Tesla (TSLA) vs Nvidia (NVDA)
Tesla traded near $376 in late April 2026, with market capitalization approximately $1.2 trillion. NVIDIA traded at $208 with market capitalization $5.06 trillion.
Also known as: Tesla (TSLA) (STK_TSLA, Tesla) · Nvidia (NVDA) (STK_NVDA, Nvidia)
Why This Comparison Matters
Tesla traded near $376 in late April 2026, with market capitalization approximately $1.2 trillion. NVIDIA traded at $208 with market capitalization $5.06 trillion. The NVDA/TSLA market cap ratio of approximately 4.2x reflects the dramatic divergence between the two highest-volatility mega-caps. NVIDIA is the pure AI infrastructure play (selling GPUs to hyperscalers); Tesla is the applied AI play (robotaxi, Optimus humanoid, FSD subscriptions). Both stocks have realized volatility well above other mega-caps (NVDA 38 percent, TSLA 50 to 60 percent annualized). The pair captures whether AI capex continues to lead (NVDA outperforms) or whether applied AI breakthroughs validate Tesla's thesis (TSLA outperforms).
TSLA and NVDA: The Two Highest-Beta Mega-Caps
NVIDIA at $5.06 trillion and Tesla at $1.2 trillion have realized volatilities well above other mega-cap stocks. NVDA realized vol approximately 38 percent annualized; TSLA approximately 50 to 60 percent annualized. By comparison, AAPL and MSFT realized vols are approximately 22 percent. The high volatility makes both stocks attractive for tactical trading and high-conviction position-taking; both also produce outsized drawdowns during stress events.
The two stocks share retail trading concentration. TSLA has the highest retail ownership share among mega-caps (estimated 30 to 35 percent of float held by retail). NVDA has lower retail concentration (approximately 15 to 20 percent) but very active retail trading volume. The retail concentration produces higher reactivity to news and social media narratives than other mega-caps. Both stocks frequently experience 5 to 10 percent moves on single news events.
AI Infrastructure vs Applied AI
NVIDIA and Tesla represent two ends of the AI value chain. NVIDIA sells the AI accelerator GPUs that hyperscalers use to train and serve AI models. Tesla applies AI to specific products: Full Self-Driving (FSD) for vehicles, robotaxi for autonomous transportation, Optimus for humanoid robotics. The relationship is not directly competitive: Tesla actually buys NVIDIA chips for AI training (Tesla's Cortex training cluster uses NVIDIA H100s).
The distinction matters for the pair. NVDA benefits from AI capex acceleration regardless of which applied AI products succeed. TSLA benefits from specific applied AI breakthroughs (FSD validation, robotaxi commercial scale, Optimus production). NVDA's revenue is highly visible (hyperscaler capex commitments are reported quarterly); TSLA's revenue is less visible (autonomous and humanoid products are still pre-commercial scale). Markets have priced NVDA's near-term revenue at high multiples and TSLA's long-term applied AI thesis at very high multiples reflecting different uncertainty profiles.
NVDA vs TSLA Through the AI Cycle
From November 2022 through April 2026, NVDA gained approximately 540 percent versus TSLA approximately 95 percent. The 445 percentage point gap is large but smaller than NVDA-vs-MSFT (465pp) and NVDA-vs-AAPL (465pp). The reason: TSLA had its own narrative-driven rally in late 2024 (Trump election), reaching $480 peak before declining 60 percent to $200 trough in May 2025.
Conditional Forward Response (Tail Events)
How Nvidia (NVDA) has historically behaved in the 5 sessions following a top-decile or bottom-decile daily move in Tesla (TSLA). Computed from 1,281 aligned daily observations ending .
Following these triggers, Nvidia (NVDA) rises 1.14% on average over the next 5 sessions, versus an unconditional baseline of +1.15%. 129 qualifying events; Nvidia (NVDA) closed positive in 54% of them.
90-Day Statistics
Explore Each Metric
Related Scenarios & Forecasts
Get daily macro analysis comparing key metrics delivered to your inbox. Stay ahead of market-moving divergences.
Frequently Asked Questions
How big is NVDA vs TSLA?+
NVIDIA traded at $208 on April 25, 2026, with market capitalization $5.06 trillion (world's most valuable company). Tesla traded near $376 in late April 2026 with market capitalization approximately $1.2 trillion. The NVDA/TSLA market cap ratio is approximately 4.2x. The ratio expanded from 0.30x at end of 2022 to 4.2x in April 2026, the 14x relative move being the largest in mega-cap history. NVIDIA is the pure AI infrastructure play (selling GPUs to hyperscalers); Tesla is the applied AI play (robotaxi, Optimus humanoid, FSD subscriptions).
How volatile are NVDA and TSLA?+
Both are the highest-volatility mega-caps. NVDA realized vol approximately 38 percent annualized; TSLA approximately 50 to 60 percent annualized. By comparison, AAPL and MSFT realized vols are approximately 22 percent. The high volatility makes both stocks attractive for tactical trading but produces outsized drawdowns during stress events. Both stocks frequently experience 5 to 10 percent moves on single news events. TSLA has the highest retail ownership share among mega-caps (estimated 30 to 35 percent of float held by retail); NVDA approximately 15 to 20 percent.
What is the difference between NVDA and TSLA AI?+
NVIDIA and Tesla represent two ends of the AI value chain. NVIDIA sells the AI accelerator GPUs that hyperscalers use to train and serve AI models; benefits from AI capex acceleration regardless of which applied AI products succeed. Tesla applies AI to specific products: Full Self-Driving for vehicles, robotaxi for autonomous transportation, Optimus for humanoid robotics; benefits from specific applied AI breakthroughs. Tesla actually buys NVIDIA chips for AI training (Tesla's Cortex training cluster uses NVIDIA H100s). NVDA's revenue is highly visible quarterly; TSLA's revenue is less visible (autonomous and humanoid products still pre-commercial scale).
Related Comparisons
Explore Across Convex
Data sourced from FRED, CoinGecko, CBOE, and other providers. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.