Recession Index vs HY Spreads
Convex Recession Probability Index (CVRP) aggregates yield curve + Sahm Rule + LEI + claims + credit spreads + NY Fed model into 0-100 scale. ICE BofA HY OAS (FRED BAMLH0A0HYM2) measures market-priced default risk.
Also known as: CVRP, Convex Recession Probability (CVRP, CRPI, recession probability, recession index) · HY Credit Spread (OAS) (HY spread, high yield spread, junk bond spread, HY OAS)
Why This Comparison Matters
Convex Recession Probability Index (CVRP) aggregates yield curve + Sahm Rule + LEI + claims + credit spreads + NY Fed model into 0-100 scale. ICE BofA HY OAS (FRED BAMLH0A0HYM2) measures market-priced default risk. April 2026: CVRP elevated (Sahm Rule triggered, yield curve normalized but still showing residual stress, LEI declining); HY OAS approximately 280bp (long-run average ~550bp; 25-year tights below 300bp). Combined: recession indicators flashing warnings + credit spreads pricing zero recession. Most divergent CVRP-HY relationship in recent history. Either credit complacent (will widen sharply) or recession indicators false-positive (will normalize).
The April 2026 Configuration
CVRP components April 2026: NY Fed yield curve probability 18.8% (declining); Sahm Rule TRIGGERED (3-month MA U3 4.3% above 3.5% trailing low); LEI six-month change -1.3% (improving from -7.6% early 2024); initial claims 225K (stable); HY OAS ~280bp (tight, contributing risk-on signal). CVRP net: elevated on labor/yield curve indicators, offset by claims + credit.
HY OAS: approximately 280bp (April 2026). Tightest range since 2007. Long-run average 550bp. 25-year low ~250bp (June 2007 pre-GFC).
CVRP-HY divergence: CVRP elevated but HY tight. Credit market positioning soft landing. Recession indicators positioning concern.
April 2026 reading: extreme divergence. Either credit market is complacent (will widen on recession arrival) or recession indicators are false-positive (will normalize). Cross-asset markets price scenario 2 (false positive). Position cautiously.
Historical precedent: similar setups 2006-2007 + 1999-2000 preceded HY OAS widening from sub-300bp to 1000bp+. Caution warranted but timing uncertain.
Long-Term Range and Recent Trajectory
HY OAS history: 250bp (June 2007 pre-GFC tight), 1971bp (December 2008 peak), 1083bp (March 2020 COVID peak), 879bp (November 2022 hiking peak), 280bp (April 2026 current). Range 250bp-2000bp.
2024-2026 compression: HY OAS tightened from 380bp (December 2023) to 280bp (April 2026). 100bp compression. Reflects: (1) economic resilience without recession, (2) Fed pause + easing room, (3) AI capex narrative supporting HY issuers, (4) low default rates ~3-4%.
Default rates: April 2026 trailing 12-month HY default ~3.5%. Long-run average 4.0%. Below average. Supports tight spreads.
CVRP trajectory: declined slightly from late 2024 peak as yield curve re-steepened, partial offset from Sahm Rule continued trigger.
Divergence widened 2024-2026: CVRP stable-elevated + HY tightened 100bp. Most divergent reading in modern history.
Historical Precedents: Past Episodes
2007 pre-GFC: HY OAS 250bp June 2007 (tight). CVRP elevated (yield curve inverted 2006). 12 months later: HY OAS 1971bp December 2008. +1700bp widening. Recession December 2007-June 2009.
2000 dot-com: HY OAS 540bp (relatively tight given recession ahead). CVRP elevated (yield curve inverted 2000 -75bp). 12 months later: HY OAS 1100bp+ (October 2002). +560bp widening. Recession March-November 2001.
2019 pre-COVID: HY OAS 350bp (tight). CVRP elevated (yield curve inverted briefly 2019). 12 months later: HY OAS 1083bp March 2020. +730bp widening. Recession Q1-Q2 2020.
