the current WMT and XLY levels?+
Walmart closed at $131.94 in April 2026 with $1.036 trillion market cap. XLY trades at approximately $200, with the WMT/XLY ratio at 0.66. The ratio has gained ~50 percent over three years from 0.44, with the 5-year range 0.40-0.70. Year-to-date 2026, WMT gained ~6 percent versus XLY ~-2 percent, an 8 percentage point divergence. WMT is structurally a consumer staples holding (XLP, 11.85 percent weight); XLY captures pure consumer discretionary spending. The pair is the cleanest staples-vs-discretionary trade in equity markets.
What's in XLY?+
XLY is one of the most concentrated sector ETFs. April 2026 top holdings: Amazon 22.31 percent, Tesla 19.19 percent, Home Depot 6.06 percent, McDonald's ~4 percent, Booking Holdings ~3.5 percent, Lowe's ~3 percent, NIKE ~2.5 percent, TJX ~2.5 percent, Starbucks ~2 percent. Top 10 = 70.47 percent of fund. 51 total holdings. Combined Amazon plus Tesla is ~41.5 percent of XLY. Sectors include e-commerce (Amazon), autos (Tesla/Ford/GM), home improvement (HD/Lowe's), restaurants (MCD/SBUX/CMG), travel (BKNG/MAR/CCL), apparel (NKE/LULU/TPR), discount discretionary (TJX).
Why has WMT outperformed XLY 2024-2026?+
Walmart has outperformed XLY by ~35 percentage points cumulatively over 2024-2026. Three drivers: First, Walmart's structural transformation: Walmart Connect ad business reaching $4 billion in 2025 (50 percent annual growth), e-commerce profitability convergence, supply chain investment. Second, XLY top holdings face specific challenges: Amazon (AWS growth concerns, retail margin pressure), Tesla (delivery growth slowing to single digits, robotaxi launch delays). Combined Amazon+Tesla ~41.5 percent of XLY. Third, broader discretionary sector facing 2024-2025 same-store-sales softness on consumer spending pressure.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.