2022 pre-hiking peak: HY OAS 270bp December 2021. CVRP moderate. 11 months later: HY OAS 879bp November 2022. +600bp widening. No recession but credit stress.
Pattern: HY OAS sub-300bp + elevated CVRP historically preceded HY widening 600-1700bp within 12-18 months. April 2026: HY 280bp + CVRP elevated. Setup matches 2006-2007 + 1999-2000 + 2019. Risk warning material.
Mechanics: Why the Divergence Matters
CVRP mechanics: aggregates 6 recession indicators (yield curve + Sahm Rule + LEI + claims + credit spreads + NY Fed). 0-100 scale. Higher = more recession risk.
HY OAS mechanics: market-priced spread over Treasuries reflecting default risk + liquidity premium + risk appetite. Tighter = more risk appetite + fewer expected defaults.
CVRP inclusion of HY: feedback loop. HY tightness contributes to CVRP lower reading (offsetting Sahm + LEI). Limits CVRP flexibility as risk-off signal.
Divergence resolution mechanisms: (1) recession arrives, HY widens sharply (catch-up), CVRP rises further. (2) recession does not arrive, HY stays tight, CVRP declines as Sahm un-triggers. (3) status quo persists for extended period (rare historically).
Key divergence amplifier: AI capex era ~$300B+ annual sustaining HY issuer cash flows + reducing default risk. Structural change supporting tight spreads.
April 2026: divergence reflects AI-era credit market resilience vs traditional recession framework. Both could be partially right.
Reading the Pair: Convergence and Divergence
Convergence type 1: low CVRP + tight HY = healthy expansion. Best risk-on. Examples: 2010-2012, 2017-2018.
Convergence type 2: high CVRP + wide HY = recession imminent or in progress. Risk-off. Examples: 2008 GFC, 2020 COVID, 2022 hiking stress.
Divergence type 1: elevated CVRP + tight HY = credit complacency before recession. Examples: 2006-2007 (preceded GFC), 1999-2000 (preceded dot-com), 2019 (preceded COVID), April 2026 (current).
Divergence type 2: low CVRP + wide HY = post-recession recovery. Credit slow to normalize. Examples: 2009-2010, late 2020.
April 2026 regime: divergence type 1. Historically resolved via HY widening 600-1700bp within 12-18 months when accompanied by recession. April 2026 anomaly: 21+ months past Sahm trigger without recession arrival. Either delayed widening ahead or first historical exception.
Driver Decomposition: What Moves the Spread
CVRP drivers: (1) Yield curve normalization 2024-2026 (curve +31bp from -110bp inversion, lowering yield-curve component). (2) Sahm Rule remains triggered (high contribution). (3) LEI declining but rate moderating. (4) Initial claims 225K stable.
HY OAS drivers: (1) Default rates ~3.5% (below average 4%). (2) AI capex sustaining HY issuer cash flows. (3) Fed easing room reducing systemic risk. (4) Risk appetite (CRAI elevated) supporting compression. (5) Tight credit conditions for refinancing (positive for existing bondholders).
Divergence drivers: (1) Sahm Rule trigger via labor force expansion (false signal in this cycle). (2) AI capex era reducing fundamental default risk. (3) Fed pause room providing easing optionality. (4) Fiscal support sustaining demand.
April 2026 reading: CVRP elevated reflects traditional cycle indicators. HY tight reflects post-COVID structural changes. Both partially correct.
Cross-Asset Implications
Bonds: 10Y 4.31% sticky high. 2Y 4.00% pricing modest cuts. Bond market positioning soft landing.
Equities: SPY ~$712 record territory. Equities pricing soft landing. Forward P/E 22x.
Dollar: DXY ~100. Mild dollar strength.
Commodities: Gold $4,722 record. WTI $95.85 elevated.
Volatility: VIX 18.76 elevated but not stressed.
Credit: HY 280bp tight + IG OAS ~80bp 25-year tights. Credit positioned soft landing aggressively.
April 2026 cross-asset reading: all asset classes positioned soft-landing. CVRP recession indicators ignored. Setup most similar to 2006-2007 (preceded GFC) and 1999-2000 (preceded dot-com). Caution warranted.
Trading the Pair: Setups and Sizing
Setup 1 (soft landing confirmed, base case 50%): CVRP declines as Sahm un-triggers + LEI normalizes. HY stays tight 250-350bp. No recession. Trade: maintain HY exposure, modest equity overweight, flatten yield curve carry.
Setup 2 (delayed recession arrives, risk 35%): claims above 350K, U3 above 5%, recession declared. HY widens 300-1000bp+ to 600-1300bp. Trade: short HYG + long IG/Treasury + long volatility. Aggressive credit short setup. Best risk-reward.
Setup 3 (status quo divergence, 15%): CVRP elevated + HY tight persists 12+ months. Trade: balanced positioning, watch for resolution.
Key watch points: HY OAS daily, CVRP weekly, default rates monthly, claims weekly.
Position sizing: in extreme divergence late-cycle, reduce gross exposure 15-25% from neutral. Underweight HY credit. Hedge with HYG puts at -10% strike. Reserve dry powder for setup 2 confirmation.
Key: HY widening above 400bp = early-warning for setup 2. Above 500bp = full risk-off positioning trigger.
Convex Indices Linkage
CVRP itself synthesizes 6 recession indicators including HY spreads. Internal consistency: HY tightness reduces CVRP level. CVRP elevated despite HY tight reflects Sahm + LEI + yield curve heavy contribution.
Convex Net Liquidity Impulse (CNLI): Fed balance sheet + RRP + TGA. April 2026 CNLI neutral-positive. Tailwind to credit markets via lower discount rates.
Convex Risk Appetite Index (CRAI): credit spreads + equity vol + risk currencies. April 2026 CRAI elevated (HY tight contributing). Risk-on positioning intact.
Divergence between CVRP (recession concerns) + CRAI (risk-on) characterizes late-cycle. Use CVRP as early-warning. CRAI for trade timing.
April 2026 reading: cross-asset markets discount soft landing despite CVRP signal. Most similar historical setup 2006-2007 + 1999-2000. Resolution typically takes 12-18 months from divergence start.
What to Watch in 2026
HY OAS trajectory: tight 250-350bp = soft landing confirmed. Widening to 400bp = early warning. Above 500bp = full recession positioning.
Default rates: trailing 12-month above 5% = HY widening accelerator. Currently 3.5%.
Sahm Rule: U3 stabilization 4.0-4.5% = false positive confirmed, CVRP declines. Above 5% = recession arriving.
LEI six-month change: improvement to 0% or positive = soft landing confirmed. Re-acceleration below -3% = recession imminent.
Fed cuts: market pricing 1-2 cuts H2 2026. Cuts support both CVRP decline + HY compression.
Corporate fundamentals: HY issuer interest coverage, cash flows, refinancing wall. AI capex era supports HY fundamentals.
Key risk: HY widening from 280bp to 400bp signals divergence resolution beginning. Rapid widening typical (sub-3 month from breakout to peak).
April 2026 base case: CVRP declines, HY stays tight, soft landing confirmed by year-end. But position cautiously given historical precedent (2006-2007, 1999-2000).
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How HY Credit Spread (OAS) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in CVRP, Convex Recession Probability. Computed from 1,299 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, HY Credit Spread (OAS) rises 1.01% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.07%. 128 qualifying events; HY Credit Spread (OAS) closed positive in 52% of them.
Following these triggers, HY Credit Spread (OAS) rises 0.79% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +0.07%. 131 qualifying events; HY Credit Spread (OAS) closed positive in 49% of them.
Past behavior in the tails is descriptive, not predictive. Mean response is the simple arithmetic mean of compounded 5-day forward returns following each trigger event; baseline is the unconditional mean across the full sample window. Edge measures the gap between the two.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the April 2026 CVRP vs HY Spreads configuration?+
CVRP elevated (Sahm Rule triggered + LEI declining + yield curve normalizing). HY OAS ~280bp (tightest since 2007). Tight HY despite elevated recession indicators. Most divergent reading in modern history. Setup most similar to 2006-2007 (preceded GFC, HY widened from 250bp to 1971bp) + 1999-2000 (preceded dot-com, HY widened 540bp to 1100bp+) + 2019 (preceded COVID, HY widened 350bp to 1083bp).
Why are HY spreads so tight despite recession indicators?+
Three drivers: (1) Default rates ~3.5% (below 4% average) reflecting healthy fundamentals. (2) AI capex era ~0B+ annual sustaining HY issuer cash flows + reducing default risk. (3) Fed easing room reducing systemic risk. (4) Risk appetite intact (CRAI elevated). (5) Structural changes (services-driven economy + immigration labor expansion + fiscal support) reducing recession sensitivity. Either credit complacent or recession indicators false-positive.
What are historical HY widening precedents?+
2007: HY 250bp June to 1971bp December 2008 (+1700bp). 2000: HY 540bp to 1100bp+ October 2002 (+560bp). 2019: HY 350bp to 1083bp March 2020 (+730bp). 2022: HY 270bp December 2021 to 879bp November 2022 (+600bp). Average widening from sub-300bp tight + elevated CVRP to peak: 600-1700bp within 12-18 months. April 2026: HY 280bp + CVRP elevated matches setup. Risk material.
How is the divergence typically resolved?+
Three resolutions: (1) Recession arrives, HY widens sharply 300-1000bp+ within 12 months, CVRP rises further. Historical pattern. (2) Recession does not arrive, HY stays tight, CVRP declines as Sahm un-triggers + LEI normalizes. April 2026 anomaly base case. (3) Status quo persists 12+ months. Rare historically. April 2026: 21+ months past Sahm trigger already breaks historical pattern. Either delayed widening ahead or first historical exception.
What is the trading framework for April 2026?+
Setup 1 (50%): soft landing, CVRP declines, HY stays tight. Maintain HY exposure. Setup 2 (35%): delayed recession, HY widens 300-1000bp+. Short HYG + long IG/Treasury + long volatility. Best risk-reward. Setup 3 (15%): status quo divergence persists. Reduce gross 15-25% from neutral. Underweight HY credit. Hedge with HYG puts at -10% strike. HY widening above 400bp = early warning, above 500bp = full risk-off trigger.
Why is HY-CVRP divergence dangerous?+
Historically resolved via sharp HY widening when recession arrives. 2006-2007 setup matches April 2026 most closely: HY tight + yield curve inverted + LEI declining + Sahm Rule triggered. 18 months later GFC + HY widening from 250bp to 1971bp. Risk-reward favors short HY positioning even if probability is below 50%. Asymmetric payoff: limited upside (compression to 250bp), large downside (widening to 1000bp+).
What macro conditions could resolve divergence to soft landing?+
Five conditions: (1) Sahm Rule un-triggers as U3 stabilizes 4.0-4.5%. (2) LEI six-month change improves to 0% as components normalize. (3) Fed delivers 75bp+ cuts H2 2026 supporting growth. (4) AI capex sustained at 0B+ annual. (5) No recession declared by NBER through end-2027. Combined would resolve CVRP elevation, validating tight HY. Cross-asset markets price 50% probability of this scenario.
How does AI capex impact HY tightness?+
AI capex ~0B+ annual (Apple Microsoft Google Meta Amazon Nvidia + supply chain) flows to HY issuers via service contracts, equipment financing, data center construction. Sustains HY issuer cash flows + reduces default risk. Particular benefit: tech HY, energy HY (data center power), industrial HY (capex infrastructure). Structural change explaining 100bp compression 2024-2026 despite elevated CVRP. Major shift from pre-COVID economy.
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.